Mormon Apologetics & Misogyny: The Case of William Schryver

[_RayAgostini]

Let's see just how principled Ms. Jack really is.

Darth J:

Your daughters are crack whores, Ray.

[_Chap]

This is what's known as mansplainin', Ray, and it officially makes me think less of you. Who do you think you are to tell me what is and is not "necessary" when a man is aggressively sexualizing the women he engages? Especially when you never lifted a finger in protest? On top of this, I recall you flipping a gasket and becoming quite upset when a member of this forum called your daughters "crack whores."

It sounds like a nice story, but the problem is that no one on "this forum" ever called my daughters "crack whores". So you must have false memory syndrome, or something.

You know, I was just thinking the other day that lately on the board there are not nearly enough lunatic, substance-free rants that misrepresent what people say. How fortunate that Ray has shown up to remedy that situation.



Your daughters are crack whores, Ray.

Let's see just how principled Ms. Jack really is.

Darth J:

Your daughters are crack whores, Ray.

He's kind of teasing you, Ray. Are you really upset by this?

[_Kishkumen]

Your daughters are crack whores, Ray.

He's kind of teasing you, Ray. Are you really upset by this?

Since it was Darth J, his board arch-nemesis, who did this, you'd better believe he is upset.

[_Chap]

Your daughters are crack whores, Ray.

He's kind of teasing you, Ray. Are you really upset by this?

Since it was Darth J, his board arch-nemesis, who did this, you'd better believe he is upset.

OK. So it appears that MsJack got it about right:

This is what's known as mansplainin', Ray, and it officially makes me think less of you. Who do you think you are to tell me what is and is not "necessary" when a man is aggressively sexualizing the women he engages? Especially when you never lifted a finger in protest? On top of this, I recall you flipping a gasket and becoming quite upset when a member of this forum called your daughters "crack whores."

[_Kishkumen]

OK. So it appears that MsJack got it about right:

This is what's known as mansplainin', Ray, and it officially makes me think less of you. Who do you think you are to tell me what is and is not "necessary" when a man is aggressively sexualizing the women he engages? Especially when you never lifted a finger in protest? On top of this, I recall you flipping a gasket and becoming quite upset when a member of this forum called your daughters "crack whores."

The problem, in Ray's view, is that Jack is not devoting a thread to decrying the evils of Darth J to get him punted from the Institute for Advanced Anti-Mormon Criticisms, for which he was preparing a manuscript. You know, since these situations are perfectly parallel in every way.

[_MsJack]

I don't approve of Darth J calling Ray's daughters "crack whores." I recognize that it was a tongue-in-cheek gesture meant to prove a point: that Ray A believes the women in his own life are worth defending and speaking up for, but women like Emma Smith and the female members of this forum aren't. And he proved that point. I still don't think that he should have done it. If it really bothers Ray, he should use his report button and have it removed, since attacking family members of participants is against the rules of the forum.

I won't be doing a "Criticism of Mormon Apologetics & Misogyny: The Case of Darth J" thread because I haven't seen repeated and consistent misogyny from Darth J, plus Darth J isn't planning on publishing in any academic journals anytime soon.

[_Darth J]

I see that Ray has taken umbrage at a vulgar, sexualized comment about his daughters. This must mean that:

1. Ray is assassinating my character; or
2. Ray is simply furthering his agenda; or
3. Ray is terrified that my compelling theories will see the light of day; or
4. Ray hates everyone who shares any common beliefs with me; or
5. All of the above.

Oh, and I've also re-read what I said, and I am confident that no objective, reasonable person would find it offensive to refer to a female as a crack whore.

[_Dr. Shades]

Oh, and I've also re-read what I said, and I am confident that no objective, reasonable person would find it offensive to refer to a female as a crack whore.

Don't worry, I don't think you called anyone a crack whore. I'm pretty sure one of the moderators here edited your post to make it look like you called someone a crack whore.

[_sock puppet]

Oh, and I've also re-read what I said, and I am confident that no objective, reasonable person would find it offensive to refer to a female as a crack whore.

Don't worry, I don't think you called anyone a crack whore. I'm pretty sure one of the moderators here edited your post to make it look like you called someone a crack whore.

Which of the Mod Squad has such a diabolical mind?

[_Stormy Waters]

Oh, and I've also re-read what I said, and I am confident that no objective, reasonable person would find it offensive to refer to a female as a crack whore.

Don't worry, I don't think you called anyone a crack whore. I'm pretty sure one of the moderators here edited your post to make it look like you called someone a crack whore.

Plus it's only like .001% of all his posts, so he has a pretty good track record.