DarkHelmet wrote:This guy makes an interesting point. Why are Mormons so desperate to be accepted as Christians?
I have no problem with the assertion that Mormons are to Christians what Christians are to Jews, which the author David Mason seemed to argue. I think the problem is that Biblical Christians seem to think that their faith is a
legitimate successor to Judaism, whereas they proclaim that my faith is
not a legitimate successor to Christianity.
Also, the thing I keep coming back to is the
dictionary definition. I look
Christian up at "www.dictionary.com" and I get, "1. of, pertaining to, or derived from Jesus Christ or His teachings:
a Christian faith; 2. of, pertaining to, believing in, or belonging to the religion based on the teachings of Jesus Christ:
Spain is a Christian country; 3. of or pertaining to Christians:
many Christian deaths in the Crusades; 4. exhibiting a spirit proper to a follower of Jesus Christ; Christlike:
She displayed true Christian charity; 5. decent; respectable:
They gave him a good Christian burial.
So my question is, why should I believe Biblical Christians have more of a right to define the term
Christian than the dictionary does?