Critical analysis of the stone box

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_SteelHead
_Emeritus
Posts: 8261
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 1:40 am

Re: Critical analysis of the stone box

Post by _SteelHead »

The whole history of the stone box and the gold plates is a study in incompetence, futility, and mootness.

The box, as it is superfluous baggage. Why store the plates in a box, when Moroni at diverse times transported them between physical locations, and in and out of heaven? Why bury such a treasure in the ground instead of storing them in heaven and delivering them as needed...... but when were they really needed?

The plates as they were by the best evidence, never actually used for "translation". Why even have plates? Why not just have whole scale revelations from the seer stones. Making the box doubly futile. The whole inefficiency of the process is a study in the incompetence of Mormon Jesus.

This history while incredibly incompetent is consistent with magic believing, stone looking, treasure hunting Joseph, turning the con into a better paying gig.
Last edited by Guest on Thu May 24, 2012 11:16 pm, edited 4 times in total.
It is better to be a warrior in a garden, than a gardener at war.

Some of us, on the other hand, actually prefer a religion that includes some type of correlation with reality.
~Bill Hamblin
_Quasimodo
_Emeritus
Posts: 11784
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 1:11 am

Re: Critical analysis of the stone box

Post by _Quasimodo »

zeezrom wrote:Now why would you hate to disagree with me? I'm glad for your criticism! It means you care about my work! Like you said, water is a concern and particularly where it freezes and thaws each year. Stone is very good at resisting compression but not tension, which would be exerted under conditions found on Cumorah.

I stand by my claim that the walls must be thick because this is a buried vault in those soil/weather conditions and in an area of moderate seismic activity.

Where was this box you mention stored? Was it buried in the earth?


I hate to disagree with you becuse you are usually correct and I end up looking foolish :biggrin: .

In this case you are also correct. The freezing and thawing would have a big effect on the stone. Something that I neglected to take into consideration.

Here's an image of my medieval kitchen knife along with a well used modern chef's knife. It's interesting how similar they are. The back of the old one is about 4 times as thick as the new one, however. I'm guessing that Laban's sword would have been in the ground for a thousand years longer and would have looked correspondingly rougher.

Image
This, or any other post that I have made or will make in the future, is strictly my own opinion and consequently of little or no value.

"Faith is believing something you know ain't true" Twain.
_ludwigm
_Emeritus
Posts: 10158
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 8:07 am

Re: Critical analysis of the stone box

Post by _ludwigm »

Sophocles wrote:"Bigger on the inside" could also indicate time lord technology.

No.

It is foot binding.
Image

by the way "as far as it is translated correctly"
(simplified Chinese: 缠足; traditional Chinese: 纏足; Mandarin Pinyin: chánzú; Jyutping: gwo2 goek3; literally "bound feet" or Chinese: 縛腳; Pe̍h-ōe-jī: pa̍k-kha)

by the way "some elderly Chinese women still survive today with disabilities related to their bound feet"
- Whenever a poet or preacher, chief or wizard spouts gibberish, the human race spends centuries deciphering the message. - Umberto Eco
- To assert that the earth revolves around the sun is as erroneous as to claim that Jesus was not born of a virgin. - Cardinal Bellarmine at the trial of Galilei
_Polygamy-Porter
_Emeritus
Posts: 8091
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 1:07 am

Re: Critical analysis of the stone box

Post by _Polygamy-Porter »

beefcalf wrote:
SteelHead wrote:See the jskains quote in my Sig. God just created a gold that was lighter than normal gold. Crisis averted!


what a frickin' rabbit hole...

Lemme guess, Laban's sword was similarly made of a rubber/bronze alloy, thereby enabling it to fit all coiled up inside that tiny stone box.

Image
New name: Boaz
The most viewed "ignored" poster in Shady Acres® !
_krose
_Emeritus
Posts: 2555
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 1:18 pm

Re: Critical analysis of the stone box

Post by _krose »

Doctor CamNC4Me wrote:Where is the stone box?

jskains wrote:In Heaven with the plates.

Whenever I hear the "taken to heaven" explanation for the plates, I wonder what they are talking about.

In Mormonism, "heaven," in the sense of a final reward, refers to the Celestial Kingdom. I understand the CK will be here on Earth when it turns to crystal sometime in the future, not some separate physical place that exists now. So surely that can't be the plates' location.

Perhaps they are thinking of the Spirit World, which is what Mormon parents mean when they say "Grandma is in heaven." But I thought that was some kind of hidden spiritual dimension, not a physical place where a physical object could hide.

So I have to conclude that when people say this, they must mean the plates were taken to Kolob, "the place where God resides." Kolob must be where Moroni was based, and where he beamed from every time he needed to appear to Smith?

So why don't they just say the plates are on Kolob, instead of using the inaccurate Protestant "heaven" term?
"The DNA of fictional populations appears to be the most susceptible to extinction." - Simon Southerton
_zeezrom
_Emeritus
Posts: 11938
Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2009 8:57 pm

Re: Critical analysis of the stone box

Post by _zeezrom »

SteelHead wrote:The whole history of the stone box and the gold plates is a study in incompetence, futility, and mootness.

hey!

This is my one little chance for fame, man! The stone box and Zee is like the Book of Abraham scroll and Chris Smith, or the Book of Mormon translation and Uncle Dale. Or like MMM and Blixa.

Okay, I let my head grow a little much.

But can't I have a study in more than futility here?
Oh for shame, how the mortals put the blame on us gods, for they say evils come from us, but it is they, rather, who by their own recklessness win sorrow beyond what is given... Zeus (1178 BC)

The Holy Sacrament.
_Quasimodo
_Emeritus
Posts: 11784
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 1:11 am

Re: Critical analysis of the stone box

Post by _Quasimodo »

zeezrom wrote:
SteelHead wrote:The whole history of the stone box and the gold plates is a study in incompetence, futility, and mootness.

hey!

This is my one little chance for fame, man! The stone box and Zee is like the Book of Abraham scroll and Chris Smith, or the Book of Mormon translation and Uncle Dale. Or like MMM and Blixa.

Okay, I let my head grow a little much.

But can't I have a study in more than futility here?


Bask in the glory!!!!
This, or any other post that I have made or will make in the future, is strictly my own opinion and consequently of little or no value.

"Faith is believing something you know ain't true" Twain.
_DrW
_Emeritus
Posts: 7222
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 2:57 am

Re: Critical analysis of the stone box

Post by _DrW »

zeezrom wrote:
SteelHead wrote:The whole history of the stone box and the gold plates is a study in incompetence, futility, and mootness.

hey!

This is my one little chance for fame, man! The stone box and Zee is like the Book of Abraham scroll and Chris Smith, or the Book of Mormon translation and Uncle Dale. Or like MMM and Blixa.

Okay, I let my head grow a little much.

But can't I have a study in more than futility here?


Zee,

Your stone box analysis is relevant, incisive and devastating.

Since you are already famous, though, don't know how much it will help to make you better known or more iconic.

Feel better? :biggrin:
David Hume: "---Mistakes in philosophy are merely ridiculous, those in religion are dangerous."

DrW: "Mistakes in science are learning opportunities and are eventually corrected."
_tapirrider
_Emeritus
Posts: 893
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2011 8:10 am

Re: Critical analysis of the stone box

Post by _tapirrider »

The stone box description of Joseph Smith is just another clue for me that he was describing an Indian grave. There was nothing magical about it. He was a grave robber. It also reveals from an archaeological perspective that the Book of Mormon timeline of when the plates were buried is B.S. The use of stone box graves became prevalent about 400 years after the plates were supposed to have been buried.

A STUDY OF STONE BOX GRAVES IN EASTERN NORTH AMERICA. Ian W. Brown.
Tennessee Anthropologist VI(1):2-26. 1981
_DrW
_Emeritus
Posts: 7222
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 2:57 am

Re: Critical analysis of the stone box

Post by _DrW »

tapirrider wrote:The stone box description of Joseph Smith is just another clue for me that he was describing an Indian grave. There was nothing magical about it. He was a grave robber. It also reveals from an archaeological perspective that the Book of Mormon timeline of when the plates were buried is B.S. The use of stone box graves became prevalent about 400 years after the plates were supposed to have been buried.

A STUDY OF STONE BOX GRAVES IN EASTERN NORTH AMERICA. Ian W. Brown.
Tennessee Anthropologist VI(1):2-26. 1981

Thanks.

A good quality color image of a couple of these stone box graves, as they appeared a few years ago, can be seen on Page 16 of this article:

http://www.sitemason.com/files/g2RsMo/volume5issue1.pdf

It is clear from these examples what shape the (copper gold alloy) golden plates, the sword of Laban and the Urim and Thummim would have been in by the early 19th century, had they been deposited in such a stone box by Moroni 1400 years ago.
David Hume: "---Mistakes in philosophy are merely ridiculous, those in religion are dangerous."

DrW: "Mistakes in science are learning opportunities and are eventually corrected."
Post Reply