why me wrote: But I should have played it smart and let the thread run its course. But...I took the bait.
It's nice to know there are some things in life one can count on.
Frankly, I was upset at not being able to respond to your ridiculous attacks on M&G at MDDB because of my being banned, and so I carefully conceived and executed a plan to lure you out here so I could tell you what I think.
Yet across the gulf of space, minds that are to our minds as ours are to those of the beasts that perish, intellects vast and cool and unsympathetic, regarded this earth with envious eyes, and slowly and surely drew their plans against us.
All the Best!
--Consiglieri
You prove yourself of the devil and anti-mormon every word you utter, because only the devil perverts facts to make their case.--ldsfaqs (6-24-13)
consiglieri wrote:Frankly, I was upset at not being able to respond to your ridiculous attacks on M&G at MDDB because of my being banned,
The MAD board:
They banned consiglieri.
They kept whyme.
What more need be said?
Zadok: I did not have a faith crisis. I discovered that the Church was having a truth crisis. Maksutov: That's the problem with this supernatural stuff, it doesn't really solve anything. It's a placeholder for ignorance.
Wiki Wonka wrote: This type of nonsensical post is representative of why I believe that apologetics have no place on message boards. This attitude completely contradicts the scriptures and everything that we are taught in Church. I wish that every online LDS poster was like M&G.
You have absolutely got to be kidding me.
WW
Here was my problem:Mercyngrace came to MDD and lectured the defenders about behavior and higher standards. But she refuses to give the same lecture to the critics here. Thus, my problem. Being a critic does not give one the permission to lower their standards to an ape. Likewise, defenders of Mormonism can take to task critics for bashing or mocking the LDS church. And they can certainly engage them in hard hitting debate without a lecture from Mercyngrace.
And that was my point. I have not seen Mercyngrace defend the LDS church against the critics on this board. But since I am not monitoring her posts, she may have done so. But I haven't seen it.
When was the last time, or any time for that matter, that you took a Mormon defender or apologist to task for anything?
That anything could range from a slight snarky comment up to and including blatant personal attacks and lying.
café crema wrote: On CAF he constantly excoriated Catholics to admonish their fellow Catholics on their (according to why me) uncharitable, un-Catholic and un-Christlike behavior.
This is true. The antimormons are CAF were terrible and very uncatholic. They mocked and bashed the LDS faith and mocked LDS posters. They were uncharitable. But I am not alone in my opinion. Many catholics share my opinion and some have posted on MDD about it. And you...never took the haters to task. And taliban catholics are still bashing Mormonism with uncharitble comments. And this is why your words ring hollow. You do not chastise your fellow catholic posters for such unchristlike behavior.
And the anti-Catholics on CAF were terrible, and very un-mormon. They were uncharitable, and were banned.
But wait, you should know that.....you were one of them.
mercyngrace wrote: So not only is your accusation false, you have met your own standard by participating in baseless personal attacks upon a faithful member and defender of the church. By your own measuring stick, you are a hypocrite.
I don't think that you know what a personal attack is. Read this thread and see what people have said about me. Then, you will read some personal attacks.
Taking you to task is not a personal attack. It is calling a person a name or making terrible personable accusations about someone plus other things that can be called a personal attack.
Truth and facts are not personal attacks.
You really should get up to speed on your persecution cards.
