All in? No place for NOMs

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_Yoda

Re: All in? No place for NOMs

Post by _Yoda »

Bob Loblaw wrote:
liz3564 wrote:I must say, you are a very good boy on my site. :wink:


I can't imagine that. :smile:


Some rule with an iron fist...I rule with an iron paddle! :wink:
_why me
_Emeritus
Posts: 9589
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 8:19 pm

Re: All in? No place for NOMs

Post by _why me »

bcspace wrote:It's the same with all organizations. A simple example would be that I cannot generally participate on a NOM message board by saying whatever I please.

.


You are right. Try to go over to the Postmo site and write something positive about the LDS church. A banning will certainly follow. The purity of postmoism cannot be soiled by positive posts about the LDS faith. The same for the exmo board. And yet these same people cry free speech in the blogger case. Unbelievable hypocrisy.
I intend to lay a foundation that will revolutionize the whole world.
Joseph Smith


We are “to feed the hungry, to clothe the naked, to provide for the widow, to dry up the tear of the orphan, to comfort the afflicted, whether in this church, or in any other, or in no church at all…”
Joseph Smith
_bcspace
_Emeritus
Posts: 18534
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2006 6:48 pm

Re: All in? No place for NOMs

Post by _bcspace »

A simple example would be that I cannot generally participate on a NOM message board by saying whatever I please.

:lol: You're right about that! LOL

I must say, you are a very good boy on my site. :wink:


Yes, yes I am. However, I had another site in mind. On your site, I've generally been able to express the same content much as I do here.

You are right. Try to go over to the Postmo site and write something positive about the LDS church. A banning will certainly follow. The purity of postmoism cannot be soiled by positive posts about the LDS faith. The same for the exmo board. And yet these same people cry free speech in the blogger case. Unbelievable hypocrisy.


Amen. It's the standard tactic among all leftwingers which most ex and anti mos are.
Last edited by Guest on Fri Sep 21, 2012 8:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Machina Sublime
Satan's Plan Deconstructed.
Your Best Resource On Joseph Smith's Polygamy.
Conservatism is the Gospel of Christ and the Plan of Salvation in Action.
The Degeneracy Of Progressivism.
_Bob Loblaw
_Emeritus
Posts: 3323
Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2012 2:26 am

Re: All in? No place for NOMs

Post by _Bob Loblaw »

why me wrote:You are right. Try to go over to the Postmo site and write something positive about the LDS church. A banning will certainly follow. The purity of postmoism cannot be soiled by positive posts about the LDS faith. The same for the exmo board. And yet these same people cry free speech in the blogger case. Unbelievable hypocrisy.


I've made positive posts about the LDS church on postmormon.org and never had any problems. I suspect your banning had more to do with being creepy and whiny.
"It doesn't seem fair, does it Norm--that I should have so much knowledge when there are people in the world that have to go to bed stupid every night." -- Clifford C. Clavin, USPS

"¡No contaban con mi astucia!" -- El Chapulin Colorado
_Yoda

Re: All in? No place for NOMs

Post by _Yoda »

BC wrote:Yes, yes I am. However, I had another site in mind. On your site, I've generally been able to express the same content much as I do here.


Minus the snark. You are a "kinder, gentler" BC on GeekyNOMs. :wink:
_bcspace
_Emeritus
Posts: 18534
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2006 6:48 pm

Re: All in? No place for NOMs

Post by _bcspace »

Yes, some people can only take a hit from the large gold brick of truth when it has a slice of lemon wrapped around it.
Machina Sublime
Satan's Plan Deconstructed.
Your Best Resource On Joseph Smith's Polygamy.
Conservatism is the Gospel of Christ and the Plan of Salvation in Action.
The Degeneracy Of Progressivism.
_Bob Loblaw
_Emeritus
Posts: 3323
Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2012 2:26 am

Re: All in? No place for NOMs

Post by _Bob Loblaw »

bcspace wrote:Yes, some people can only take a hit from the large gold brick of truth with a slice of lemon wrapped around it.


Some people think it's important to actually have a brick of truth under the lemon. Your batting average is pretty low.
"It doesn't seem fair, does it Norm--that I should have so much knowledge when there are people in the world that have to go to bed stupid every night." -- Clifford C. Clavin, USPS

"¡No contaban con mi astucia!" -- El Chapulin Colorado
_bcspace
_Emeritus
Posts: 18534
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2006 6:48 pm

Re: All in? No place for NOMs

Post by _bcspace »

Indeed some people think 100% is pretty low especially when double standards are involved.
Machina Sublime
Satan's Plan Deconstructed.
Your Best Resource On Joseph Smith's Polygamy.
Conservatism is the Gospel of Christ and the Plan of Salvation in Action.
The Degeneracy Of Progressivism.
_Bob Loblaw
_Emeritus
Posts: 3323
Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2012 2:26 am

Re: All in? No place for NOMs

Post by _Bob Loblaw »

bcspace wrote:Indeed some people think 100% is pretty low especially when double standards are involved.


Yeah, I'd say you're batting about 100. Definitely not 1000.
"It doesn't seem fair, does it Norm--that I should have so much knowledge when there are people in the world that have to go to bed stupid every night." -- Clifford C. Clavin, USPS

"¡No contaban con mi astucia!" -- El Chapulin Colorado
_zeezrom
_Emeritus
Posts: 11938
Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2009 8:57 pm

Re: All in? No place for NOMs

Post by _zeezrom »

I guess I'm a little confused about the criteria for disciplining folks. Some people can express criticisms and not have a problem while others like the Mormon Think guy are not so lucky. What's up?
Oh for shame, how the mortals put the blame on us gods, for they say evils come from us, but it is they, rather, who by their own recklessness win sorrow beyond what is given... Zeus (1178 BC)

The Holy Sacrament.
Post Reply