Boring dead drama is boring and dead

[_why me]

Chap

That summed up 5 pages of posts into one short post.

Thanx

Good to hear from you again Tator head. Where have you been? I missed you. How are all the tators doing?

[_Chap]

I have every reason to believe that MsJack's talent for making excuses is entirely equal to the occasion should she decide to go ahead and post that exchange. And the ability of her tame audience to "extract some kind of moral superiority" for her is likewise robust enough to do the job.

When that happens, Pahoran can complain. Complaining before that happens is rather like the good old 'But what would you do if the Book of Mormon was proved true' tactic.

Indeed, if MsJack were to announce that she was eating babies, and I were to say I disapproved of that, her loyal following would immediately denounce me as a "misogynist," or something.

Yes, of course we would. How did Pahoran find that out?

(I can't really complain too much about the 'If X was to eat babies' ploy, since I do remember once saying that if Thomas S. Monson was to devour babies on the podium during General Conference we would see posts explaining that the babies in question were urgently needed in the CK, so it was a blessing in disguise, that it was a long time since breakfast so we shouldn't be too harsh, or that he was eating them as a man, not as a prophet, and nobody said the prophet was perfect.)

[_Doctor Scratch]

You still haven't finished cleaning up your mess, Pahoran. I ask you again: why do you post in real life material when you so dislike it when it's done to you?

Sorry, did I post someone's in real life information?

Regards,
Pahoran

Oh, so you'd rather play games? Are you sure about that? I mean, it's easy enough for virtually anyone to "accidentally" post all kinds of things.

[_Pahoran]

Sorry, did I post someone's in real life information?

Regards,
Pahoran

Oh, so you'd rather play games? Are you sure about that? I mean, it's easy enough for virtually anyone to "accidentally" post all kinds of things.

Temper, temper!

And while I made no "mess" to clean up, I have removed the other hint. I wasn't sure if you'd spotted it.

You're a special case, Scratch; probably a unique one. You had to know your anonymity wouldn't last forever.

So what are you going to do now that you can no longer anonymously libel people with impunity? "Cower in terror" perhaps?

Regards,
Pahoran

[_3sheets2thewind]

While Chap has summed the whole thing, one point was missed.

When one is raging hypocrite like paharon the kiwi who write about "real missionaries", and when one has anoited themself as the kiwi has, then rules do not apply to such person.

Such is nature and hypocrisy of the self annoited. Posters Mac Greg, or William S, bill hamblin, juliann Reynolds will not live a standard they hold others too...their hypocrisy is done to support their own vain ambitions and nothing more.

Poster Mac Greg, or/and many other apologists hypocrites go to mddb and talk about what a horrible place this board is, yet the kiwi is about to reach god status....the kiwi has no moral ground to stand because he has no morals to defend.

[_Pahoran]

I have every reason to believe that MsJack's talent for making excuses is entirely equal to the occasion should she decide to go ahead and post that exchange. And the ability of her tame audience to "extract some kind of moral superiority" for her is likewise robust enough to do the job.

When that happens, Pahoran can complain. Complaining before that happens is rather like the good old 'But what would you do if the Book of Mormon was proved true' tactic.

I'm not complaining about anything. I'm pointing out that I don't "well know" that MsJack would never under any circumstances post the PM's.

Indeed, if MsJack were to announce that she was eating babies, and I were to say I disapproved of that, her loyal following would immediately denounce me as a "misogynist," or something.

Yes, of course we would. How did Pahoran find that out?

Simply by observing the pattern of posting around here. For instance, on page 3 of this thread, the most cowardly and worthless swine on the whole internet called me a coward and misogynist simply for refusing to be bullied.

Regards,
Pahoran

[_Pahoran]

While Chap has summed the whole thing, one point was missed.

When one is raging hypocrite like paharon the kiwi who write about "real missionaries", and when one has anoited themself as the kiwi has, then rules do not apply to such person.

Such is nature and hypocrisy of the self annoited. Posters Mac Greg, or William S, bill hamblin, juliann Reynolds will not live a standard they hold others too...their hypocrisy is done to support their own vain ambitions and nothing more.

Poster Mac Greg, or/and many other apologists hypocrites go to mddb and talk about what a horrible place this board is, yet the kiwi is about to reach god status....the kiwi has no moral ground to stand because he has no morals to defend.

Your screenname is well chosen.

When have I written about "real missionaries?" To what do you refer?

I'm approaching the status you mentioned by dint of having almost one tenth as many posts here as I do on my home board. I haven't posted here in months, and I am posting now only because, just in case you were too drunk to notice, this thread is about me. I realise that there is so little to talk about in this echo chamber that you have to obsessively talk about MD&DB participants behind our backs, but that doesn't mean we have no right of reply. Exactly how does that mean that I have "no morals to defend?"

Regards,
Pahoran

[_3sheets2thewind]

Paharon , unlike kiwis whose allegiance is to a mortal crown, Americans can not libel/defame with the truth.

[_Doctor Scratch]

Temper, temper!

And while I made no "mess" to clean up, I have removed the other hint. I wasn't sure if you'd spotted it.

You're a special case, Scratch; probably a unique one. You had to know your anonymity wouldn't last forever.

So what are you going to do now that you can no longer anonymously libel people with impunity? "Cower in terror" perhaps?

Regards,
Pahoran

Didn't you post four "hints"? Not that it matters, of course. I was half-hoping that you'd opt to "play games," sort of like what you've been doing with MsJack. Oh, and you *are* a coward and a misogynist. I mean, really: am I alone here in thinking that it's only men with major-league, gender-related insecurity issues who boast about how they aren't "whipped"?

[_Pahoran]

Didn't you post four "hints"?

I did! But the other two weren't about your in real life identity, but to another of your screennames. AFAICT, they don't count.

Not that it matters, of course. I was half-hoping that you'd opt to "play games," sort of like what you've been doing with MsJack.

Whatever my differences with MsJack (and they are significant) you flatter yourself beyond all recognition when you presume to equate yourself with her.

Oh, and you *are* a coward and a misogynist. I mean, really: am I alone here in thinking that it's only men with major-league, gender-related insecurity issues who boast about how they aren't "whipped"?

Yes, you are.

And I didn't "boast."

Regards,
Pahoran