Decent Post on Proof and Evidence at Sic et Non

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_RayAgostini

Re: Decent Post on Proof and Evidence at Sic et Non

Post by _RayAgostini »

Kishkumen wrote:Ray, I don't have allies. I don't belong to a team. Scratch and I may get into a fight tomorrow, a fight in which he threatens to reveal information about me. You just don't know. He's done it before. He may do it again. Darth and I have had pretty damned heated arguments over politics. We don't always agree. I doubt he considers me his bosom pal. I don't really understand this stuff about teams, and alliances, and who I am supposed to agree with and side with regardless of my personal opinion on a subject. It just seems so antithetical to the idea of being on MDB and loving the whole free speech atmosphere.

I think the real genius here is mercyngrace. Why, M&G explained in what I thought were very compelling words how, even though she is a follower of Christ, she doesn't have to go around the internetz defending Daniel Peterson from attacks. I think mercyngrace is awesome. She and I may differ on a lot of things, but I was totally with her on the idea of living the principles she believes in and not kowtowing to this baloney about the jersey you wear and which team you need to be on.

Liz is kinda like this too in her own way. She has friends. She helps her friends. She doesn't say, "well X is an ex-Mormon, so I have to be tougher on X than I am on Y," or vice versa.

Now, I think that you are right about the motives of some to destroy faith. They don't think believing in things they consider stupid to be a virtue on the part of the believer. I understand why that would be. At the same time, I am cynical to the point that I don't consider it to be an indisputable improvement when people stop believing in things that are not true, since they are liable to cling to something else that isn't true either. But there is more to it than that.

What I think is true is that we need to be always vigilant against the inhumanity of people against other people. This is something that knows no boundaries of belief or unbelief. It just is. People treat each other badly, sometimes spectacularly so. Again, I have been liking how mercyngrace is not about doing that, even when it means fighting the good fight for the cause of Team Peterson.

Now, I am not the best example of Christlike humanity or anywhere close, I grant you. I am a merciless tease who has an unruly sense of humor. I love to mock pomposity and sanctimony. It is a weakness of mine. At the same time, I try not to lose sight of the humanity of all of us--our shared suffering, beauty, and vulnerability. Why, I imagine I have had a kind thought and said a kind word about most of the people I have poked fun at and criticized. I don't want to be their enemies. I don't wish them ill.

So what if I find some arguments stupid and hate it when someone says mean stuff about Laura Compton for disagreeing with that old fart Boyd Packer? In the end we are all human beings. I refuse to reverence one any more than I do the other. I pray that I may never cease to be human and tolerant of all, ever striving not to harm others. Sometimes that latter part is sorely difficult for me, I'll admit. I do love to tease people.


I've never seen either Scratch or Darth express something "from the heart" as you just did. But I know you are an honest person. I've associated with you long enough to know that. Passionate, stubborn at times (aren't we all?), and opinionated (aren't we all?). And I know, and believe, that you have at heart the welfare of others, and that at least you would genuinely like to see attacks stop. I also firmly believe you have an open mind, but not so open as to absorb everything as "truth", but you're not inclined to mock that which you may not fully understand, or may not have fully investigated.

I don't see anything even near that sort of sincerity in Darth or Scratch. They are here overflowing with agendas.
_lulu
_Emeritus
Posts: 2310
Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2012 12:08 am

Re: Decent Post on Proof and Evidence at Sic et Non

Post by _lulu »

RayAgostini wrote:I've never seen either Scratch or Darth express something "from the heart" as you just did.
That's for exmormon.org :confused:
"And the human knew the source of life, the woman of him, and she conceived and bore Cain, and said, 'I have procreated a man with Yahweh.'" Gen. 4:1, interior quote translated by D. Bokovoy.
_Morley
_Emeritus
Posts: 3542
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 6:19 pm

Re: Decent Post on Proof and Evidence at Sic et Non

Post by _Morley »

lulu wrote:Please, for the love of an angel with a flaming sword, include the name of the person you are quoting.


Again.
_Darth J
_Emeritus
Posts: 13392
Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 12:16 am

Re: Decent Post on Proof and Evidence at Sic et Non

Post by _Darth J »

Simon Belmont wrote:First, we are currently on 4th ed. rules. 1st ed. rules are no longer used in official games.


I don't care about anything but 1st Edition. You know what's just a weird coincidence, though? In addition to having the exact same tone, the exact same writing style, and the exact same personal grudges as Simon Belmont, you also know all these obscure things about Dungeons & Dragons rules. That must be yet another random coincidence, since you most definitely are someone else.

Simon Belmont wrote: There are, in existence, literally hundreds of rule books (see: list of Dungeons and Dragons Rulebooks). As well, there are literally thousands of downloadable pre-built campaigns both from official sources and unofficial sources (see my links earlier in the thread). viewtopic.php?f=1&t=16725&p=408568


Second, even in 1st ed. "illusionist" is not a class, it is a sub-class as evidenced by your own quote.


I guess you missed the thing you quoted, where the title says: AD&D Character Class: Illusionist

I can see your reasoning here, though. Similarly, I refuse to acknowledge the LDS as a different religion than the FLDS or the LeBarons. They are all merely subsets of "Mormon."

First Edition Advanced Dungeons & Dragons™ Character Creation
AD&D Character Class: Illusionist

A sub-class of magic-users, illusionists have similar restrictions ........


Jesus Christ, Simon Belmont, can't you even get something right by accident?


LOL! Yup, you're always right. Keep telling yourself that while I keep using your extremely poor arguments and demonstrated lack of knowledge about almost everything as fodder for my next trip to the bathroom.


Our Dearest Heavenly Father,

Please let lots of people read what static/Radex/Simon Belmont/etc. writes, that they may know what being a vapid Mopologist zombie will do to them. Please also let lots of non-members read these posts and judge Mormons accordingly. Let them all see that defending Thy true church has deteriorated to the point where a pathetic Mopologist rent boy is trying to find a "gotcha" to score points against a critic by arguing about whether an illusionist being a subclass of magic user in 1st Edition AD&D really counts as an illusionist being a separate class.

In the name of Jesus Christ, amen.


By the way, my name is Stan. What's yours?




(Moderator Note) Please do not use potential in real life information and/or pictures to link with posters.
_static
_Emeritus
Posts: 102
Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2012 7:34 pm

Re: Decent Post on Proof and Evidence at Sic et Non

Post by _static »

Darth J wrote:I don't care about anything but 1st Edition.


Well that's convenient for you. Unfortunately, we live in the real world where fantasy evolves. I recommend you get with the times, Darth J.

I guess you missed the thing you quoted, where the title says: AD&D Character Class: Illusionist


Read up. It is a sub-class of the Magic-User base class.

I can see your reasoning here, though. Similarly, I refuse to acknowledge the LDS as a different religion than the FLDS or the LeBarons. They are all merely subsets of "Mormon."


Good for you.

Our Dearest Heavenly Father,

Please let lots of people read what static/Radex/Simon Belmont/etc. writes, that they may know what being a vapid Mopologist zombie will do to them. Please also let lots of non-members read these posts and judge Mormons accordingly. Let them all see that defending Thy true church has deteriorated to the point where a pathetic Mopologist rent boy is trying to find a "gotcha" to score points against a critic by arguing about whether an illusionist being a subclass of magic user in 1st Edition AD&D really counts as an illusionist being a separate class.

In the name of Jesus Christ, amen.


Your immediate reaction when anyone points out your flawed arguments and incorrect knowledge is anger. I don't think that's healthy, Mr. Darth J. Relax a bit. Have some fun. I sure am!

Here's my picture:

Image


Well, you look like such a gentle fellow. Does the Internet just bring out the worst in you, or what?
- Stan
_Darth J
_Emeritus
Posts: 13392
Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 12:16 am

Re: Decent Post on Proof and Evidence at Sic et Non

Post by _Darth J »

RayAgostini wrote: Blah blah blah Allāhu Akbar!


Ray:

DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING AT ALL TO CONTRIBUTE TO THIS THREAD THAT PERTAINS IN SOME TANGENTIAL WAY TO THE OP?
_Darth J
_Emeritus
Posts: 13392
Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 12:16 am

Re: Decent Post on Proof and Evidence at Sic et Non

Post by _Darth J »

Simon Belmont wrote: Image


static/Radex/Simon Belmont/oxygenadam/etc.

DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING AT ALL TO CONTRIBUTE TO THIS THREAD THAT PERTAINS IN SOME TANGENTIAL WAY TO THE OP?
_RayAgostini

Re: Decent Post on Proof and Evidence at Sic et Non

Post by _RayAgostini »

Darth J wrote:
RayAgostini wrote: Blah blah blah Allāhu Akbar!


Ray:

DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING AT ALL TO CONTRIBUTE TO THIS THREAD THAT PERTAINS IN SOME TANGENTIAL WAY TO THE OP?


I have. I've exposed you and Scratch as hypocrites and deceivers. Making people think that you're "interested in their welfare", when both of you are brimming with deceptive agendas. Hard of heart, mind and soul.

And amazingly, you continue to verify it with every post you do.
_Darth J
_Emeritus
Posts: 13392
Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 12:16 am

Re: Decent Post on Proof and Evidence at Sic et Non

Post by _Darth J »

RayAgostini wrote:
Darth J wrote:
Ray:

DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING AT ALL TO CONTRIBUTE TO THIS THREAD THAT PERTAINS IN SOME TANGENTIAL WAY TO THE OP?


I have. I've exposed you and Scratch as hypocrites and deceivers. Making people think that you're "interested in their welfare", when both of you are brimming with deceptive agendas. Hard of heart, mind and soul.

And amazingly, you continue to verify it with every post you do.


I see you continue to favor making crap up and running with it.

See, the thing is, I've never said I'm interested in people's welfare in the way you're suggesting.

But as far as exposing the agenda that neither Scratch nor I like Moplogetics very much, that is some top-notch detective work, Sherlock. You must have really scoured the board's archives to put all the clues together like that.

However, this thread is about proof and evidence, not calling people hypocrites when they have never adopted the goals you impute to them. So the answer to my question is no.
_RayAgostini

Re: Decent Post on Proof and Evidence at Sic et Non

Post by _RayAgostini »

Darth J wrote:I see you continue to favor making s*** up and running with it.

See, the thing is, I've never said I'm interested in people's welfare in the way you're suggesting.

But as far as exposing the agenda that neither Scratch nor I like Moplogetics very much, that is some top-notch detective work, Sherlock. You must have really scoured the board's archives to put all the clues together like that.

However, this thread is about proof and evidence, not calling people hypocrites when they have never adopted the goals you impute to them. So the answer to my question is no.


Make crap up? Both you and Scratch are deceiving scum of the first order. Both liars.
Post Reply