Boring dead drama is boring and dead

[_Pahoran]

Jesus was certainly rough on some people. According to what I remember, he reserved his harshest words for those who abused positions of power and religious hypocrites.

Hypocrites?

You mean, like those who demand a different standard from their opponents than they do from their friends?

More to the point of your original assertion (before the tap dance to milquetoast) is his statement involving cheeks.

And someone who ignores the teachings of Jesus in her own life has a lot of cheek demanding that others conform to her self-serving interpretation thereof in their interactions with her.

Regards,
Pahoran

[_Pahoran]

The reason why faithful, believing, covenant-keeping Latter-day Saints don't stay in this sty for very long is not, as you fondly delude yourselves, fear; it's disgust.

In your case, it *is* fear, hence why you were soiling yourself over the prospect of MsJack posting your PMs,

I think you are projecting. Either that, or coprophilia is another of your, um, peccadilloes.

So, is it?

Your posting pattern in this thread suggests that you may be annoyed about something. What might that be?

Regards,
Pahoran

[_Pahoran]

Or because they don't want their DH with massive heart troubles to learn that they were engaged in cyber-adultery with The Nehor.

You seem to be lashing out angrily at a number of people in this thread. Why is that?

Regards,
Pahoran

[_sock puppet]

Pahoran,

In this thread, you have shown your hypocrisy in so many ways.

In the name of a Christian religion, you have been decidedly unChristian. Christianity is about the means and methods of living and treating others; you justify your breach of those guidelines by 'the ends' of defending "the Church". Here's a clue, Christianity (real or myth, take your pick) is about how one treats others. You like to point to Jesus throwing money changers out of the temple. How does coming to the defense of a prostitute fit with the modus operandi of "the Church" and your own conduct? When's the last time you ran to defend such a 'sinner'?

You have realized that you do not have the integrity of your principles in the way that MsJack does hers. Yet being outdistanced in morality and the discipline to live according to it, you use that against her to deny giving context to the PM snippet you have published. You do it to leave a misleading impression in the minds of others that saw only your snippet. I'm sure Jesus will reward you with many gold stars for your forehead for having used another's integrity to mislead third parties.

You have tried to expose in real life identity information, while decrying your own loosely veiled identity being bandied about. In your particular Pharisaical brand, you complain about reiterations of what is already widely known, your in real life identity. Yet you come in and drop hints of someone else's in real life identity that is not widely known, in fact is yet quite secret and guarded.

I can't wait to see how you top yourself, how you go beyond these hypocrisies. It must be my limited imagination, but I cannot fathom how you will outdo your hypocritical track record.

But as SWK's motto was, "Do it!"

[_Pahoran]

Pahoran,

In this thread, you have shown your hypocrisy in so many ways.

In the name of a Christian religion,

CFR that I have claimed to have posted anything "In the name of a Christian religion." Or in the name of any religion, really.

you have been decidedly unChristian.

I can't wait to see how you justify that ridiculous accusation.

Christianity is about the means and methods of living and treating others; you justify your breach of those guidelines

What breach?

by 'the ends' of defending "the Church".

CFR that I have offered any such justification.

Here's a clue, Christianity (real or myth, take your pick) is about how one treats others. You like to point to Jesus throwing money changers out of the temple. How does coming to the defense of a prostitute fit with the modus operandi of "the Church" and your own conduct? When's the last time you ran to defend such a 'sinner'?

When was the last time I saw one being stoned?

Apart from you. You seem to post as if you are stoned, but that's a different matter.

You have realized that you do not have the integrity of your principles in the way that MsJack does hers.

Have I? CFR that I have "realized" any such thing.

Yet being outdistanced in morality and the discipline to live according to it, you use that against her to deny giving context to the PM snippet you have published.

Do I? CFR, please.

I think you are confused.

You do it to leave a misleading impression in the minds of others that saw only your snippet.

Do I?

And this is how you follow the teaching of Jesus to not judge others, is it?

Snip pious platitudes.

You have tried to expose in real life identity information, while decrying your own loosely veiled identity being bandied about. In your particular Pharisaical brand, you complain about reiterations of what is already widely known, your in real life identity.

Where?

Yet you come in and drop hints of someone else's in real life identity that is not widely known, in fact is yet quite secret and guarded.

You forgot to mention that the foul stench you are defending has for years carried out a relentless campaign of defamation and harassment against someone in real life while hiding behind his own veil of anonymity. Do you want to talk about "integrity" in that regard, lamb chop?

Are you one of the utterly integrity-free swine who connived at his scumbaggery and helped to cover up for him?

Inquiring minds want to know!

Regards,
Pahoran

[_sock puppet]

Quite predictable and boring reply, Pahoran.

You'll have to do much better than that to bait me.

[_Pahoran]

Quite predictable and boring reply, Pahoran.

You'll have to do much better than that to bait me.

So, no support for your spiteful accusations, then.

Why am I not surprised?

I'm sorry you're bored, Charlie Horse. For myself, I find the spectacle of you lecturing me -- or anyone at all, really -- about Christian behaviour, to be highly entertaining.

Regards,
Pahoran

[_sethpayne]

CFR that I have claimed to have posted anything "In the name of a Christian religion." Or in the name of any religion, really.

Hi Pahoran,

O God, the Eternal Father, we ask thee in the name of thy Son, Jesus Christ, to bless and sanctify this bread to the souls of all those who partake of it; that they may eat in remembrance of the body of thy Son, and witness unto thee, O God, the Eternal Father, that they are willing to take upon them the name of thy Son, and always remember him, and keep his commandments which he hath given them, that they may always have his Spirit to be with them. Amen

I assume you take the sacrament regularly. We have taken upon ourselves (willingly) the name of Christ and thus, everything we do is, or should be, a reflection of him.

We all fall horribly short. I lost my temper last night with BC ... something that Christ would not have done -- at least not in the inappropriate way which I did.

When you or me or anyone else who claims to be a Christian -- and especially those of us who take the sacrament seriously -- have an obligation to carry his name and be examples of his attributes. That's how I interpret the sacrament prayer - and Mosiah -- anyway.

Seth

[_Bob Loblaw]

We all fall horribly short. I lost my temper last night with BC ... something that Christ would not have done -- at least not in the inappropriate way which I did.

I'm not so sure about that.

When you or me or anyone else who claims to be a Christian -- and especially those of us who take the sacrament seriously -- have an obligation to carry his name and be examples of his attributes. That's how I interpret the sacrament prayer - and Mosiah -- anyway.

Seth

Don't you know that Christian behavior ends the moment someone criticizes the LDS church?

[_sock puppet]

Quite predictable and boring reply, Pahoran.

You'll have to do much better than that to bait me.

So, no support for your spiteful accusations, then.

Why am I not surprised?

I'm sorry you're bored, Charlie Horse. For myself, I find the spectacle of you lecturing me -- or anyone at all, really -- about Christian behaviour, to be highly entertaining.

Regards,
Pahoran

The support is replete through this very thread. I am not going off on your wild goose chase to correlate it for you. Don't you have a committee that will do that for you?