mercyngrace wrote: I noticed this morning that Zerinus was suspended for a somewhat sarcastic response to Bill Hamblin. I felt bad for him. He and I have disagreed on many things over the last few years and for a while, he harassed me (all in good fun, I think) at every opportunity, but I didn't think his comment was "insulting" enough to warrant suspension. I thought he was making a point, as opposed to a nasty personal attacks which often pass for points on message boards, and I took his comments with that in mind.
One of my favorite memories of the Mormon Dungeons & Dragons Board was when Zerinus started calling Daniel Peterson an anti-Mormon and they got in a knock-down drag-out over it.
That thread wasn't deleted, was it?
All the Best!
-Consiglieri
You prove yourself of the devil and anti-mormon every word you utter, because only the devil perverts facts to make their case.--ldsfaqs (6-24-13)
Schryver is the worst kind of Christian out there. He's absolutely vile and will never turn his other cheek in humililty because he is an angry evil man. The Christian ilk of Schryverism feeds on slandering others.
Go light up another joint, Will-boy -- take a deep hit and hold it in you goddamn dope. You're nothing but a druggie and a Mormon fake. You should be nailed to the nearest cross.
Better yet, go jump in a baptism font and drown yourself. The world will be much better off without Schryver in it. He's pure evil.
William Schryver: ... the MDB mob was only able to dig up this mere handful of allegedly offensive things I have ever written. Less than .1% of my total posting history! All things considered, I think that's a pretty damn good record. Would that we all bridled our tongues so well ...
Is this fractured history or what? Will's usage of naughty words and insults drew constant comment here. Schryver, Polygamy Porter and Some Schmo constituted the big three of profanity.
How easily are these MDD boarders sold a bill of goods?
consiglieri wrote:One of my favorite memories of the Mormon Dungeons & Dragons Board was when Zerinus started calling Daniel Peterson an anti-Mormon and they got in a knock-down drag-out over it.
That thread wasn't deleted, was it?
All the Best!
-Consiglieri
I doubt it. A majority of the threads got dumped when the board transitioned. I saved a lot of threads that interested me and a few by special request but the vast majority of the threads are gone.
"In my more rebellious days I tried to doubt the existence of the sacred, but the universe kept dancing and life kept writing poetry across my life." ~ David N. Elkins, 1998, Beyond Religion, p. 81
As for using the dreaded "b" word in reference to harmony and beastie ... well, I'm sorry to disappoint those anxious to condemn me, but I don't feel bad about it. They are, as I said at the time, two extraordinarily deceitful women.
LOL. Of course Willie asserts this without a shred of evidence regarding my "deceit".
Here's how it works in Willie World. Abundant evidence is provided that Willie posted in a fairly disgusting manner towards women on this site. Willie declares that he did no such thing, despite the evidence.
Zero evidence is provided that I was deceitful. Willie declares he was perfectly justified in calling me a deceitful B nonetheless.
I'm glad I don't understand how Willie's mind works. If I could, I should be frightened for myself.
We hate to seem like we don’t trust every nut with a story, but there’s evidence we can point to, and dance while shouting taunting phrases.
'Cause little Willy, Willy won't go home But you can't push Willy round Willy won't go, try tellin' everybody but, oh no Little Willy, Willy won't go home
“We look to not only the spiritual but also the temporal, and we believe that a person who is impoverished temporally cannot blossom spiritually.” Keith McMullin - Counsellor in Presiding Bishopric
"One, two, three...let's go shopping!" Thomas S Monson - Prophet, Seer, Revelator
Oh, and by the way Willie, I still understand Mormonism better than you do. I understand, for example, that true repentance requires accepting responsibility for one's own behavior instead of saying, basically, "He made me do it!"
We hate to seem like we don’t trust every nut with a story, but there’s evidence we can point to, and dance while shouting taunting phrases.
beastie wrote: LOL. Of course Willie asserts this without a shred of evidence regarding my "deceit".
Here's how it works in Willie World. Abundant evidence is provided that Willie posted in a fairly disgusting manner towards women on this site. Willie declares that he did no such thing, despite the evidence.
Zero evidence is provided that I was deceitful. Willie declares he was perfectly justified in calling me a deceitful B nonetheless.
I'm glad I don't understand how Willie's mind works. If I could, I should be frightened for myself.
"If a provable accusation makes up less than an undefined percentage of ones total experience in a given sphere, then the accusation is flatly false on its face and the accuser is a bitch propagandist." ~ Willagorean Theorem; William Schryver circa 2012
beastie wrote:LOL. Of course Willie asserts this without a shred of evidence regarding my "deceit".
Here's how it works in Willie World. Abundant evidence is provided that Willie posted in a fairly disgusting manner towards women on this site. Willie declares that he did no such thing, despite the evidence.
Zero evidence is provided that I was deceitful. Willie declares he was perfectly justified in calling me a deceitful B nonetheless.
I realize it's easy for me to say, but I recommend not giving this accusation much thought. I'm almost 100% confident that none of the denizens of MD&D believe him, either.
3sheets2thewind wrote:"If a provable accusation makes up less than an undefined percentage of ones total experience in a given sphere, then the accusation is flatly false on its face and the accuser is a bitch propagandist." ~ Willagorean Theorem; William Schryver circa 2012
3sheets2thewind, that was brilliant!
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"
Dr. Shades wrote:I'm almost 100% confident that none of the denizens of MD&D believe him, either.
I wonder if even Will might be afraid this is true. I notice he made his post then immediately locked the thread before anyone else had the opportunity to post. Pussy.