cinepro wrote:Jaybear wrote:Do you believe global warming is a hoax?
It's possible to agree that global warming is real but disagree on the wisest course of action to deal with it.
Do you believe Roe v Wade should be overturned?
I didn't know that was an issue. Has Romney talked about working to overturn it as President?
Do you think we need to spend more or less money on defense spending?
I think less, so if that's what you're saying too, I'm with you there.
Should the rich get a tax cut, or pay more in taxes?
I think everyone should pay less in taxes, and since the rich pay the majority of taxes, that would mean they would also get a tax cut.
Should we cut federal funding to planned parenthood, to PBS?
As long as the government is broke, yes. I don't know why we need to borrow money to fund public television and subsidize abortions.
Should you think we need more religion in our public schools?
I wasn't aware of Romney trying to get more religion into the public schools. Has this come up in the campaign?
Do you believe that Americans have a second amendment right to assault rifles, extended carbines, and armor piercing bullets?
I wasn't aware that Romney was trying to increase access for people to those weapons. Has this been something he talks about?
Do you believe gays should have the right to marry?
No.
Do you think we should open up national parks and lands to drilling?
If it can be done in an environmentally responsible manner, sure.
Do you believe that tax cuts pay for themselves?
No. Tax cuts have to be accompanied by reduced spending.
DO you believe in Keynesian economic theory?
No. I would if it worked, but it doesn't.
Do you believe that we should offer a undocumented citizens a path to citizenship, or encourage them to self deport?
As far as I know, they
have a "path to citizenship". People become citizens all the time. I don't think our current situation with illegal aliens is good and something needs to change. But since Obama and Romney appear to be equally incompetent on the subject (and unable to propose a lucid plan of any sort), it's a moot point for me.
DO you think we need more or less corporate money in our elections?
If restrictions on "corporate money" are also applied to "union money", I'm all for it. It would certainly change things dramatically for politicians, but whether or not it would actually "improve" things, only time would tell.
Not sure how anyone can be on the fence.
After the last four years, I agree.