jskains wrote:
Why don't you go and make fun of the Jewish Beanie hat?
JMS
Because they're nothing wrong with hats. Even small hats.
jskains wrote:
Why don't you go and make fun of the Jewish Beanie hat?
JMS
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.
B.R. McConkie, © Intellectual Reserve wrote:There are those who say that revealed religion and organic evolution can be harmonized. This is both false and devilish.
jskains wrote:It's easier to just say "Your characterization of ABC is wrong" and run off to a new topic.
Kishkumen wrote:Chap wrote:(my bold emphasis added)
The wonderful point about Facsimile 3 is that we indubitably have in front of us a readable version of an Egyptian document Joseph Smith actually translated.
And every damn' thing he said was wrong (Like Smith's 'Pharaoh' was Isis, and so on). Not much room for catalyst theory there.
I can quite understand why Paul goes on and on 'hammering in the nail' on this one.
As we can see on this and other threads, one can always pretend there is wiggle room even after the game over.
jskains wrote:You know what, Chris. I was building up a response, but I really don't think you'd listen. I post a lot of things, and the pathetic children of this board usually act just like Kevin Graham here. It's cheaper to just call someone an idiot or insult or character assassinate than to have a mature dialogue. It's easier to just say "Your characterization of ABC is wrong" and run off to a new topic. It's easier to just say someone is ignorant than to take the time to understand their view.
I am designing a competitive board to both here and MD. One that not only locks down namecalling, but also doesn't lock down free flow of ideas.
I know this place doesn't get the difference. Openness to ideas but stopping the namecalling and insults are both compatible goals.
Too bad Shades and his pals here are too blinded by hate to see it.
JMS
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.
B.R. McConkie, © Intellectual Reserve wrote:There are those who say that revealed religion and organic evolution can be harmonized. This is both false and devilish.
CaliforniaKid wrote:jskains wrote:It's easier to just say "Your characterization of ABC is wrong" and run off to a new topic.
My reasons for thinking your characterization is inaccurate are given in points 2 and 3. I'm sorry you feel I won't listen to you. I don't think you're an idiot, Josh, and I hope I never give you the impression that I do.
Buffalo wrote:jskains wrote:You know what, Chris. I was building up a response, but I really don't think you'd listen. I post a lot of things, and the pathetic children of this board usually act just like Kevin Graham here. It's cheaper to just call someone an idiot or insult or character assassinate than to have a mature dialogue. It's easier to just say "Your characterization of ABC is wrong" and run off to a new topic. It's easier to just say someone is ignorant than to take the time to understand their view.
I am designing a competitive board to both here and MD. One that not only locks down namecalling, but also doesn't lock down free flow of ideas.
I know this place doesn't get the difference. Openness to ideas but stopping the namecalling and insults are both compatible goals.
Too bad Shades and his pals here are too blinded by hate to see it.
JMS
You just know that Skains had a cogent response backed up with substantive evidence. But now we don't get the privilege of reading it!
jskains wrote:I am designing a competitive board to both here and MD. One that not only locks down namecalling, but also doesn't lock down free flow of ideas.
Sophocles wrote:jskains wrote:I am designing a competitive board to both here and MD. One that not only locks down namecalling, but also doesn't lock down free flow of ideas.
You mean this one?
Might want to work on weeding out the spambots.
Chap wrote:Hearing a sustained exposition of argument and evidence from jskains seems a bit like getting Tobin's favorite deity to say something to us. Some of us will have to wait all the way to the day of judgement.
But then we'll be sorry. Real sorry. Yeah.
jskains wrote:Chap wrote:Hearing a sustained exposition of argument and evidence from jskains seems a bit like getting Tobin's favorite deity to say something to us. Some of us will have to wait all the way to the day of judgement.
But then we'll be sorry. Real sorry. Yeah.
This is why discussions here are impossible. There is zero maturity, respect, or integrity. The reason I don't post is because there is no integrity here. Every time I try to say something, it is drowned out by attacks, mockery, and rhetoric, and I struggle to get heard above the noise.
It's usually compounded by Scratch running off like a little greedy child, looking for some snippet of the past he can drag up to further insult me.
JMS
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.
B.R. McConkie, © Intellectual Reserve wrote:There are those who say that revealed religion and organic evolution can be harmonized. This is both false and devilish.