Our beloved nevermos

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_Chap
_Emeritus
Posts: 14190
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 10:23 am

Re: Our beloved nevermos

Post by _Chap »

zeezrom wrote:... the dear chap ....


Why, that is really kind of you.
Zadok:
I did not have a faith crisis. I discovered that the Church was having a truth crisis.
Maksutov:
That's the problem with this supernatural stuff, it doesn't really solve anything. It's a placeholder for ignorance.
_CaliforniaKid
_Emeritus
Posts: 4247
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 8:47 am

Re: Our beloved nevermos

Post by _CaliforniaKid »

Chap wrote:Why, that is really kind of you.

haha! Are you a nevermo, Chap? I'm not sure you've ever told us your story. In any case, I've learned a great deal from your posts, which are always both very smart and very friendly. A surprisingly rare combination of virtues.
_why me
_Emeritus
Posts: 9589
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 8:19 pm

Re: Our beloved nevermos

Post by _why me »

Interestingly, most of the nevermos are antimormon. They lurk on Mormon boards, not wanting to see any positives about the LDS church and go to their home boards and post antimormon posts thereby contributing to the misunderstanding that others have of Mormons and Mormonism. My catholic friends on this board are a case in point.

Now if we had some nevermos who are positive about the LDS church, it may help the tone around here.
I intend to lay a foundation that will revolutionize the whole world.
Joseph Smith


We are “to feed the hungry, to clothe the naked, to provide for the widow, to dry up the tear of the orphan, to comfort the afflicted, whether in this church, or in any other, or in no church at all…”
Joseph Smith
_why me
_Emeritus
Posts: 9589
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 8:19 pm

Re: Our beloved nevermos

Post by _why me »

CaliforniaKid wrote:Thanks, zee! The whyme bit made me laugh. :)


Zee is jealous that he never had a Mormon lay when he was young and horny. :mrgreen:
I intend to lay a foundation that will revolutionize the whole world.
Joseph Smith


We are “to feed the hungry, to clothe the naked, to provide for the widow, to dry up the tear of the orphan, to comfort the afflicted, whether in this church, or in any other, or in no church at all…”
Joseph Smith
_Drifting
_Emeritus
Posts: 7306
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 10:52 am

Re: Our beloved nevermos

Post by _Drifting »

bcspace wrote:Jesus is Mormon. From the very beginning in fact.


And yet, mistakenly, people called him King of the Jews.
Were Jews Mormon back then?
“We look to not only the spiritual but also the temporal, and we believe that a person who is impoverished temporally cannot blossom spiritually.”
Keith McMullin - Counsellor in Presiding Bishopric

"One, two, three...let's go shopping!"
Thomas S Monson - Prophet, Seer, Revelator
_Chap
_Emeritus
Posts: 14190
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 10:23 am

Re: Our beloved nevermos

Post by _Chap »

CaliforniaKid wrote:
Chap wrote:Why, that is really kind of you.

haha! Are you a nevermo, Chap? I'm not sure you've ever told us your story. In any case, I've learned a great deal from your posts, which are always both very smart and very friendly. A surprisingly rare combination of virtues.


Gosh, thanks, same to you ... "As, ladling butter from alternate tubs, Stubbs butter'd Freeman, Freeman butter'd Stubbs".

Indeed, I have never been a member of the CoJCoLDS or any other Mormon church. For various reasons, I prefer to operate under heavy protection against the risk of any in real life disclosure - partly to avoid problems, and partly because I think it makes for more interesting and fairer discussions if posts have to stand entirely on their own merits, without anybody being able to say "But I must be right, I have a Masters in XXXX from YYYYY".

But there is nothing risky about saying that I had a fairly lengthy and intense involvement with belief in a version of Christianity that might be called Episcopalian. I was, I think, an effective amateur apologist for mainstream Christianity, and knew good answers to most objections. But the point came where I asked myself whether that was enough, and whether I could think of a good reason why I would have invested myself in this system of belief and worship if I had not been born into it. And yes, every objection can be answered, but why are there so many that need to be answered?

Why do I find Mormonism interesting? Well, I think it is a wonderful example of how it is no fatal disadvantage to a religious movement if its basic fact-claims are so implausible that any impartial and uncommitted outsider would dismiss them as at best the product of self-deception, or at worst the result of simple fraud, and if its doctrinal claims are deeply incoherent. So long as people learn the religion when they are kids, they will not see the problems unless someone forces them on their attention - and then they may well refuse to see them.

That has helped me enormously, since I now realize that my previous commitment to an at least superficially less problematic set of factual and doctrinal claims was basically an example of the same phenomenon. Re-adopting my previous form of Christian belief would be the same kind of thing as my choosing to become a Mormon. And that I am not about to do!
Zadok:
I did not have a faith crisis. I discovered that the Church was having a truth crisis.
Maksutov:
That's the problem with this supernatural stuff, it doesn't really solve anything. It's a placeholder for ignorance.
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: Our beloved nevermos

Post by _harmony »

why me wrote:Interestingly, most of the nevermos are antimormon. They lurk on Mormon boards, not wanting to see any positives about the LDS church and go to their home boards and post antimormon posts thereby contributing to the misunderstanding that others have of Mormons and Mormonism. My catholic friends on this board are a case in point.

Now if we had some nevermos who are positive about the LDS church, it may help the tone around here.


Wrong.
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_Yoda

Re: Our beloved nevermos

Post by _Yoda »

why me wrote:Interestingly, most of the nevermos are antimormon. They lurk on Mormon boards, not wanting to see any positives about the LDS church and go to their home boards and post antimormon posts thereby contributing to the misunderstanding that others have of Mormons and Mormonism. My catholic friends on this board are a case in point.

Now if we had some nevermos who are positive about the LDS church, it may help the tone around here.

Ms. Jack, Ceeboo, and Chris Smith have all had positive things to say about the LDS Church. They also "call things as they see them" as far as the negative impressions of the Church that they have. However, they are very even-handed. I would not classify any of these folks as anti-Mormon.
_Kishkumen
_Emeritus
Posts: 21373
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:00 pm

Re: Our beloved nevermos

Post by _Kishkumen »

Chap wrote:Why do I find Mormonism interesting? Well, I think it is a wonderful example of how it is no fatal disadvantage to a religious movement if its basic fact-claims are so implausible that any impartial and uncommitted outsider would dismiss them as at best the product of self-deception, or at worst the result of simple fraud, and if its doctrinal claims are deeply incoherent. So long as people learn the religion when they are kids, they will not see the problems unless someone forces them on their attention - and then they may well refuse to see them.

That has helped me enormously, since I now realize that my previous commitment to an at least superficially less problematic set of factual and doctrinal claims was basically an example of the same phenomenon. Re-adopting my previous form of Christian belief would be the same kind of thing as my choosing to become a Mormon. And that I am not about to do!


I had no idea that Chap is a nevermo. Huh! Well, I obviously have not been paying close enough attention. Also, I have to say that his explanation for why Mormonism is interesting is one of the best I have read. It rings so true to me. Of course, with religion, wild claims have never been an impediment to the deepest devotion. Indeed, the wilder the claim, the deeper the devotion may become. As P.T. Barnum once said, there's a sucker born every minute. And, I add, I (insert your own name here, just like I do) am the biggest sucker of all. If everyone kept that in mind, and did not get on their high horse, the world would be a much friendlier place.
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
_Kishkumen
_Emeritus
Posts: 21373
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:00 pm

Re: Our beloved nevermos

Post by _Kishkumen »

liz3564 wrote:
why me wrote:Interestingly, most of the nevermos are antimormon. They lurk on Mormon boards, not wanting to see any positives about the LDS church and go to their home boards and post antimormon posts thereby contributing to the misunderstanding that others have of Mormons and Mormonism. My catholic friends on this board are a case in point.

Now if we had some nevermos who are positive about the LDS church, it may help the tone around here.

Ms. Jack, Ceeboo, and Chris Smith have all had positive things to say about the LDS Church. They also "call things as they see them" as far as the negative impressions of the Church that they have. However, they are very even-handed. I would not classify any of these folks as anti-Mormon.


why me has always been a great barometer for kindness, fairness, and wisdom for me, so long as I remember which side of the meter he resides on. It's really not that difficult to do.
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
Post Reply