Locked thread..Mod intervention..Pahoran given last word MAD

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_Maxrep
_Emeritus
Posts: 677
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 4:29 am

Re: Locked thread..Mod intervention..Pahoran given last word

Post by _Maxrep »

Pahoran wrote:There's no "little known back door." Contributors on MDDB have limited moderator privileges in threads they start. That has been the case for some time.


If it is not a little known back door, why is nobody here aware of this? Please point out a sticky thread at MADB that informs users who have not racked up 2000 posts, of its potential use. Additionally, what policy states that this is a fair and expected part of forum etiquette at MADB?

What critic has opened a locked thread over there, left a final reply, and then locked up the thread again? If this is common knowledge, than surely it happens with regularity among the critical posters at MADB.

Getting rep points from your cronies does not represent anything other than back patting among club members.
I don't expect to see same-sex marriage in Utah within my lifetime. - Scott Lloyd, Oct 23 2013
_Maxrep
_Emeritus
Posts: 677
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 4:29 am

Re: Locked thread..Mod intervention..Pahoran given last word

Post by _Maxrep »

Link from wiki:


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latter_Day ... th_century

Shortage of wives caused by plural marriage

Richard Abanes argues that polygamy may have caused a shortage of brides in the early LDS community.[19] The New York Times reported in 1860 that church leader Heber C. Kimball stated (in an address to departing missionaries):


Brethren, I want you to understand that it is not to be as it has been heretofore. The brother missionaries have been in the habit of picking out the prettiest women for themselves before they get here, and bringing on the ugly ones for us; hereafter you have to bring them all here before taking any of them, and let us all have a fair shake.[20]

Mormon scholars[who?] dispute the accuracy of the quote[citation needed], as it cannot be corroborated by a second source such as the extensive (though incomplete) record of discourses in the Journal of Discourses. FairWiki suggests that it may be a paraphrase of the following quoted statement, which is authentic. [21]

On another occasion, Kimball said "You are sent out as shepherds to gather the sheep together; and remember that they are not your sheep: they belong to Him that sends you. Then do not make a choice of any of those sheep; do not make selections before they are brought home and put into the fold."[22] Critics of Mormonism interpret this to be a statement of "selecting" converts for plural marriages.[citation needed] However, in the paragraph immediately following the above quote, Kimball went on to say:


The principle of plurality of wives never will be done away. Some sisters have had revelations that when this time passes away and they go through the veil every woman will have a husband to herself. I wish more of our young men would take to themselves wives of the daughters of Zion and not wait for us old men to take them all; go-ahead upon the right principle young gentlemen and God bless you forever and ever and make you fruitful, that we may fill the mountains and then the earth with righteous inhabitants.

This would appear to contradict the critics' interpretation mentioned above.

Mormon apologists[who?] dispute that there was a shortage of women, and advocate that polygamy was used at least in part to care for women who did not have husbands or were widows.[citation needed] LDS historians George L. Mitton and Rhett S. James of FARMS cite Brigham Young[23] as encouraging single men to marry, stating that the incidence of polygamy would thus be reduced.[24]

The precise number who participated in plural marriage is not known, but studies indicate a maximum of 20-25% of LDS adults were members of polygamist households. One third of the women of marriageable age and nearly all of the church leadership were involved in the practice.[25]

Bold mine.


From the madb thread:


"Shall I tell you the law of God in regard to the African race? If the white man who belongs to the chosen seed mixes his blood with the seed of Cain, the penalty, under the law of God, is death on the spot. This will always be so." (Journal of Discourses, vol. 10, p. 110) - Brigham Young

If the above quote from BY came from a source that did not view the church with an eye of favoritism, you would fight it tooth and nail, despite it having actually occurred. The truth is, the high watermark for absolutely callous and unbelievable statements from church leaders is an "11" on a scale of 1 to 10.

The quote you have a problem with;

"The brother missionaries have been in the habit of picking out the prettiest women for themselves before they get here, and bringing on the ugly ones for us"

is clearly present on wikipedia. It is properly referenced. It is maintained on wikipedia, and it will remain in my signature line.

You claim an angel with a flaiming sword threatened to destroy Joseph if he did not take multiple wives. Which is more plausible, Heber having made the the referenced statement, or an angel waving the flaming sword at joseph? With this in mind, what frame of reference are you prepared to use for applications of LDS truth claims that you can also apply to my signature line with equal consistency?

W
I don't expect to see same-sex marriage in Utah within my lifetime. - Scott Lloyd, Oct 23 2013
_Pahoran
_Emeritus
Posts: 1296
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 2:20 am

Re: Locked thread..Mod intervention..Pahoran given last word

Post by _Pahoran »

Maxrep wrote:Link from wiki:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latter_Day ... th_century

Shortage of wives caused by plural marriage

Richard Abanes argues that polygamy may have caused a shortage of brides in the early LDS community.[19] The New York Times reported in 1860 that church leader Heber C. Kimball stated (in an address to departing missionaries):

Brethren, I want you to understand that it is not to be as it has been heretofore. The brother missionaries have been in the habit of picking out the prettiest women for themselves before they get here, and bringing on the ugly ones for us; hereafter you have to bring them all here before taking any of them, and let us all have a fair shake.[20]

Yes, and who heard him say it? When was the talk given? The provenance of this alleged statement is highly questionable at best. It's actually a piece of unsubstantiated gossip. The quote is spurious, which is entirely sufficient to explain why you like it.

Continuing:

Maxrep wrote:FairWiki suggests that it may be a paraphrase of the following quoted statement, which is authentic. [21]

On another occasion, Kimball said "You are sent out as shepherds to gather the sheep together; and remember that they are not your sheep: they belong to Him that sends you. Then do not make a choice of any of those sheep; do not make selections before they are brought home and put into the fold."[22] Critics of Mormonism interpret this to be a statement of "selecting" converts for plural marriages.[citation needed] However, in the paragraph immediately following the above quote, Kimball went on to say:

The principle of plurality of wives never will be done away. Some sisters have had revelations that when this time passes away and they go through the veil every woman will have a husband to herself. I wish more of our young men would take to themselves wives of the daughters of Zion and not wait for us old men to take them all; go-ahead upon the right principle young gentlemen and God bless you forever and ever and make you fruitful, that we may fill the mountains and then the earth with righteous inhabitants.

This would appear to contradict the critics' interpretation mentioned above.

Take a note of that, Maxrep; an authentic statement by Heber C. Kimball encourages the younger men to marry so that "us old men" won't have to. How is that compatible with the bogus quote you prefer?

Maxrep wrote:From the madb thread:

"Shall I tell you the law of God in regard to the African race? If the white man who belongs to the chosen seed mixes his blood with the seed of Cain, the penalty, under the law of God, is death on the spot. This will always be so." (Journal of Discourses, vol. 10, p. 110) - Brigham Young

This is called the "throw as much mud as possible to see what sticks" approach.

Always beloved of spiteful demagogues.

Maxrep wrote:If the above quote from BY came from a source that did not view the church with an eye of favoritism, you would fight it tooth and nail, despite it having actually occurred.

There is no argument to be made from the unfulfilled condition. The fact, despite your transparent attempt at deflection, is that the Kimball quote in your sig is not authentic and you know it. As you know, bringing up Brigham is a failed attempt to deflect attention from your use of a bogus quote. It failed on MDDB, too. Why did you try it again when it fell flat before? Do you think the MDB audience is more easily deceived? If so, you're probably right.

Maxrep wrote:The truth is, the high watermark for absolutely callous and unbelievable statements from church leaders is an "11" on a scale of 1 to 10.

The fact that you assert it is evidence that it is not the truth.

Maxrep wrote:The quote you have a problem with;

"The brother missionaries have been in the habit of picking out the prettiest women for themselves before they get here, and bringing on the ugly ones for us"

is clearly present on wikipedia. It is properly referenced.

And the reference, to those who know how to read such things, does not trace back to Heber C. Kimball.

It's a spurious quote, which is entirely sufficient explanation for why you like it.

Maxrep wrote:It is maintained on wikipedia, and it will remain in my signature line.

So "honesty" is not something you have any interest in practicing yourself; merely something you wish to preach to others.

Thank you for admitting your brazen hypocrisy.

Maxrep wrote:You claim an angel with a flaiming sword threatened to destroy Joseph if he did not take multiple wives. Which is more plausible, Heber having made the the referenced statement, or an angel waving the flaming sword at joseph?

Another brazen attempt at deflection. Epic fail.

However small a probability you assign to angelic visitors urging obedience to divine commands, the probability of a spurious quote that contradicts a known authentic quote being valid is zero.

Regards,
Pahoran
_cwald
_Emeritus
Posts: 4443
Joined: Sat Jun 09, 2012 4:53 pm

Re: Locked thread..Mod intervention..Pahoran given last word

Post by _cwald »

Maxrep wrote:
cwald wrote:Just another example of chicken s*** moderation at MAD


by the way Max...I got banned last week for calling DB sekek1 out.


Well, selek could pass for pahorans identical twin. Didn't selek1 get banned recently?



Yeah. They banned us both...same day.
"Jesus gave us the gospel, but Satan invented church. It takes serious evil to formalize faith into something tedious and then pile guilt on anyone who doesn’t participate enthusiastically." - Robert Kirby

Beer makes you feel the way you ought to feel without beer. -- Henry Lawson
_3sheets2thewind
_Emeritus
Posts: 1451
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 11:28 pm

Re: Locked thread..Mod intervention..Pahoran given last word

Post by _3sheets2thewind »

Mr. Kiwi just admit your hypocrisy in posting in this place, go back to MAD and ask them for another punch in your martrydom card.
_cwald
_Emeritus
Posts: 4443
Joined: Sat Jun 09, 2012 4:53 pm

Re: Locked thread..Mod intervention..Pahoran given last word

Post by _cwald »

Did I miss Pahoran's explanation about how he got two posts into the thread AFTER it was locked? Who unlocked it, and why was P allowed to post twice, and then have the thread locked again, without giving maxrep a chance to response?

Sounds like business as usual at MAD...and the church in general.
"Jesus gave us the gospel, but Satan invented church. It takes serious evil to formalize faith into something tedious and then pile guilt on anyone who doesn’t participate enthusiastically." - Robert Kirby

Beer makes you feel the way you ought to feel without beer. -- Henry Lawson
_MsJack
_Emeritus
Posts: 4375
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2008 5:06 am

Re: Locked thread..Mod intervention..Pahoran given last word

Post by _MsJack »

cwald wrote:Did I miss Parohan's explanation about how he got two posts into the thread AFTER it was locked? Who unlocked it, and why was P allowed to post twice, and then have the thread locked again, without giving maxrep a chance to response?

What, you mean he had to have the last word and then silence his opposition?

I have it on good authority that such is the behavior of a teenage girl.
"It seems to me that these women were the head (κεφάλαιον) of the church which was at Philippi." ~ John Chrysostom, Homilies on Philippians 13

My Blogs: Weighted Glory | Worlds Without End: A Mormon Studies Roundtable | Twitter
_Pahoran
_Emeritus
Posts: 1296
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 2:20 am

Re: Locked thread..Mod intervention..Pahoran given last word

Post by _Pahoran »

cwald wrote:Did I miss Pahoran's explanation about how he got two posts into the thread AFTER it was locked? Who unlocked it, and why was P allowed to post twice, and then have the thread locked again, without giving maxrep a chance to response?

Sounds like business as usual at MAD...and the church in general.

You aren't very good at following the discussion, are you?

1) Maxrep made two posts and then the thread was closed by a moderator. His were the two posts, not mine.
2) As the thread originator, I reopened the thread to post material I had already started gathering the previous day. I made one post, although it was a fairly (but not unusually) long one. Just one. Did you get it that time?
3) My post largely ignored Maxrep's personal jabs, which I suspect had something to do with why the thread was closed in the first place, and focused upon the provenance of the spurious Kimball quote.
4) Then I reclosed the thread, rather than leaving it dangling open to annoy the mods.
5) The post is still there for anyone who wants to see it.

Any questions?

Now, just to see how well you paid attention: how many posts did I make after the thread was originally locked, cwald?

Regards,
Pahoran
_kamenraider
_Emeritus
Posts: 230
Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2008 5:49 am

Re: Locked thread..Mod intervention..Pahoran given last word

Post by _kamenraider »

"The principle of plurality of wives never will be done away."

I like that. I guess he was right. Thanks for pointing that one out, Pahoran. :wink:
A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth.
--Albert Einstein
_Pahoran
_Emeritus
Posts: 1296
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 2:20 am

Re: Locked thread..Mod intervention..Pahoran given last word

Post by _Pahoran »

kamenraider wrote:"The principle of plurality of wives never will be done away."

I like that. I guess he was right. Thanks for pointing that one out, Pahoran. :wink:

Hey, it's what he said. I don't mind discussing what dead GA's actually did say.

Regards,
Pahoran
Post Reply