Internet rumor that Ed Decker is Hugh Nibley's

[_lulu]

illegitimate son.

Can anyone confirm or deny?

[_aranyborju]

This just isn't catching on for us lulu. Maybe we have to create a sock first, then respond to ourselves through another sock. It's the only way for a preposterous claim to generate serious discussion I think.

[_lulu]

This just isn't catching on for us lulu. Maybe we have to create a sock first, then respond to ourselves through another sock. It's the only way for a preposterous claim to generate serious discussion I think.

RAFLMAO

My narthex thing has never caught on either.

[_aranyborju]

My narthex thing has never caught on either.

I blame a poor education system for everyone's apparent ignorance of European architectural terminology.

[_lulu]

My narthex thing has never caught on either.

I blame a poor education system for everyone's apparent ignorance of European architectural terminology.

It much more closely associated with a church than "foyer" which could be part of about anything. No disputes over how to pronounce it. I wonder how we lost it? Shall we blame it on the French?

[_aranyborju]

Indeed. A worthy scapegoat.

[_lulu]

Indeed. A worthy scapegoat.

The cheese eaters.

I had an excellent grilled cheese at a diner the other day. The first time in years. But perhaps that is more English than French. It was a very good cheddar. The other person paid.

Ed Decker, the bastard, was no where in sight. I would have asked about his biological parentage if he was.

Do you think he might have treated had he been there?

[_Mercury]

This just isn't catching on for us lulu. Maybe we have to create a sock first, then respond to ourselves through another sock. It's the only way for a preposterous claim to generate serious discussion I think.

There is always claiming an angel told you the rumor. If you want to get it spread around that seems like a surefire way, at least in 1830.

[_ludwigm]

This just isn't catching on for us lulu. Maybe we have to create a sock first, then respond to ourselves through another sock. It's the only way for a preposterous claim to generate serious discussion I think.

There is always claiming an angel told you the rumor. If you want to get it spread around that seems like a surefire way, at least in 1830.

The same as today.

x of americans believe in god ("x" may be 80%, 84%, 78%, 92%, 86%, 85%, more than 9 of 10, majority)

https://www.google.com/search?as_epq=of ... eve+in+god

1,650,000,000 writer on Internet knows the correct spelling of "believe".
19,400,000 writer on Internet believe that this word is "beleive". It is less than 1.2%, there is some hope for the humanity. Not much of.

The rate on this site is 1.5%. (Search found 274 matches of 18412.)
We are not speshul.

[_Mercury]

The same as today.

x of americans believe in god ("x" may be 80%, 84%, 78%, 92%, 86%, 85%, more than 9 of 10, majority)

https://www.google.com/search?as_epq=of ... eve+in+god

1,650,000,000 writer on Internet knows the correct spelling of "believe".
19,400,000 writer on Internet believe that this word is "beleive". It is less than 1.2%, there is some hope for the humanity. Not much of.

The rate on this site is 1.5%. (Search found 274 matches of 18412.)
We are not speshul.

I think I could replace your posts with a very small shell script.