Blixa wrote:It's great when this board enables this, instead of enabling trolls.
+1
". . . but they must long feel that to flatter and follow others, without being flattered and followed in turn, is but a state of half enjoyment" - Jane Austen in "Persuasion"
J Green wrote:Aren't we still waiting for evidence that the Church has stated that publication is a mark of doctrine? Could we start there? Perhaps, as you have suggested before, we could look at the CHI as a test case of your "doctrine" thesis. Or even Duty to God.
Regards
Well said. I worked on several software manuals at the COB. Were the procedures and instructions doctrine? No, but they were consistent with doctrine in that they didn't contradict the church's doctrine. But even though they were basically nonreligious instruction manuals, they went through Correlation.
Ego is the reason bcspace has walked away from this thread
That is what you want me to do. I've already caught Runtu and Buffalo posting false and misleading quotes and references which they assume that none of the rest of you will research but merely take their word with no one to call their bluff. This is the standard antiMormon modus operandi. I don't feel an obligation to do this for every post or thread, but the frequency with which it occurs ought to be enough for you to come to the correct conclusion that all antiMormons are dishonest.
bcspace wrote:That is what you want me to do. I've already caught Runtu and Buffalo posting false and misleading quotes and references which they assume that none of the rest of you will research but merely take their word with no one to call their bluff.
CFR. You've shown no such thing. Again, stop lying.
This is the standard antiMormon modus operandi.
Is lying your standard modus operandi? What does that make you?
I don't feel an obligation to do this for every post or thread, but the frequency with which it occurs ought to be enough for you to come to the correct conclusion that all antiMormons are dishonest.
bcspace wrote:. . . all antiMormons are dishonest.
It begins.
Two households, both alike in dignity . . .
". . . but they must long feel that to flatter and follow others, without being flattered and followed in turn, is but a state of half enjoyment" - Jane Austen in "Persuasion"
Ego is the reason bcspace has walked away from this thread
That is what you want me to do. I've already caught Runtu and Buffalo posting false and misleading quotes and references which they assume that none of the rest of you will research but merely take their word with no one to call their bluff. This is the standard antiMormon modus operandi. I don't feel an obligation to do this for every post or thread, but the frequency with which it occurs ought to be enough for you to come to the correct conclusion that all antiMormons are dishonest.
CFR
This is the standard mopologetic modus operandi. Slander your opponents when you can't counter their arguments.
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.