La Trahison Des Clercs in the Fulness of Times

[_Droopy]

I'd love to, but I have no idea what on earth your talking about.

In other words, you can't truly claim that Will is not a misogynist with a straight face, because you know you are wrong or simply lying.

Using the "N" word at the drive-through window cannot be used to adjudge whether one is using it to mean blacks as a class, or a particular kind of black person with specific kinds of attitudes and mannerisms, i.e. the way it is used by many blacks (such as one good friend of mine) within black culture, at least here in the South.

In other words, your argument here is equally applicable to your own and Jeffrie's claims. This is the problem with leftist's little black back of ists and isms; they're labels used to silence and censor, not specific descriptive terms used judiciously to clarify concepts.

[_Kishkumen]

Using the "N" word at the drive-through window cannot be used to adjudge whether one is using it to mean blacks as a class, or a particular kind of black person with specific kinds of attitudes and mannerisms, i.e. the way it is used by many blacks (such as one good friend of mine) within black culture, at least here in the South.

In other words, your argument here is equally applicable to your own and Jeffrie's claims. This is the problem with leftist's little black back of ists and isms; they're labels used to silence and censor, not specific descriptive terms used judiciously to clarify concepts.

Wow.

Er... thanks (I guess?) for the "clarification" of your position.

[_Droopy]

Using the "N" word at the drive-through window cannot be used to adjudge whether one is using it to mean blacks as a class, or a particular kind of black person with specific kinds of attitudes and mannerisms, i.e. the way it is used by many blacks (such as one good friend of mine) within black culture, at least here in the South.

In other words, your argument here is equally applicable to your own and Jeffrie's claims. This is the problem with leftist's little black back of ists and isms; they're labels used to silence and censor, not specific descriptive terms used judiciously to clarify concepts.

Wow.

Er... thanks (I guess?) for the "clarification" of your position.

Yes, as a liberal I knew this would be well outside your range.

[_Kishkumen]

Yes, as a liberal I knew this would be well outside your range.

Oh, I doubt being liberal has anything to do with it. It is more like being a human being with a sense of decency that causes consternation at your attitudes.

[_Droopy]

Yes, as a liberal I knew this would be well outside your range.

Oh, I doubt being liberal has anything to do with it. It is more like being a human being with a sense of decency that causes consternation at your attitudes.

Does this look human to you?

[_Darth J]

So "things as you see them" leaves a bit to be desired. But in any case, Jesus---you know, the guy who said not to say "raca" to people---doesn't like it if you say the "s" word, but doesn't mind if you call people retards. Is that the principle of the Restored Gospel we take away from your statement?

This is one of the classic tactics of the demagogue: make people angry by viciously attacking them on a relentless basis, and when they shoot back, attack them again for not being mild little lambs ambling, head bowed, to the slaughter.

Why don't you just admit that you can get away with saying anything you please, but I'm not supposed to say anything back with any sternness or negative personal observation, of any kind, no matter what names I'm called or what smears and cut downs come my way.

You're overwhelming concern for the welfare of my soul and the rigor with which I live gospel teachings is deeply touching, Darth.

Darth...yeah, very symbolic screen name, that.

Uh, no, Sifu Droopy.

You have claimed to be in a superior moral position to all of us apostates. You claim to be compelled by the oath and covenant of the priesthood to rebuke everyone who does not share your Jihad Lite version of Mormonism. So the double standard is one that you have imposed upon yourself by purporting to represent an allegedly superior position of righteousness.

However, per your statement above, I find it refreshing that you have now abandoned even the pretense of being a Christian qua Christian.

[_Droopy]

Uh, no, Sifu Droopy.

That's "master" to you, peanut.

You have claimed to be in a superior moral position to all of us apostates. You claim to be compelled by the oath and covenant of the priesthood to rebuke everyone who does not share your Jihad Lite version of Mormonism. So the double standard is one that you have imposed upon yourself by purporting to represent an allegedly superior position of righteousness.

However, per your statement above, I find it refreshing that you have now abandoned even the pretense of being a Christian qua Christian.

I'm going back to ignoring you completely. Discourse with you is utterly pointless.

[_Blixa]

Whatever is Droopy doing to that poor human girl in that photo he posted?

[_Droopy]

Whatever is Droopy doing to that poor human girl in that photo he posted?

This is a classic specimin of Liberalis stupidicus believus anythingus, otherwise known as a "leftist" or, by the misnomer "liberal." There are many varieties, but this is the most common form.

As to what its doing to the girl, you'll have to read up on your Kinsey or Judith Butler.

[Guest]

Uh, no, Sifu Droopy.

That's "master" to you, peanut.

Those were the days, weren't they? The Bee Gees were at the top of the charts.....Chevy Chase was making fun of President Ford on the brand new show, "Saturday Night Live"..........polyester was king.......Droopy was going to kung fu classes for a while..........

You have claimed to be in a superior moral position to all of us apostates. You claim to be compelled by the oath and covenant of the priesthood to rebuke everyone who does not share your Jihad Lite version of Mormonism. So the double standard is one that you have imposed upon yourself by purporting to represent an allegedly superior position of righteousness.

However, per your statement above, I find it refreshing that you have now abandoned even the pretense of being a Christian qua Christian.

I'm going back to ignoring you completely. Discourse with you is utterly pointless.

And it came to pass that I said unto them that I knew that I had spoken hard things against the wicked, according to the truth; and the righteous have I justified, and testified that they should be lifted up at the last day; wherefore, the guilty taketh the truth to be hard, for it cutteth them to the very center.