Blixa wrote:Droopy wrote:
Everyone, from Wade to myself and Will, admitted there had been some over the top ad hominem language in a tiny, disparate part of Will's long posting history.
And that's everyone qua everyone.
Well, uh...
Hardly.
Blixa wrote:Droopy wrote:
Everyone, from Wade to myself and Will, admitted there had been some over the top ad hominem language in a tiny, disparate part of Will's long posting history.
And that's everyone qua everyone.
Blixa wrote:Droopy wrote:
Everyone, from Wade to myself and Will, admitted there had been some over the top ad hominem language in a tiny, disparate part of Will's long posting history.
And that's everyone qua everyone.
So "things as you see them" leaves a bit to be desired. But in any case, Jesus---you know, the guy who said not to say "raca" to people---doesn't like it if you say the "s" word, but doesn't mind if you call people retards. Is that the principle of the Restored Gospel we take away from your statement?
Droopy wrote:No, its not. Its rude and uncivil (this board seems to bring that out in even the best of us), but hardly misogynous....
Ha!
Droopy wrote:These boots are made for walkin'...
So, when you call the guy working the fastfood window at MickeyDee's a "lazy n-word" for taking too long with your Big Mac, that's just you being rude and uncivil, because you're not a racist.
Am I following?
Droopy wrote:Care to detox first and then try that again?
Kishkumen wrote:Droopy wrote:Care to detox first and then try that again?
Care to answer the question?
Droopy wrote:I'd love to, but I have no idea what on earth your talking about.