3sheets2thewind wrote: You said this was worse than a sexual fling...
Anyways, I find the few posts you made on the matter very unfortunate. I suppose thankfully for you the temple worthiness post was deleted by the mods.
Well, that is my take on it. I do consider a church member firing someone by email when they are away from the country worse than a sexual fling. In a sexual fling with two consenting adults, no one gets hurt except the person's own soul. But in this case, the hurt was done toward someone else, a brother in the gospel by another brother.
And dan was hurt by it. Now I also don't like people getting fired by email in the corporate world either. I think that it lacks empathy.
I think that what goes around comes around...
“We look to not only the spiritual but also the temporal, and we believe that a person who is impoverished temporally cannot blossom spiritually.” Keith McMullin - Counsellor in Presiding Bishopric
"One, two, three...let's go shopping!" Thomas S Monson - Prophet, Seer, Revelator
Themis wrote: Your position is extremely judgmental and is based on only one side, a side(DCP) you have been known to defend all the time. Try and be a little more open minded, instead of being a DCP acolyte.
I would think that people would be happy that I was taking a faithful member to task for what he did: send an email firing someone.
You don't know all that may be going on, so you shouldn't be attacking another person who you don't even have his side of the story.
It shows that I can take faithful members to task if I think that they mistreated someone. Now isn't that a positive for this board?
Oh, I forgot, this also has to do with DCP, my mistake.
Your motives are evident. You haven't reserved judgement until you can possibility get the other side. You charge out there attacking him anyways. That is not a positive trait. Try to be a little less hypocritical.
Themis wrote: Your position is extremely judgmental and is based on only one side, a side(DCP) you have been known to defend all the time. Try and be a little more open minded, instead of being a DCP acolyte.
I would think that people would be happy that I was taking a faithful member to task for what he did: send an email firing someone. It shows that I can take faithful members to task if I think that they mistreated someone. Now isn't that a positive for this board?
Oh, I forgot, this also has to do with DCP, my mistake.
It would matter if:
1. Anyone actually cared what you had to say.
2. Who am I kidding, number 1 is enough.
By the way, how are those imaginary priests and nuns treating you these days?
cwald wrote: This is all my fault...I do apologize.
I am very happy that you have found a nice home on this board. As you can see the people here are very happy and respectful of other posters that they do not agree with, especially those who defend the church. I am sure that you will find the board to your liking.
It was "your" people that drove me here. Lest we forget.
"Jesus gave us the gospel, but Satan invented church. It takes serious evil to formalize faith into something tedious and then pile guilt on anyone who doesn’t participate enthusiastically." - Robert Kirby
Beer makes you feel the way you ought to feel without beer. -- Henry Lawson
cwald wrote:It was "your" people that drove me here. Lest we forget.
I'll say it again: we may be more irreverent and use more profanity over here, but the visceral hatred on MDD outweighs anything we do or say here.
"It doesn't seem fair, does it Norm--that I should have so much knowledge when there are people in the world that have to go to bed stupid every night." -- Clifford C. Clavin, USPS
"¡No contaban con mi astucia!" -- El Chapulin Colorado
Why Me, while I rarely agree with you, I think an entire thread started just to bring you down is unkind and unnecessary. 3sheets, I'm not sure why you couldn't have responded to his post in the original thread.
Cylon wrote:Why Me, while I rarely agree with you, I think an entire thread started just to bring you down is unkind and unnecessary. 3sheets, I'm not sure why you couldn't have responded to his post in the original thread.
You're right. Personal threads are not good, unless of course they are started to celebrate me or something I did.
"It doesn't seem fair, does it Norm--that I should have so much knowledge when there are people in the world that have to go to bed stupid every night." -- Clifford C. Clavin, USPS
"¡No contaban con mi astucia!" -- El Chapulin Colorado
cwald wrote: It was "your" people that drove me here. Lest we forget.
Nonsense. You drove yourself here. You were in the driver's seat. Don't lay your driving abilities onto someone else.
I intend to lay a foundation that will revolutionize the whole world. Joseph Smith We are “to feed the hungry, to clothe the naked, to provide for the widow, to dry up the tear of the orphan, to comfort the afflicted, whether in this church, or in any other, or in no church at all…” Joseph Smith
Cylon wrote:Why Me, while I rarely agree with you, I think an entire thread started just to bring you down is unkind and unnecessary. 3sheets, I'm not sure why you couldn't have responded to his post in the original thread.
However, I have not been brought down. Threads like this come with the turf. Look how many threads Dan has had. Or Bcspace. Or selek. All defenders. It just comes with the company.
I intend to lay a foundation that will revolutionize the whole world. Joseph Smith We are “to feed the hungry, to clothe the naked, to provide for the widow, to dry up the tear of the orphan, to comfort the afflicted, whether in this church, or in any other, or in no church at all…” Joseph Smith
Cylon wrote:Why Me, while I rarely agree with you, I think an entire thread started just to bring you down is unkind and unnecessary. 3sheets, I'm not sure why you couldn't have responded to his post in the original thread.
However, I have not been brought down. Threads like this come with the turf. Look how many threads Dan has had. Or Bcspace. Or selek. All defenders. It just comes with the company.