Boring dead drama is boring and dead
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 1451
- Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 11:28 pm
Re: Pahoran's Abuse of Private Correspondence
Cwald...like many FAIRisees and Danites, Paharon does not honor cfrs, he uses name calling, smoke screen and non sequitar.
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 4443
- Joined: Sat Jun 09, 2012 4:53 pm
Re: Pahoran's Abuse of Private Correspondence
3sheets2thewind wrote:Cwald...like many FAIRisees and Danites, Paharon does not honor cfrs, he uses name calling, smoke screen and non sequitar.
And what do you suppose would happen if I refused to honor a CFR at MAD?
"Jesus gave us the gospel, but Satan invented church. It takes serious evil to formalize faith into something tedious and then pile guilt on anyone who doesn’t participate enthusiastically." - Robert Kirby
Beer makes you feel the way you ought to feel without beer. -- Henry Lawson
Beer makes you feel the way you ought to feel without beer. -- Henry Lawson
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 1296
- Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 2:20 am
Re: Pahoran's Abuse of Private Correspondence
cwald wrote:Pahoran wrote:Correction: I have since learned, from a reliable source, that the above is not correct. MsJack was banned for reasons unrelated to what she wrote in her PM.
CFR.
Certainly. I reference a PM I received from a moderator at MA&DB, correcting my error and explicitly asking me to correct it over here.
Mind you, a PM is not a publicly available source, and the only thing I can do is quote it; but there it is.
cwald wrote:And what do you suppose would happen if I refused to honor a CFR at MAD?
How is that relevant to anything here? I haven't refused anything. Of course you all assumed that I would, but your assumption was wrong, as usual.
Regards,
Pahoran
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 3088
- Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2010 9:15 am
Re: Pahoran's Abuse of Private Correspondence
Paharon wrote:I haven't refused anything.
You refused to give permission to post the PMs.
Are you a slow learner and a fast forgetter?
a.k.a. Pokatator joined Oct 26, 2006 and permanently banned from MAD Nov 6, 2006
"Stop being such a damned coward and use your real name to own your position."
"That's what he gets for posting in his own name."
2 different threads same day 2 hours apart Yohoo Bat 12/1/2015
"Stop being such a damned coward and use your real name to own your position."
"That's what he gets for posting in his own name."
2 different threads same day 2 hours apart Yohoo Bat 12/1/2015
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 14190
- Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 10:23 am
Re: Pahoran's Abuse of Private Correspondence
Tator wrote:Pahoran wrote:I haven't refused anything.
You refused to give permission to post the PMs.
Are you a slow learner and a fast forgetter?
Just for the avoidance of doubt, this is the crucial exchange:
Pahoran wrote:MsJack wrote:It would be zero invasion of privacy, because you have my permission to do so.
Do I have your permission to post our MDB private correspondence in its entirety?
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
This is not a hard question.
And the answer is: C, None of the above. I'm going to leave it up to your conscience. Let us see how highly you value the "sanctity" of PM's. If my posting of one sentence from a PM you "trusted" me with was such a horrendous violation, I want to see how your principles stack up.
MsJack asked Pahoran for permission to post their PM exchanges on the MADboard, which she maintains will show that he was extremely rude to her, and that she on the other hand has nothing to reproach herself about.
Did he give her permission?
No, he did not.
Posting any part of a PM exchange on a message board without permission is generally considered to be a violation of propriety.
Pahoran did that. MsJack did not. And won't either, as he well knows.
Yet somehow he attempts to extract some kind of moral superiority for himself out of that situation.
Zadok:
I did not have a faith crisis. I discovered that the Church was having a truth crisis.
Maksutov:
That's the problem with this supernatural stuff, it doesn't really solve anything. It's a placeholder for ignorance.
I did not have a faith crisis. I discovered that the Church was having a truth crisis.
Maksutov:
That's the problem with this supernatural stuff, it doesn't really solve anything. It's a placeholder for ignorance.
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 3088
- Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2010 9:15 am
Re: Pahoran's Abuse of Private Correspondence
Chap
That summed up 5 pages of posts into one short post.
Thanx
That summed up 5 pages of posts into one short post.
Thanx
a.k.a. Pokatator joined Oct 26, 2006 and permanently banned from MAD Nov 6, 2006
"Stop being such a damned coward and use your real name to own your position."
"That's what he gets for posting in his own name."
2 different threads same day 2 hours apart Yohoo Bat 12/1/2015
"Stop being such a damned coward and use your real name to own your position."
"That's what he gets for posting in his own name."
2 different threads same day 2 hours apart Yohoo Bat 12/1/2015
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 8025
- Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 4:44 pm
Re: Pahoran's Abuse of Private Correspondence
You still haven't finished cleaning up your mess, Pahoran. I ask you again: why do you post in real life material when you so dislike it when it's done to you?
"[I]f, while hoping that everybody else will be honest and so forth, I can personally prosper through unethical and immoral acts without being detected and without risk, why should I not?." --Daniel Peterson, 6/4/14
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 1296
- Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 2:20 am
Re: Pahoran's Abuse of Private Correspondence
Tator wrote:Paharon wrote:I haven't refused anything.
You refused to give permission to post the PMs.
Are you a slow learner and a fast forgetter?
I was talking about Cwald's claim that I refused to honour a CFR. I didn't claim never to have refused to do anything in my whole life; the statement has a context.
Is your attention span less than the length of two posts?
Regards,
Pahoran
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 1296
- Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 2:20 am
Re: Pahoran's Abuse of Private Correspondence
Chap wrote:MsJack asked Pahoran for permission to post their PM exchanges on the MADboard, which she maintains will show that he was extremely rude to her, and that she on the other hand has nothing to reproach herself about.
That's false.
MsJack has already posted the PM exchange from MD&DB. She asked me for "permission" to post the entirety of a long PM exchange on this board.
Get it right.
Chap wrote:Did he give her permission?
No, he did not.
Posting any part of a PM exchange on a message board without permission is generally considered to be a violation of propriety.
Pahoran did that. MsJack did not. And won't either, as he well knows.
I know no such thing.
I posted one sentence and then a few short excerpts from that same sentence. MsJack posted considerably more and justified it with "But he did it first!!!"
I have every reason to believe that MsJack's talent for making excuses is entirely equal to the occasion should she decide to go ahead and post that exchange. And the ability of her tame audience to "extract some kind of moral superiority" for her is likewise robust enough to do the job.
Indeed, if MsJack were to announce that she was eating babies, and I were to say I disapproved of that, her loyal following would immediately denounce me as a "misogynist," or something.
Regards,
Pahoran
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 1296
- Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 2:20 am
Re: Pahoran's Abuse of Private Correspondence
Doctor Scratch wrote:You still haven't finished cleaning up your mess, Pahoran. I ask you again: why do you post in real life material when you so dislike it when it's done to you?
Sorry, did I post someone's in real life information?
Regards,
Pahoran