Schryver on Bushman's RSR

[_MCB]

you wonder if it's good enough to publish without embarrassing Kofford Books.

What is wrong about publishing something by an egotistical prominent idiot, in order to illustrate their idiocy? Like clips of Donald Trump ridiculing Obama's birth certificate.

[_Bob Loblaw]

What is wrong about publishing something by an egotistical prominent idiot, in order to illustrate their idiocy? Like clips of Donald Trump ridiculing Obama's birth certificate.

If a book company is trying to build a reputation for publishing solid, well-researched publications, they may not want to publish something by a prominent idiot, egotistical or not, regardless of the motivation.

[_the narrator]

To be fair, I have not read Schryver's manuscript and know little of it. If it makes a significant contribution to the discussion I would consider it for publication.

[_Bob Loblaw]

To be fair, I have not read Schryver's manuscript and no little of it. If it makes a significant contribution to the discussion I would consider it for publication.

No one said you wouldn't. I've been pleasantly surprised before, and maybe Schryver will surprise me this time. From what we've seen of Schryver's theory so far, I'm not holding out much hope for his book, if there ever is one.

[_Darth J]

http://www.mormondialogue.org/topic/58284-vogel-responds-to-starr/page__st__40

I hope that the recent shake-up at the NAMI will serve as a wake-up call to those who have been "biting their tongues" in the years since Rough Stone Rolling was published, and that it will finally receive the muscular critique it deserves

http://www.mormondialogue.org/topic/582 ... 1209139981

In my judgment, the "tone" of Mormon apologetics has always been quite agreeable. It has always come across to me as: confident, masculine, meticulous, honest, authoritative, and assured.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AO43p2Wqc08

[_Bob Loblaw]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AO43p2Wqc08

Quite fitting, as there's more than a little homoeroticism in those quotes, as well as obvious misogyny.

[_Molok]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AO43p2Wqc08

I was thinking something more like this

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rWrlAmT4jyA

[_Darth J]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AO43p2Wqc08

I was thinking something more like this

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rWrlAmT4jyA

The parallels between Macho Man's anger at the president of the WWF and the anger of the Danites at Gerald Butler are truly uncanny.

[_Ludd]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rWrlAmT4jyA

The parallels between Macho Man's anger at the president of the WWF and the anger of the Danites at Gerald Butler are truly uncanny.

Are the Danites angry at Gerald Butler?






Who is Gerald Butler? Is he related to Gerard Bradford by any chance?

[_Bob Loblaw]

The comments section of this bit on Time shows Peterson in full meltdown mode:

http://lightbox.time.com/2011/12/05/hap ... pbringing/