Joanna Brooks Watch

[_Lloyd Dobler]

This gift of a thread has reduced me to tears of laughter. They way this board plays out is second to none. The ball of silliness is deftly passed back and forth like professional infielders throwing the ball around the horn after a strike out. Eventually, the hilarity crescendos and the ball is passed back to the pitcher. My compliments to everyone for playing their positions so well. Still laughing and crying.

[_Cicero]

If you guys push poor Droopy to suicide I will be very upset.

Eh, was that supposed to be a joke? If so, it wasn't funny.

[_Kishkumen]

If you guys push poor Droopy to suicide I will be very upset.

Eh, was that supposed to be a joke? If so, it wasn't funny.

Eh, no, it wasn't. Is that supposed to be a joke?

I actually have something of a track record of trying to apply the brakes when I am concerned that ridicule is piling on a little too deeply.

So, again, no. It is not a joke.

[_Cicero]

I actually have something of a track record of trying to apply the brakes when I am concerned that ridicule is piling on a little too deeply.

So, again, no. It is not a joke.

Thanks for the clarification.

[_Gadianton]

I, for one, find Droopy's remarks to be quite compelling.

Indeed, criticism of the LDS Church qua LDS Church has risen from the grave like the undead while maintaining its mask of sincerity as those with an ax to grind bang their heads against the wall of their spiritual and emotional and philosophical and ideological shortcomings, seeking as they do to feed their vociferous appetites, notwithstanding that critics are all of a type who criticize apace while not being critics as such, despite the critical nature of their criticism, because the breath of their knowledge is barking up the wrong tree, and so they wish to split the baby (for those who recognize the illusion to Solomon), as they have rejected the plane and precious truths of the restored gospel, and are awash in a sea of cultural, moral, social, political, ethical, intellectual, and existential bankruptcy, which probably has something to do with Kinsey and Keynsianism and the 1960's hippie culture, notwithstanding the piece of mind that the gospel would offer to those who criticize it due to there criticism which is a kind of criticism that isn't but yet is of all things that are good and praiseworthy as a matter of coarse, critics and anti-Mormon socialist Nazi communist homosexual liberal leftists, which are more often than not one and the same, as they long ago lost cite of the principals of righteousness and the inspired council of the Bretheren to build castles in the air of their own folly which have finally come home to roost, but that dog won't hunt.

Thank you professor, you've really made me work to understand you here, reminding me of days of yore studying Fung Yu Lan, digesting the feast of intellectual seriousness he hunted, skinned, prepared, and served. I've made several intellectual connections between ideas, concepts, and analysis in an active, logically meaningful style that I've not been accustomed to as of late.

[_Droopy]

I think we all know the reason why. Droopy is scared of women.

Oh...you got me, Squishkumen. What penetrating, psychologically incisive analysis. How do you do it?

Any woman who dares to express her thoughts eloquently in the public eye send waves of terror down the overcooked-spaghetti spine of Droopy.

Which is exactly why I liked Jeanne Kirkpatrick's writing and speeches so much, and why I love to hear Laura Ingram masticate Leftist Morlocks like a piece of Dentyne. And those old Wu Sha movie swordswomen? Love 'em (Polly Shang Kuan could take 20 or 30 at a time, without mussing her hair)!

The only way he can deal with it is to engage in crazy cyberstalking.

Try to enjoy the daylight.

[_Drifting]

Droopster, shouldn't this thread be titled"

"Joanna Brooks Stalking"
or
"Obsessing About Joanna Brooks"
or
"Ten Days Away From An Injunction"

[_Elphaba]

I, for one, find Droopy's remarks to be quite compelling.

Indeed, criticism of the LDS Church qua LDS Church has risen from the grave like the undead while maintaining its mask of sincerity as those with an ax to grind bang their heads against the wall of their spiritual and emotional and philosophical and ideological shortcomings, seeking as they do to feed their vociferous appetites, notwithstanding that critics are all of a type who criticize apace while not being critics as such, despite the critical nature of their criticism, because the breath of their knowledge is barking up the wrong tree, and so they wish to split the baby (for those who recognize the illusion to Solomon), as they have rejected the plane and precious truths of the restored gospel, and are awash in a sea of cultural, moral, social, political, ethical, intellectual, and existential bankruptcy, which probably has something to do with Kinsey and Keynsianism and the 1960's hippie culture, notwithstanding the piece of mind that the gospel would offer to those who criticize it due to there criticism which is a kind of criticism that isn't but yet is of all things that are good and praiseworthy as a matter of coarse, critics and anti-Mormon socialist Nazi communist homosexual liberal leftists, which are more often than not one and the same, as they long ago lost cite of the principals of righteousness and the inspired council of the Bretheren to build castles in the air of their own folly which have finally come home to roost, but that dog won't hunt.

The other day I wrote a post suggesting Droopy might want to take a College Writing 101 course to learn the use of periods and paragraphs. I decided it was a waste of time and deleted it. But you can understand why I about peed my pants laughing at this.

A++++! (That's a better grade than droop ever got on his many theses.)

[_lulu]

I, for one, find Droopy's remarks to be quite compelling.

Indeed, criticism of the LDS Church qua LDS Church has risen from the grave like the undead while maintaining its mask of sincerity as those with an ax to grind bang their heads against the wall of their spiritual and emotional and philosophical and ideological shortcomings, seeking as they do to feed their vociferous appetites, notwithstanding that critics are all of a type who criticize apace while not being critics as such, despite the critical nature of their criticism, because the breath of their knowledge is barking up the wrong tree, and so they wish to split the baby (for those who recognize the illusion to Solomon), as they have rejected the plane and precious truths of the restored gospel, and are awash in a sea of cultural, moral, social, political, ethical, intellectual, and existential bankruptcy, which probably has something to do with Kinsey and Keynsianism and the 1960's hippie culture, notwithstanding the piece of mind that the gospel would offer to those who criticize it due to there criticism which is a kind of criticism that isn't but yet is of all things that are good and praiseworthy as a matter of coarse, critics and anti-Mormon socialist Nazi communist homosexual liberal leftists, which are more often than not one and the same, as they long ago lost cite of the principals of righteousness and the inspired council of the Bretheren to build castles in the air of their own folly which have finally come home to roost, but that dog won't hunt.

The other day I wrote a post suggesting Droopy might want to take a College Writing 101 course to learn the use of periods and paragraphs. I decided it was a waste of time and deleted it. But you can understand why I about peed my pants laughing at this.

A++++! (That's a better grade than droop ever got on his many theses.)

French philosphers don't use periods and paragraphs. Philistine.

[_Elphaba]

Philistine.

Ha! Well, at least I'm not the uncircumcised Philistine.