No more about the “Other” Board Aug 12 by Hamblin of Jerusalem
I’m done talking about the Board-That-Cannot-Be-Named. I have no interesting in visiting the site, or reading what they have to say, or talking about them. I only mentioned them at all because a friend sent me an email describing their attacks on John Gee, and I felt like defending my friend John. So I won’t say any more about them, nor will I post anything members of that board send as comments. Case closed.
Look how Hamblin-boy can't even properly use the word "interesting". What a goddamn idiot.
No more about the “Other” Board Aug 12 by Hamblin of Jerusalem
I’m done talking about the Board-That-Cannot-Be-Named. I have no interesting in visiting the site, or reading what they have to say, or talking about them. I only mentioned them at all because a friend sent me an email describing their attacks on John Gee, and I felt like defending my friend John. So I won’t say any more about them, nor will I post anything members of that board send as comments. Case closed.
Look how Hamblin-boy can't even properly use the word "interesting". What a goddamn idiot.
Paul O
Remember a few weeks ago when I cast doubt on the origin of the email that was purportedly from Dr Bradford, because the writer used the wrong one of the "effect"/"affect" pair, and you said that it was a common mistake that anyone could make?
Don't you feel like you should extend the same courtesy to Dr Hamblin? Totally your choice, of course (;=)
NOMinal member
Maksutov: "... if you give someone else the means to always push your buttons, you're lost."
malkie wrote:Remember a few weeks ago when I cast doubt on the origin of the email that was purportedly from Dr Bradford, because the writer used the wrong one of the "effect"/"affect" pair, and you said that it was a common mistake that anyone could make?
Don't you feel like you should extend the same courtesy to Dr Hamblin? Totally your choice, of course (;=)
Well, Hamblin-boy isn't much of a writer and considering that his diploma was handed to him on a silver platter I guess I could cut him some slack.
Oh for shame, how the mortals put the blame on us gods, for they say evils come from us, but it is they, rather, who by their own recklessness win sorrow beyond what is given... Zeus (1178 BC)
He is a school teacher hiking in the hills of Jerusalem -- pretending to be an important person for the Lord. He gets revelation all the time. He's practically a prophet.
This board and that board represent two sides of the same coin. The two were always meant to be together and this artificial war and separation is the cause of much evil in the world. Let this be your last battlefield:
Bill Hamblin wrote: So I won’t say any more about them
EAllusion wrote:But really, it functions how making fun of the French does on, say, right wing radio. For some people it's a joke. For others in the audience it is not. But for even those that it is, it works on their attitudes inch by inch and before you know it, the vitriol is more real than it is sarcasm.
No need to bring those cheese-eating surrender monkeys into it.
"It seems to me that these women were the head (κεφάλαιον) of the church which was at Philippi." ~ John Chrysostom, Homilies on Philippians 13
bcspace wrote:This board and that board represent two sides of the same coin. The two were always meant to be together and this artificial war and separation is the cause of much evil in the world.
It is quite weird how much this board talks about the other board and vice versa. It's like a family where when someone has a problem with another family member, they don't go talk to the family member directly but instead only go talk about it behind their back with other sympathetic family members.
Maybe if Juliann and Shades could somehow bury the hatchet over that whole transcript fiasco . . . yeah I don't see that happening.
