Adventures in Cyber-Stalking: FAIR Wiki's Smear of Dehlin
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 8025
- Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 4:44 pm
Re: Adventures in Cyber-Stalking: FAIR Wiki's Smear of Dehli
I'm assuming that Wiki Wonka is busy in real life, and that this is the reason why the entry is still up. Or did he sign off on this? Is this what he means by "objectivity"? I can't help but wonder. J Green was on here not long ago, playing as if he's purely interested in scholarly talk and literary puns, though when pressed, he revealed himself to be the type of Mopologist who loves talking trash behind people's backs--i.e., he admitted to Dean Robbers that he would happily ridicule Rodney Meldrum behind the man's back. Is Wiki Wonka essentially the same way?
"[I]f, while hoping that everybody else will be honest and so forth, I can personally prosper through unethical and immoral acts without being detected and without risk, why should I not?." --Daniel Peterson, 6/4/14
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 21373
- Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:00 pm
Re: Adventures in Cyber-Stalking: FAIR Wiki's Smear of Dehli
Doctor Scratch wrote:I'm assuming that Wiki Wonka is busy in real life, and that this is the reason why the entry is still up. Or did he sign off on this? Is this what he means by "objectivity"? I can't help but wonder. J Green was on here not long ago, playing as if he's purely interested in scholarly talk and literary puns, though when pressed, he revealed himself to be the type of Mopologist who loves talking trash behind people's backs--i.e., he admitted to Dean Robbers that he would happily ridicule Rodney Meldrum behind the man's back. Is Wiki Wonka essentially the same way?
Well the sting of having the Dehlin smear pulled from the journal may result in them clinging to this digital swipe in order to salve their wounded egos.
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 8025
- Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 4:44 pm
Re: Adventures in Cyber-Stalking: FAIR Wiki's Smear of Dehli
I'm topping this thread, because it appears that FAIR has gone in and removed the attack on Dehlin--it seems to have been deleted from the Wiki entry. I'm kind of surprised by this, and it makes me wonder if they are simply following in lockstep after DCP was castigated for trying to publish a Dehlin "hit-piece" in the Review. It must irritate them enormously that Dehlin weilds so much power over them.
"[I]f, while hoping that everybody else will be honest and so forth, I can personally prosper through unethical and immoral acts without being detected and without risk, why should I not?." --Daniel Peterson, 6/4/14