RayAgostini wrote:café crema wrote:I'm tired but I don't think it was Ray who called everyone "liar", it's just there, was it Yahoo, no, but I can't remember who, who is it?? Seriously I can't remember who it is that calls everyone a liar, darn.
Scratch, but only if you disagree with him. Like Kiskumen, you know?
Kishkumen wrote:
I'll care about what you think when you recover your faculties. I'm patient.
Kishkumen wrote:Well, this has been an especially unfun night's exchange. It is past 1:30am where I live, so I am going to try to get a little sleep after having a longtime friend completely turn on me, accuse me of being an awful person, a liar etc.
Fun times... NOT.
Cheers, Ray. I hope you get this sorted out. I am not sure I can help you.
RayAgostini wrote:I don't want you, nor your friendship. Why not now tell everyone here what your "plans" were for "uncovering Scratch's identity".
I'll leave you at liberty to reveal that, and will say no more.
RayAgostini wrote:Look in the mirror before you go to bed, Scratch.
Kishkumen wrote:
Well, at one time I was bent on discovering who Scratch was so I could bring an end to his reign of terror. I think this was after wrangling with him in a huge fight here on MDB, that may have started with me defending Daniel or some such. I don't recall exactly. I communicated with you off-board over it for a while, but ultimately I lost interest in the project. I recall us speculating, coming up with theories, trying to pull information together, seeing what we could do to come up with more. I was really "into" it for a while.
I admit that I am still dying to know who Scratch is. I probably wouldn't reveal the information if I knew it, but he certainly has never trusted me with sufficient information for me to get it right. I even tried figuring it out directly with him. He just laughed as I threw out guesses.
He is probably right not to trust me with the information if he really wants to remain anonymous forever.
RayAgostini wrote:café crema wrote:I don't see any sense in what you've said here?? And I don't see DCP doing it nicely. I've been treated sarcastically by the Dan and don't see why he is above criticism in the way he treats people. But he's a tough old bird and really doesn't need anyone to defend him, he take that responsibility on himself, for better or worse. I think worse.
I'm beginning to think that why me was right about you.
Kishkumen wrote:Oh stop being a dipstick already.
Again, good night.
Hopefully things will look brighter for all of us in the morning. It has been a tough day for me, and the events on this board were just a small part of that.
RayAgostini wrote:Kishkumen wrote:
Well, at one time I was bent on discovering who Scratch was so I could bring an end to his reign of terror. I think this was after wrangling with him in a huge fight here on MDB, that may have started with me defending Daniel or some such. I don't recall exactly. I communicated with you off-board over it for a while, but ultimately I lost interest in the project. I recall us speculating, coming up with theories, trying to pull information together, seeing what we could do to come up with more. I was really "into" it for a while.
I admit that I am still dying to know who Scratch is. I probably wouldn't reveal the information if I knew it, but he certainly has never trusted me with sufficient information for me to get it right. I even tried figuring it out directly with him. He just laughed as I threw out guesses.
He is probably right not to trust me with the information if he really wants to remain anonymous forever.
Yet you still support and defend him, and you both have it out for DCP's scalp. And you don't even know who he is (Scratch)? You make Mr. Magoo look good. You were not only "into it", but you betrayed confidences I gave you, to Scratch.
You were always on his side, and you'd be on any side which slanders and defames the character of Daniel Peterson.
Away with you. Just be gone. You're not a fair person.
