Daniel Peterson wrote:The issue in this regard is about my use of a quotation from Albert Camus. It's been claimed that I misrepresented Camus's position. Even if true, though, that wouldn't make me guilty of uncivil behavior, which is, I believe, the topic of this thread. The two are distinct issues. I can still be sweet, even if utterly incompetent.
http://www.mormondialogue.org/topic/577 ... 1209123195
So I guess he's admitted to fouling up, eh? Good for him. And he's right: it is possible to "be sweet" and "incompetent" at the same time. Of course, when you're being "incompetent" in the service of a viciously polemical essay that tries to tar and discredit your ideological enemies, I would hardly call that "sweet."