Blogger interviews dude who posted temple ceremony..Romney

[_Eric]

That's the spirit!

Now go apply that same editorial eye to that 21-page catastrophe you tried to sell us on.

I suggest you get your own crap in order before crapping on others. Not only was your sentence superfluous and hyperbolic, but it would make third-grade students cringe because the stupid burns.

I lol'd.

[_ldsdreams]

That's the spirit!

Now go apply that same editorial eye to that 21-page catastrophe you tried to sell us on.

Right, the one that you didn't read in its entirety because it was too long for Princess to read. And no one sold anything. The article was on a site that required no membership fee, and which carried no ads. Get your facts straight.

[_Eric]

Right, the one that you didn't read in its entirety because it was too long for Princess to read.

For the record, pedo-bear, I read the 21 page nightmare -- it was your "doomed for life" "article" that I kindly passed on with a generous TL;DR.

After the 21 pages of word vomit, I knew I couldn't do it again.

Just wanted to clear that up.

[_ldsdreams]

Right, the one that you didn't read in its entirety because it was too long for Princess to read.

For the record, pedo-bear, I read the 21 page nightmare -- it was your "doomed for life" "article" that I kindly passed on with a generous TL;DR.

After the 21 pages of word vomit, I knew I couldn't do it again.

Just wanted to clear that up.

Sure, whatever you say, cupcake.

[_Eric]

Sure, whatever you say, cupcake.

See, that wasn't so hard. Was it?

Keep it simple, stupid.

[_ldsdreams]

Sure, whatever you say, cupcake.

See, that wasn't so hard. Was it?

Keep it simple, stupid.

Yes, simple for the stupid, like you. :)

[Guest]

.

[_Emily]

I read the whole thing. Most of your articles are a mechanism for you to vent your anger and/or to anger others. They are often loosely disguised as being topical. This article was no different and as some here have mentioned, you don't have to read much of it to realize that.

I don't think anyone is confused about why you posted in this forum either. If you are going to promote your site, you should at least have the guts to admit it's yours, though. Playing the "straw man" doesn't fool anyone for very long, so what's the point? You destroy any credibility you might have garnered by being honest from the beginning.

Finally, your assertion that "(t)he article was very well received by people with a brain" is obviously a lie as no one with a brain would appreciate something so poorly written.

[_Eric]

And no one sold anything. The article was on a site that required no membership fee, and which carried no ads. Get your facts straight.

My god, you can't really be this dense...

Then again, this is a professional troll we're dealing with...

[_ldsdreams]

And no one sold anything. The article was on a site that required no membership fee, and which carried no ads. Get your facts straight.

My god, you can't really be this dense...

Then again, this is a professional troll we're dealing with...

This from a guy who bags on others' writing when he can't form a coherent sentence that a first-grader could. A FIRST-GRADER! You seriously need to talk to your bishop about that hatred. In your heart.