Schryver Apologizes (Again) for Calling Emma a "B"

[_beastie]

I realize it's easy for me to say, but I recommend not giving this accusation much thought. I'm almost 100% confident that none of the denizens of MD&D believe him, either.

It doesn't bother me a whit.

"If a provable accusation makes up less than an undefined percentage of ones total experience in a given sphere, then the accusation is flatly false on its face and the accuser is a bitch propagandist." ~ Willagorean Theorem; William Schryver circa 2012

3sheets2thewind, that was brilliant!

Second that!

[_lulu]

I did not call Emma a bitch.

I apoligize for calling Emma a bitch.

I promise never to call Emma a bitch again.

Any questions?

[_DrW]

I don't really know much about the guy and I really haven't had the patience to follow all the drama but I just feel sorry for him...what a sad, insecure old man (the pony tail is not helping). I wonder who he is still trying to convince that he is not an egotistical a##hole who regularly posts to offend? Is he actually suggesting that being a d$%kbag is ok as long as its not that often? I also find his need to call other active (more christ-like) LDS members on their "allegiance" somewhat pathetic. Although it makes the ex-mo in me smile a little considering people like him completely embarrass my LDS wife and friends.

Its sad that he treats religion like a team sport.

That said, I have never posted over at that site - can authors lock their own threads? Or is he a moderator?

I love it.

A new standard of Mopologetic conduct: it is okay to behave very badly so long as it is not done more than 0.1% of the time.

This would mean that after another 1000 posts, or so, it will be okay for Will to use the "b" and "c" words again to describe females he doesn't like.

How many posts will he have to write, in total, before he can get around to insulting all such females?

Can this guy be any more ridiculous than he already is?

[_sock puppet]

'Cause little Willy, Willy won't go home
But you can't push Willy round
Willy won't go, try tellin' everybody but, oh no
Little Willy, Willy won't go home

Really, Drifting? I thought you were younger.

[_Blixa]

I did not call Emma a bitch.

I apoligize for calling Emma a bitch.

I promise never to call Emma a bitch again.

Any questions?

I know. That was the least sincere apology I've ever read.

I truly hope Brigham Young was right when he opined, "No man or woman in this dispensation will ever enter into the celestial kingdom of God without the consent of Joseph Smith." We'll see how far that apology flies...

[_EAllusion]

That was an exceptionally insincere notpology. He didn't even make it "I'm sorry you were offended" levels of notpology. Good stuff for a person who's main hobby is defending a faith based in contrition and forgiveness.

[Guest]

-

[_Cinnamon Bear Head]

According to homeopathy, that tiny percentage, properly remaining in a highly distilled medium, magnifies the offense.

[_3sheets2thewind]

I did not call Emma a bitch.

I apoligize for calling Emma a bitch.

I promise never to call Emma a bitch again.

Any questions?

I know. That was the least sincere apology I've ever read.

I truly hope Brigham Young was right when he opined, "No man or woman in this dispensation will ever enter into the celestial kingdom of God without the consent of Joseph Smith." We'll see how far that apology flies...

But William's Calling and Election has been made sure. So he can do and say whatever he wants....No backsies you know.

[_MsJack]

Sorry, health reasons and the upcoming start of the new semester are keeping me from this forum.

What lulu, Blixa and EAllusion said. Nevertheless, I will note the non-apology on my thread. I guess we're still waiting for an apology to the MDB mods for wrongfully accusing them of tampering with his post.

I will again re-iterate the evidence for the "c***" incident, and the fact that, at one point, William himself admitted to authoring the "WilliamSchryver" post.

And yes, repeatedly addressing women's arguments by sexualizing them and invoking their appearance, breasts, bodies, ages, sex life, or attractiveness to you does count as misogynist. Quite blatantly so.