Romney: $100,000 a year NOT middle income

The Off-Topic forum for anything non-LDS related, such as sports or politics. Rated PG through PG-13.
Post Reply
_MeDotOrg
_Emeritus
Posts: 4761
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2012 11:29 pm

Romney: $100,000 a year NOT middle income

Post by _MeDotOrg »

So now we know what 'middle income' means:

Romney's comments came an interview broadcast Friday on ABC's "Good Morning America."

"No one can say my plan is going to raise taxes on middle-income people, because principle number one is (to) keep the burden down on middle-income taxpayers," Romney told host George Stephanopoulos.

"Is $100,000 middle income?" Stephanopoulos asked.

"No, middle income is $200,000 to $250,000 and less," Romney responded.


His campaign later clarified that Romney was referencing household income, not individual income.

The Census Bureau reported this week that the median household income — the midpoint for the nation — is just over $50,000.

Most independent analysis says that Romney's tax plan would reduce the tax burden for the wealthiest 5% of Americans, but increase it for everyone else.

Romney's solution is simple: Just redefine what constitutes middle income.
"The great problem of any civilization is how to rejuvenate itself without rebarbarization."
- Will Durant
"We've kept more promises than we've even made"
- Donald Trump
"Of what meaning is the world without mind? The question cannot exist."
- Edwin Land
_Molok
_Emeritus
Posts: 1832
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2010 4:31 am

Re: Romney: $100,000 a year NOT middle income

Post by _Molok »

he did say "and less"
_bcspace
_Emeritus
Posts: 18534
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2006 6:48 pm

Re: Romney: $100,000 a year NOT middle income

Post by _bcspace »

The Democrats used similar figures in 2008 and the subsequent budget fights. That's where tax paying small business owners often fall and now that Obama's thrown them under the bus, he and his media cronies don't need them anymore.
Machina Sublime
Satan's Plan Deconstructed.
Your Best Resource On Joseph Smith's Polygamy.
Conservatism is the Gospel of Christ and the Plan of Salvation in Action.
The Degeneracy Of Progressivism.
_Kevin Graham
_Emeritus
Posts: 13037
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 6:44 pm

Re: Romney: $100,000 a year NOT middle income

Post by _Kevin Graham »

bcspace wrote:The Democrats used similar figures in 2008 and the subsequent budget fights. That's where tax paying small business owners often fall and now that Obama's thrown them under the bus, he and his media cronies don't need them anymore.


As krose has already explained, small businesses have enjoyed tax cuts 18 times under Obama, and taxes don't hinder small businesses from hiring more people anyway. You're just repeating a tired talking point/myth that no one on your side ever takes the time to verify.
_krose
_Emeritus
Posts: 2555
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 1:18 pm

Re: Romney: $100,000 a year NOT middle income

Post by _krose »

bcspace wrote:That's where tax paying small business owners often fall...

"Often" = 4% nowadays?

That's a creative definition. Now I guess I can brag that I "often" eat lobster for dinner.
"The DNA of fictional populations appears to be the most susceptible to extinction." - Simon Southerton
Post Reply