Boring dead drama is boring and dead

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_consiglieri
_Emeritus
Posts: 6186
Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 10:47 pm

Re: Pahoran's Abuse of Private Correspondence

Post by _consiglieri »

Pahoran wrote:
consiglieri wrote:Where's the chicken-crapping-itself icon when you need it?

Why? Running out of Darren McGavin avatars?

Regards,
Pahoran


I was looking for one more along the lines of Grouse L. McGregor.
You prove yourself of the devil and anti-mormon every word you utter, because only the devil perverts facts to make their case.--ldsfaqs (6-24-13)
_Doctor Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 8025
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 4:44 pm

Re: Pahoran's Abuse of Private Correspondence

Post by _Doctor Scratch »

Pahoran wrote:
Doctor Scratch wrote:Indeed. Pahoran is toast. I cheerfully predict that he won't be returning to this thread. MsJack made utter mincemeat out of him, and his only remaining option it to beat a hasty retreat.

Still think so?

Along similar lines, I notice you've abruptly stopped talking to me, and are now confining yourself to talking about me instead -- but only to people you trust to enjoy participating in Echol chamber conversations with you.

Why is that?

Regards,
Pahoran


Hmm. I guess I was wrong. Instead, you are trying to spin this so that MsJack looks petty for complaining about "one sentence!" That was a development I hadn't anticipated.
"[I]f, while hoping that everybody else will be honest and so forth, I can personally prosper through unethical and immoral acts without being detected and without risk, why should I not?." --Daniel Peterson, 6/4/14
_kjones
_Emeritus
Posts: 165
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2011 7:43 pm

Re: Pahoran's Abuse of Private Correspondence

Post by _kjones »

I think that one day both ms jack and pahoran or going to feel very sorry for the they have treated one another. But hey! what do I know? I'm just an old man "crawling towards death"....
_Pahoran
_Emeritus
Posts: 1296
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 2:20 am

Re: Pahoran's Abuse of Private Correspondence

Post by _Pahoran »

Pahoran wrote:You weren't "capriciously banned." You were banned because (1) you called me a liar in a PM in clear violation of the rules, and (2) were so astoundingly arrogant as to draw the mods' attention to it when you whined about me.

Correction: I have since learned, from a reliable source, that the above is not correct. MsJack was banned for reasons unrelated to what she wrote in her PM.

Regards,
Pahoran
_Pahoran
_Emeritus
Posts: 1296
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 2:20 am

Re: Pahoran's Abuse of Private Correspondence

Post by _Pahoran »

Doctor Scratch wrote:Hmm. I guess I was wrong. Instead, you are trying to spin this so that MsJack looks petty for complaining about "one sentence!" That was a development I hadn't anticipated.

Lying is absolutely reflexive with you, isn't it, Scratch?

I am, as you perfectly well know, not trying to "spin" anything; but it is a fact that I never quoted more than a single sentence, and I mentioned that fact as early as Wed Sep 12 at 9:17 pm in a post addressed explicitly to you. How, then, can it possibly be a "development" you "hadn't anticipated?"

Regards,
Pahoran
Last edited by Xenophon on Sun Sep 16, 2012 8:07 am, edited 1 time in total.
_3sheets2thewind
_Emeritus
Posts: 1451
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 11:28 pm

Re: Pahoran's Abuse of Private Correspondence

Post by _3sheets2thewind »

One just can't deny you hypocrisy pahoran, you call this place a trailer park etc, yet in a matter of a week you have raised your to that of holy ghost so you attain God status in this place you deride yet like a dog to its vomit you return to feast on what you regurgitate.
_cwald
_Emeritus
Posts: 4443
Joined: Sat Jun 09, 2012 4:53 pm

Re: Pahoran's Abuse of Private Correspondence

Post by _cwald »

Pahoran wrote:
Pahoran wrote:You weren't "capriciously banned." You were banned because (1) you called me a liar in a PM in clear violation of the rules, and (2) were so astoundingly arrogant as to draw the mods' attention to it when you whined about me.

Correction: I have since learned, from a reliable source, that the above is not correct. MsJack was banned for reasons unrelated to what she wrote in her PM.

Regards,
Pahoran



CFR.
"Jesus gave us the gospel, but Satan invented church. It takes serious evil to formalize faith into something tedious and then pile guilt on anyone who doesn’t participate enthusiastically." - Robert Kirby

Beer makes you feel the way you ought to feel without beer. -- Henry Lawson
_3sheets2thewind
_Emeritus
Posts: 1451
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 11:28 pm

Re: Pahoran's Abuse of Private Correspondence

Post by _3sheets2thewind »


Hmm. I guess I was wrong. Instead, you are trying to spin this so that MsJack looks petty for complaining about "one sentence!" That was a development I hadn't anticipated.


"If a provable accusation makes up less than an undefined percentage of ones total experience in a given sphere, then the accusation is flatly false on its face and the accuser is a bitch propagandist." ~ Willagorean Theorem; William Schryver circa 2012
_Doctor Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 8025
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 4:44 pm

Re: Pahoran's Abuse of Private Correspondence

Post by _Doctor Scratch »

Pah:

Why are you tossing around real names on this thread? Is that your 'exit strategy'? I.e., you're looking to get yourself suspended? And why, given how much you dislike having your own in real life stuff mentioned, would you do this?
"[I]f, while hoping that everybody else will be honest and so forth, I can personally prosper through unethical and immoral acts without being detected and without risk, why should I not?." --Daniel Peterson, 6/4/14
_3sheets2thewind
_Emeritus
Posts: 1451
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 11:28 pm

Re: Pahoran's Abuse of Private Correspondence

Post by _3sheets2thewind »

Doctor Scratch wrote:Pah:

Why are you tossing around real names on this thread? Is that your 'exit strategy'? I.e., you're looking to get yourself suspended? And why, given how much you dislike having your own in real life stuff mentioned, would you do this?


Because he is the worst kind of hypocrite.
Post Reply