Is Mopologetics Inherently Evil?

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_Bob Loblaw
_Emeritus
Posts: 3323
Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2012 2:26 am

Is Mopologetics Inherently Evil?

Post by _Bob Loblaw »

I'm not talking about the sincere people who honestly present evidence they believe supports the LDS church, and there are plenty of those. I mean the strange beast that is mopologetics: the bizarre need to use any and all tactics, no matter how dishonest and/or cruel, to not only support the LDS church but to destroy, as thoroughly as possible, those who would sow doubt.

I don't use the word "evil" lightly, and I hesitate to call an individual evil, but clearly, much of what passes for apologetics is evil. Even if we believe in the LDS church--in fact, particularly if we believe in the church--we should not be afraid to identify behavior that crosses a line. I have and will continue to call out bad behavior among critics, but I reserve the right to apply the same standards to apologists.
"It doesn't seem fair, does it Norm--that I should have so much knowledge when there are people in the world that have to go to bed stupid every night." -- Clifford C. Clavin, USPS

"¡No contaban con mi astucia!" -- El Chapulin Colorado
_Mercury
_Emeritus
Posts: 5545
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 2:14 pm

Re: Is Mopologetics Inherently Evil?

Post by _Mercury »

If you can't win by stating correct facts, just whine and blabber, thrashing about on the floor with cries of "Mormon persecution" and similar weasel tactics. They know, for the most part, that their position is indefensible.
And crawling on the planet's face
Some insects called the human race
Lost in time
And lost in space...and meaning
_son of Ishmael
_Emeritus
Posts: 1690
Joined: Sat May 12, 2012 1:46 am

Re: Is Mopologetics Inherently Evil?

Post by _son of Ishmael »

The main problem with Mormon apologetics is that none of it matters. The LDS church prides itself on having authority from God to act on his behalf. LDS GA’s are constantly reminding the members and the world that they and only they can speak for God on matters of Church Doctrine. Self appointed apologists can say anything they want but none of it holds any water because it is not the official church position. The fact that some of the LDS GA’s are willing hide behind what some apologist say without taking any responsibility for what is being said so they can pull the “speaking as a man” card in case someone says something too out of line just does not change anything.

I don’t agree with most (all?) of what BRM and BKP ever said but at least they had the balls to get up and say what they really thought even if the boys in the COB are quick to rush in and “clarify”

We would do well to stop giving Mormon apologists any credence at all.
I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use. - Galileo

Yeah, well, that's just, like, your opinion, man. - The Dude

Don't you know there ain't no devil, there's just god when he's drunk - Tom Waits
_Bob Loblaw
_Emeritus
Posts: 3323
Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2012 2:26 am

Re: Is Mopologetics Inherently Evil?

Post by _Bob Loblaw »

son of Ishmael wrote:The main problem with Mormon apologetics is that none of it matters. ...

We would do well to stop giving Mormon apologists any credence at all.


Yup. It's all just wasted effort on nothing of value or importance. It just makes it worse that they use dishonesty and hate for something worthless.
"It doesn't seem fair, does it Norm--that I should have so much knowledge when there are people in the world that have to go to bed stupid every night." -- Clifford C. Clavin, USPS

"¡No contaban con mi astucia!" -- El Chapulin Colorado
_son of Ishmael
_Emeritus
Posts: 1690
Joined: Sat May 12, 2012 1:46 am

Re: Is Mopologetics Inherently Evil?

Post by _son of Ishmael »

Having them around is a win win for the GA's. If something they say keeps someone in the church and paying tithing then great. if they say something that blows back on the Church they can claim that the person is not speaking for the church and throw them under the bus.
I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use. - Galileo

Yeah, well, that's just, like, your opinion, man. - The Dude

Don't you know there ain't no devil, there's just god when he's drunk - Tom Waits
_Bob Loblaw
_Emeritus
Posts: 3323
Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2012 2:26 am

Re: Is Mopologetics Inherently Evil?

Post by _Bob Loblaw »

son of Ishmael wrote:Having them around is a win win for the GA's. If something they say keeps someone in the church and paying tithing then great. if they say something that blows back on the Church they can claim that the person is not speaking for the church and throw them under the bus.


Unfortunately, they do much more of the latter than the former. The simple fact is that they don't care about the effects their actions and words have on members of the church. The need to be "right" and feel superior Trump's any consideration for the damage done to other church members.
"It doesn't seem fair, does it Norm--that I should have so much knowledge when there are people in the world that have to go to bed stupid every night." -- Clifford C. Clavin, USPS

"¡No contaban con mi astucia!" -- El Chapulin Colorado
_son of Ishmael
_Emeritus
Posts: 1690
Joined: Sat May 12, 2012 1:46 am

Re: Is Mopologetics Inherently Evil?

Post by _son of Ishmael »

Bob Loblaw wrote:
son of Ishmael wrote:Having them around is a win win for the GA's. If something they say keeps someone in the church and paying tithing then great. if they say something that blows back on the Church they can claim that the person is not speaking for the church and throw them under the bus.


Unfortunately, they do much more of the latter than the former. The simple fact is that they don't care about the effects their actions and words have on members of the church. The need to be "right" and feel superior Trump's any consideration for the damage done to other church members.



"The need to be "right" and feel superior..." Very good point. Their own personal testimonies hang on them being right every time. If they ever concede a point no matter how small, it creates a chink in their armor.
I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use. - Galileo

Yeah, well, that's just, like, your opinion, man. - The Dude

Don't you know there ain't no devil, there's just god when he's drunk - Tom Waits
_Bob Loblaw
_Emeritus
Posts: 3323
Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2012 2:26 am

Re: Is Mopologetics Inherently Evil?

Post by _Bob Loblaw »

son of Ishmael wrote:"The need to be "right" and feel superior..." Very good point. Their own personal testimonies hang on them being right every time. If they ever concede a point no matter how small, it creates a chink in their armor.


That is one of the character traits that separates apologists from mopologists. Apologists are honest, and when a critic is right, they concede the point. Mopologists never concede anything. Exhibit A is Pahoran's pathetic attempt to justify sharing MsJack's PM publicly. An honest person would say, "I shouldn't have done that. I'm sorry." But Rusty can't be bothered because to admit a mistake is to appear weak.
"It doesn't seem fair, does it Norm--that I should have so much knowledge when there are people in the world that have to go to bed stupid every night." -- Clifford C. Clavin, USPS

"¡No contaban con mi astucia!" -- El Chapulin Colorado
_Doctor Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 8025
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 4:44 pm

Re: Is Mopologetics Inherently Evil?

Post by _Doctor Scratch »

Yes: by definition, Mopologetics is "evil." That's because it's different from basic apologetics, which is simply a defense of the faith. Thus there is a noticeable gulf between something "apologetic," like, say, Rough Stone Rolling, and, e.g., "Text and Context," or the latest Midgley piece in the MI. Mopologists don't really have any remaining decency or scruples--they've cast aside the etiquette of normal scholarly (or, heck, just normal day-to-day) interaction in favor of ad hominem attack, smear campaigns, character assassination, and "hit pieces." There is no "good" in this; it is entirely about revenge. It's not about saving people's testimonies (or, at least, it is only tangentially about this); it's not about defending the Restored Gospel. It's about the seriously misguided hope that they can stomp the everliving bejesus out of Church critics. It's about them taking out all the old grudges that the feel over getting made fun of for believing in Mormonism.

This isn't to say that the Mopologists don't also do regular apologetics. I would just say that, by definition, "Mopologetics" is the "defense of the faith" that crosses over into genuinely bad and unscrupulous behavior.
"[I]f, while hoping that everybody else will be honest and so forth, I can personally prosper through unethical and immoral acts without being detected and without risk, why should I not?." --Daniel Peterson, 6/4/14
_ludwigm
_Emeritus
Posts: 10158
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 8:07 am

Re: Is Mopologetics Inherently Evil?

Post by _ludwigm »

Bob Loblaw wrote: I mean the strange beast that is mopologetics: the bizarre need to use any and all tactics, no matter how dishonest and/or cruel ...


[#img] http://wumocomicstrip.com/img/strip/-WM ... -06-13.gif[#/img]
- Whenever a poet or preacher, chief or wizard spouts gibberish, the human race spends centuries deciphering the message. - Umberto Eco
- To assert that the earth revolves around the sun is as erroneous as to claim that Jesus was not born of a virgin. - Cardinal Bellarmine at the trial of Galilei
Post Reply