Leher couldn't control the debate. The question choices were unimaginative and therefore easy to rehearse for, not especially relevant for nailing down what a president would actually be like, and made no effort to nail them for their evasive or misleading answers.
See my above post for examples of far better questions and moderating of them.
EA, I/we can't change the game we all saw. The questions (for better or worse) were the questions. The moderation was the moderation. The game (at least as far as debate #1 goes is in the books - The clock reads zero)
For anyone who watched this debate (No matter what our personal political leanings/opinions are), I would suggest that, simply put, as far as Presidential debates go........ Romney absolutely hammered Obama from start to finish.
Just my take.
Peace, Ceeboo
Last edited by Guest on Thu Oct 04, 2012 1:36 pm, edited 2 times in total.
The public perception of the debate is that Romney won. This is driving he media coverage to enough of an extent that he probably will get a 1-3% bump in the polls for it over the next week or two. Given that he is only down 3-5% in the first place, this is excellent news if you are a Romney fan, which you apparently are. You don't seem to have the capacity to move past this celebration, but this horserace stuff should really be kept distinct from how awesome you think Romney was at articulating policy and overarching vision. On that front, Romney quite clearly was lies, self-contradiction with his own recent campaign, and platitudes. He basically "won" by being really aggressive and smirky about that. Lest you accuse me of bias, I don't think Obama on the other side was winning any kind of actual academic debate either. I'd think this is what you, obviously passionate about politics, would care more about.
So I'd think you'd get over your brief horserace high and be disappointed in the show of it all. It's absolutely absurd that this is the process we choose to pick our presidents.
The public perception of the debate is that Romney won. This is driving he media coverage to enough of an extent that he probably will get a 1-3% bump in the polls for it over the next week or two. Given that he is only down 3-5% in the first place, this is excellent news if you are a Romney fan, which you apparently are.
Incidentally, when Romney slides back to a very slight underdog as he likely will, I wonder if Scott Pierson thinks this will mean Romney is now secretly polling at a super-duper landslide favorite?
Is this debate proof positive that the fasts and prayers of members were answered?
“We look to not only the spiritual but also the temporal, and we believe that a person who is impoverished temporally cannot blossom spiritually.” Keith McMullin - Counsellor in Presiding Bishopric
"One, two, three...let's go shopping!" Thomas S Monson - Prophet, Seer, Revelator
How we "know" is by actually paying attention to the debate. You do realize that many American schools have Debate "Teams" which compete against each other....and win or lose these "debates"...you do know about that, right?
Seek freedom and become captive of your desires...seek discipline and find your liberty I can tell if a person is judgmental just by looking at them what is chaos to the fly is normal to the spider - morticia addams If you're not upsetting idiots, you might be an idiot. - Ted Nugent
How we "know" is by actually paying attention to the debate. You do realize that many American schools have Debate "Teams" which compete against each other....and win or lose these "debates"...you do know about that, right?
I'd heard that American youths were mass debaters...at least I think that's what I heard...
“We look to not only the spiritual but also the temporal, and we believe that a person who is impoverished temporally cannot blossom spiritually.” Keith McMullin - Counsellor in Presiding Bishopric
"One, two, three...let's go shopping!" Thomas S Monson - Prophet, Seer, Revelator