of course it's "Mormon Doctrine"

Post by **_Tim** » Wed Apr 18, 2012 5:30 pm

of course Bruce McConkie's "Mormon Doctrine" is official church doctrine. It's right there in the NAME of the book. case closed. :lol:

Post by **_Polygamy-Porter** » Wed Apr 18, 2012 5:32 pm

Tim wrote:of course Bruce McConkie's "Mormon Doctrine" is official church doctrine. It's right there in the NAME of the book. case closed.

The only members who do not consider it doctrine are internet Mormons.

Post by **_Tim** » Wed Apr 18, 2012 5:50 pm

and of course Scientology is "science"

Post by **_bcspace** » Wed Apr 18, 2012 6:15 pm

of course Bruce McConkie's "Mormon Doctrine" is official church doctrine. It's right there in the NAME of the book. case closed.

Anyone can publish any title they want, but if they want such to be officially recognized by an organization, they will publish under it's auspices. BRM's "Mormon Doctrine" is not published by the Church, case closed.

Post by **_Tim** » Wed Apr 18, 2012 6:41 pm

. . .and thus the LDS church is not a Christian church. It was not organized under the auspices of the Christian creeds. Anyone can put any title on their church that they want. But that doesn't mean they are officially recognized as "Christian". Case closed.

(I hope this little word game shows how shallow the "in the name" argument is)

Post by **_lulu** » Thu Apr 19, 2012 10:34 pm

bcspace wrote:
of course Bruce McConkie's "Mormon Doctrine" is official church doctrine. It's right there in the NAME of the book. case closed.

Anyone can publish any title they want, but if they want such to be officially recognized by an organization, they will publish under it's auspices. BRM's "Mormon Doctrine" is not published by the Church, case closed.

Auspices? Auspices? Is Deseret Book under the church's auspices?

Post by **_aranyborju** » Thu Apr 19, 2012 11:07 pm

bcspace wrote:Anyone can publish any title they want, but if they want such to be officially recognized by an organization, they will publish under it's auspices...

Or they will have themselves sustained as a leader and doctrinal source by the membership of said organization. oh wait...

Post by **_Corpsegrinder** » Thu Apr 19, 2012 11:59 pm

Tim wrote:of course Bruce McConkie's "Mormon Doctrine" is official church doctrine. It's right there in the NAME of the book. case closed.

An Evangelical accuses Mormons of believing a bunch of made-up bunk.

Pot. Kettle. Black.

Post by **_Tim** » Fri Apr 20, 2012 3:49 am

Corpsegrinder wrote:An Evangelical accuses Mormons of believing a bunch of made-up bunk.

Pot. Kettle. Black.

Bwah ha ha ha ha ha ha ha.

Oh man. (Wipes tears). I've got to go clean myself up. I soiled myself. That was just amazing. Where do you come up with quips like that? I especially liked how you accused me of saying something that I didn't say. Brilliant!

I got told.

Post by **_Corpsegrinder** » Fri Apr 20, 2012 4:39 am

Oh man. (Wipes tears). I've got to go clean myself up. I soiled myself.

Perhaps you need a bit more fiber in your diet.

I especially liked how you accused me of saying something that I didn't say.

No, you didn’t “say” it, but the inference was clear enough.

DiscussMormonism.com

of course it's "Mormon Doctrine"

of course it's "Mormon Doctrine"

Re: of course it's "Mormon Doctrine"

Re: of course it's "Mormon Doctrine"

Re: of course it's "Mormon Doctrine"

Re: of course it's "Mormon Doctrine"

Re: of course it's "Mormon Doctrine"

Re: of course it's "Mormon Doctrine"

Re: of course it's "Mormon Doctrine"

Re: of course it's "Mormon Doctrine"

Re: of course it's "Mormon Doctrine"