You were misusing an archaic term from psychoanalysis...
No, I was using a key term from the early and heady days of the sexual revolution. "Polymorphous perversity" and polymorphous sexual hedonism - sex in many and varied forms without regard to consequences or moral reflection - which were the sine qua non of the sexual revolution, including its Frankfurt School promulgators (and remains so today within postmodern thought).
later coopted by a Marxist that you supposedly don't believe in? Even better. At least polyamorous would've made sense.
No, I don't believe in Marcuse' project of the tearing down and destruction of western civilization to make way for a new Dionysian world of moral relativity and social/economic collectivism. His meaning in the use of the term, however, has since become the default position of the pop culture, and for substantial numbers of citizens - an unsustainable course, I might add.
Yes, I'm not a libertarian because of the libertarian views I advocate.
I've never - ever - seen you advocate clearly libertarian views save in a nebulous, dry, technocratic, policy-wonkish way. If never seen a single sentence of libertarian first principles or philosophy from you, nor have I ever seen very many leftist ideas, policies, and structures you do not vigorously, and not infrequently, angrily support and defend.
You're visceral hatred of conservatism is also a dead giveaway, as modern (mid-1950s to present) conservatism is a hybrid of traditional and libertarian concepts, principles, values, and perspectives. I suspect that what you really are is a Bill Maher "libertarian," essentially a viscerally anti-religious secularist who wants government out of his own personal life, wants no controls or conditioning restraints on personal behavior, but who looks longingly at the welfare state as a moral surrogate to compensate for his own lack of moral imagination and personal ethical integrity.
This is ultimately what Pragmatism (and Utilitarianism) imply and encourage, in an ethical sense, as both these ethical systems provide no ultimate ground for moral, ethical, or social standards save what a specific cohort, group, generation, and era decide is so, based on various arbitrary and plastic criteria (what "works" or what the smart people say is the case).
But keep up the pose, as I really don't care.