The Peterson/Schryver Inquisition

[_cafe crema]

The manner in which he participates in apologetics is a window to his character.

Yes, but Kishkumen doesn't see it.

Kish doesn't participate in apologetics???

[_Kishkumen]

One of your friends? Poor, poor you. It must hurt. You and alter-ego Scratchie turned a whole board against Dan Peterson. But let me see if I have a satchel of crocodile tears I can shed for you.

So, you are saying that I have turned...

you
bcspace
liz
Droopy
why me
Nevo
asbestosman
Simon Belmont
J Green
static
stemelbow
etc., etc.

against Daniel Peterson. Well, I had no idea that I was capable of doing something I never intended to do so effectively that even people who show no evidence of being affected by it secretly are what you claim.

God knows that Daniel Peterson's own activities could never have influenced anyone to think negatively of anything he does and thus not like him particularly. It must be all my fault.

Scratch all over.

Empty attack.

[_RayAgostini]

Kish doesn't participate in apologetics???

No. He only lectures from his poly-wants-a-cracker- parrot podium on how it should be done.

Isn't that the ultimate irony?

[_Kishkumen]

Scratch all over. It just bleeds Scratch, no matter where you "scratch" it.

You guys are obsessed with Scratch without my help. Obviously.

[_cafe crema]

One of your friends? Poor, poor you. It must hurt. You and alter-ego Scratchie turned a whole board against Dan Peterson. But let me see if I have a satchel of crocodile tears I can shed for you.

So, you are saying that I have turned...

you
bcspace
liz
Droopy
why me
Nevo
asbestosman
Simon Belmont
J Green
static
stemelbow
etc., etc.

against Daniel Peterson. Well, I had no idea that I was capable of doing something I never intended to do so effectively that even people who show no evidence of being affected by it secretly are what you claim.

God knows that Daniel Peterson's own activities could never have influenced anyone to think negatively of anything he does and thus not like him particularly. It must be all my fault.

Scratch all over.

Empty attack.

You ARE amazing

[_Kishkumen]

No. He only lectures from his poly-wants-a-cracker- parrot podium on how it should be done.

Isn't that the ultimate irony?

Yes, no one has any right to criticize any aspect of LDS apologetics, least of all me. After all, I have only interacted with LDS apologists for close to two decades. What the hell would I know about it?

Geez!

[_RayAgostini]

So, you are saying that I have turned...

you
bcspace
liz
Droopy
why me
Nevo
asbestosman
Simon Belmont
J Green
static
stemelbow
etc., etc.

against Daniel Peterson. Well, I had no idea that I was capable of doing something I never intended to do so effectively that even people who show no evidence of being affected by it secretly are what you claim.

God knows that Daniel Peterson's own activities could never have influenced anyone to think negatively of anything he does and thus not like him particularly. It must be all my fault.

Scratch all over.

Empty attack.

Scratch all over. Anti-Dan to the very end, and the end is near.

[_Kishkumen]

Scratch all over. Anti-Dan to the very end, and the end is near.

End to what? Your sudden onset of lunacy?

I think we would all welcome that, probably even Daniel.

[_RayAgostini]

End to what? Your sudden onset of lunacy?

I think we would all welcome that, probably even Daniel.

I can't say I wish you well, Doctor Scratch.

[_cafe crema]

Kish doesn't participate in apologetics???

No. He only lectures from his poly-wants-a-cracker- parrot podium on how it should be done.

Isn't that the ultimate irony?

I don't see any sense in what you've said here?? And I don't see DCP doing it nicely. I've been treated sarcastically by the Dan and don't see why he is above criticism in the way he treats people. But he's a tough old bird and really doesn't need anyone to defend him, he take that responsibility on himself, for better or worse. I think worse.