3sheets2thewind wrote: Go start a thread about how Bradford is not temple worthy ....you colossal douchebag.
See my point, cwald? This is usual for this board for any defender of the church.
whyme, you do remember that you posted Bradfords action was apstate or apostacy, don't you? whyme, you do remember that you posted Bradford was not Temple worthy, don't you?
Please whyme, how are you "defender of the church" when you go about literally judging the worthiness of others?
Your conduct related to Bradford, does in fact, qualify you as a douche-bag.
Your conduct related to Bradford, in no way or by the utmost farthing, allows you claim "defender of the Church".
Why me hasn't caught up on the conference version of the Ensign so he hasn't heard Uchdorf say "stop it!".
“We look to not only the spiritual but also the temporal, and we believe that a person who is impoverished temporally cannot blossom spiritually.” Keith McMullin - Counsellor in Presiding Bishopric
"One, two, three...let's go shopping!" Thomas S Monson - Prophet, Seer, Revelator
3sheets2thewind wrote: whyme, you do remember that you posted Bradfords action was apstate or apostacy, don't you? whyme, you do remember that you posted Bradford was not Temple worthy, don't you? .
Of course we are selective in our reading understanding. Here was my position: I find sending an email firing someone to be offensive and when it is done inside a church institution it is even more offensive. I also said, that I consider such an action worse than a sexual fling. That being the case, I would consider it to be a problem with temple worthiness because the firing showed a lack of love for a fellow brother in the gospel. I saw no love in that action. And the LDS church does teach to love your neighbor. So, my own personal opinion is that church members need to held accountable as to how they treat another human being, even if that treatment happens in the workplace.
I would have the same opinion about church members bullying their subordinates etc.
I intend to lay a foundation that will revolutionize the whole world. Joseph Smith We are “to feed the hungry, to clothe the naked, to provide for the widow, to dry up the tear of the orphan, to comfort the afflicted, whether in this church, or in any other, or in no church at all…” Joseph Smith
I intend to lay a foundation that will revolutionize the whole world. Joseph Smith We are “to feed the hungry, to clothe the naked, to provide for the widow, to dry up the tear of the orphan, to comfort the afflicted, whether in this church, or in any other, or in no church at all…” Joseph Smith
3sheets2thewind wrote: whyme, you do remember that you posted Bradfords action was apstate or apostacy, don't you? whyme, you do remember that you posted Bradford was not Temple worthy, don't you? .
Of course we are selective in our reading understanding. Here was my position: I find sending an email firing someone to be offensive and when it is done inside a church institution it is even more offensive. I also said, that I consider such an action worse than a sexual fling. That being the case, I would consider it to be a problem with temple worthiness because the firing showed a lack of love for a fellow brother in the gospel. I saw no love in that action. And the LDS church does teach to love your neighbor. So, my own personal opinion is that church members need to held accountable as to how they treat another human being, even if that treatment happens in the workplace.
I would have the same opinion about church members bullying their subordinates etc.
Your position is extremely judgmental and is based on only one side, a side(DCP) you have been known to defend all the time. Try and be a little more open minded, instead of being a DCP acolyte.
3sheets2thewind wrote: whyme, you do remember that you posted Bradfords action was apstate or apostacy, don't you? whyme, you do remember that you posted Bradford was not Temple worthy, don't you? .
Of course we are selective in our reading understanding. Here was my position: I find sending an email firing someone to be offensive and when it is done inside a church institution it is even more offensive. I also said, that I consider such an action worse than a sexual fling. That being the case, I would consider it to be a problem with temple worthiness because the firing showed a lack of love for a fellow brother in the gospel. I saw no love in that action. And the LDS church does teach to love your neighbor. So, my own personal opinion is that church members need to held accountable as to how they treat another human being, even if that treatment happens in the workplace.
I would have the same opinion about church members bullying their subordinates etc.
3sheets2thewind wrote: whyme, you do remember that you posted Bradfords action was apstate or apostacy, don't you? whyme, you do remember that you posted Bradford was not Temple worthy, don't you? .
Of course we are selective in our reading understanding. Here was my position: I find sending an email firing someone to be offensive and when it is done inside a church institution it is even more offensive. I also said, that I consider such an action worse than a sexual fling. That being the case, I would consider it to be a problem with temple worthiness because the firing showed a lack of love for a fellow brother in the gospel. I saw no love in that action. And the LDS church does teach to love your neighbor. So, my own personal opinion is that church members need to held accountable as to how they treat another human being, even if that treatment happens in the workplace.
I would have the same opinion about church members bullying their subordinates etc.
3sheets2thewind wrote:So your Doctrinal position is he is a murderer
Lol. I see what you did there.
"The Church is authoritarian, tribal, provincial, and founded on a loosely biblical racist frontier sex cult."--Juggler Vain "The LDS church is the Amway of religions. Even with all the soap they sell, they still manage to come away smelling dirty."--Some Schmo