The MYTH that the Bible "does not condemn slavery".....!

[_Themis]

Man anti-mormonism and liberalism truly ARE mental disorders. :(
Read it more SLOWLY and CAREFULLY......

Great. This thread gets moved here after ldsfaqs namecalls in Celestial where it is a violation of board rules.

How many time does this guy get to blatantly violate board rules before he's suspended or out on his ear? Why is he coddled so?

Because the mods are evil anti Mormons and don't want to ban those who make the church look so bad.

[_ldsfaqs]

Man anti-mormonism and liberalism truly ARE mental disorders. :(
Read it more SLOWLY and CAREFULLY......

Great. This thread gets moved here after ldsfaqs namecalls in Celestial where it is a violation of board rules.

How many time does this guy get to blatantly violate board rules before he's suspended or out on his ear? Why is he coddled so?

If you read with actual reading comprehension, you would know I didn't actually break the rules of the board. I made a "general" comment of behaviors, I didn't "name-call" anyone specific.

Further, if the rules were enforced as you like to believe they should be, nearly everyone on this forum, most of YOUR KIND would be gone. But, you conveniently ignore the personal attacks against LDS and otherwise.

I can't even count the amount of times I'm personally attacked, yet, I don't see YOU saying anything about it. And if you think I'm not ever personally attacked for my views (even when I'm not being critical of anyone), then you need to wake up.

[_Drifting]

If the Bible condemns slavery...how come the early Church leaders didn't condemn it?
In fact, how come Mormon doctrine officially supports slavery in that black people can only be servants in heaven?

Are you trying to show that Mormonism is not consistent with Bible teachings?

[_krose]

Ironically, the Bible is somewhat clearer in its denunciation of homosexual behavior than of slavery. No mixed messages, there.

Only for men.

[_Buffalo]

Ironically, the Bible is somewhat clearer in its denunciation of homosexual behavior than of slavery. No mixed messages, there.

Only for men.

It just goes to show, men have always had a soft spot for lesbians doin' it.

[_Corpsegrinder]

Ironically, the Bible is somewhat clearer in its denunciation of homosexual behavior than of slavery. No mixed messages, there.

Only for men.

You’re right, I stand corrected. Except for Paul, the Bible seems to give lesbianism a pass. The Bible’s moral and ethical inadequacy is truly breathtaking.

Abraham Lincoln: “The dogmas of the quiet past are inadequate to the stormy present. The occasion is piled high with difficulty, and we must rise with the occasion. As our case is new, so we must think anew and act anew.”

[_krose]

Just goes to show who wrote the Bible and made all those rules... dudes.

Men have always been viscerally reactive, sometimes violently so, toward male homosexuality, while mostly ignoring (or even encouraging) the female version. Only one qualifies as an "abomination."

After all, what guy can resist a little hot girl-on-girl action? Not even Yahweh, it seems.