Are men really the weaker sex?

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_just me
_Emeritus
Posts: 9070
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 9:46 pm

Re: Are men really the weaker sex?

Post by _just me »

bcspace wrote:
The fact is nobody would ever have sex and children if it weren't for sexual attraction and FEELINGS in the pants.


Indeed. I see no problem if used in the proper venue.


What does that even mean? How does one confine sexual attraction to a "proper venue" and what would that "proper venue" be?
~Those who benefit from the status quo always attribute inequities to the choices of the underdog.~Ann Crittenden
~The Goddess is not separate from the world-She is the world and all things in it.~
_gramps
_Emeritus
Posts: 2485
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:43 pm

Re: Are men really the weaker sex?

Post by _gramps »

"Just talking about modesty makes me think about immodesty, and that is why I have both my hands in my pockets in order to hide my bulging erection."
I detest my loose style and my libertine sentiments. I thank God, who has removed from my eyes the veil...
Adrian Beverland
_bcspace
_Emeritus
Posts: 18534
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2006 6:48 pm

Re: Are men really the weaker sex?

Post by _bcspace »

Indeed. I see no problem if used in the proper venue.

What does that even mean? How does one confine sexual attraction to a "proper venue" and what would that "proper venue" be?


You implied that sexual attraction was good for sex ("It's thanks to those "impure" thoughts that any of us was ever born!"). I agreed. Do I really need to describe proper venue in the LDS context?
Machina Sublime
Satan's Plan Deconstructed.
Your Best Resource On Joseph Smith's Polygamy.
Conservatism is the Gospel of Christ and the Plan of Salvation in Action.
The Degeneracy Of Progressivism.
_LDSToronto
_Emeritus
Posts: 2515
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 2:11 am

Re: Are men really the weaker sex?

Post by _LDSToronto »

just me wrote:
bcspace wrote:
Indeed. I see no problem if used in the proper venue.


What does that even mean? How does one confine sexual attraction to a "proper venue" and what would that "proper venue" be?


It means no sex on a table in Starbucks.

H.
"Others cannot endure their own littleness unless they can translate it into meaningfulness on the largest possible level."
~ Ernest Becker
"Whether you think of it as heavenly or as earthly, if you love life immortality is no consolation for death."
~ Simone de Beauvoir
_Morley
_Emeritus
Posts: 3542
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 6:19 pm

Re: Are men really the weaker sex?

Post by _Morley »

bcspace wrote:Indeed. I see no problem if used in the proper venue.

just me wrote:What does that even mean? How does one confine sexual attraction to a "proper venue" and what would that "proper venue" be?

LDSToronto wrote:It means no sex on a table in Starbucks.
H.


Damn. There goes my sex life.
_Yoda

Re: Are men really the weaker sex?

Post by _Yoda »

Morley wrote:
bcspace wrote:Indeed. I see no problem if used in the proper venue.

just me wrote:What does that even mean? How does one confine sexual attraction to a "proper venue" and what would that "proper venue" be?

LDSToronto wrote:It means no sex on a table in Starbucks.
H.


Damn. There goes my sex life.

ROTFLMAO! :lol:
_sock puppet
_Emeritus
Posts: 17063
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 2:52 pm

Re: Are men really the weaker sex?

Post by _sock puppet »

just me wrote:
bcspace wrote:
Indeed. I see no problem if used in the proper venue.


What does that even mean? How does one confine sexual attraction to a "proper venue" and what would that "proper venue" be?
LDSToronto wrote:
It means no sex on a table in Starbucks.

H.

Oh, but that is the proper LDS venue for the sex drive--no other Mormons should be at the Starbucks to observe the sex in progress.
_Hasa Diga Eebowai
_Emeritus
Posts: 2390
Joined: Tue May 24, 2011 8:57 am

Re: Are men really the weaker sex?

Post by _Hasa Diga Eebowai »

-
Last edited by Guest on Mon Jul 14, 2014 3:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
_Yoda

Re: Are men really the weaker sex?

Post by _Yoda »

just me wrote:
bcspace wrote:
Indeed. I see no problem if used in the proper venue.


What does that even mean? How does one confine sexual attraction to a "proper venue" and what would that "proper venue" be?
LDSToronto wrote:
It means no sex on a table in Starbucks.

H.

Sock Puppet wrote:Oh, but that is the proper LDS venue for the sex drive--no other Mormons should be at the Starbucks to observe the sex in progress.

Why use a table? In Starbucks, there are plenty of cozy sofas. :twisted:
_DarkHelmet
_Emeritus
Posts: 5422
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 11:38 pm

Re: Are men really the weaker sex?

Post by _DarkHelmet »

This may come as a huge shock to TBM men, but women are also capable of being sexually aroused by walking male porn.

Image
"We have taken up arms in defense of our liberty, our property, our wives, and our children; we are determined to preserve them, or die."
- Captain Moroni - 'Address to the Inhabitants of Canada' 1775
Post Reply