Hollywood cracks: Lindsay Lohan backs Romney

The Off-Topic forum for anything non-LDS related, such as sports or politics. Rated PG through PG-13.
_EAllusion
_Emeritus
Posts: 18519
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 12:39 pm

Re: Hollywood cracks: Lindsay Lohan backs Romney

Post by _EAllusion »

krose wrote:Right. According to the 538 blog, he's gone from an underwhelming 80% chance of winning (post-convention bump) back down to a miserable 66% chance, while Romney has gone from a very competitive 15% to an astoundingly awesome 33%.

That's some serious trouble.
Mittmentum!

Obama is in trouble. He's gone from extremely likely to slightly better than a coin flip. That's not good if you are an Obama fan.
_EAllusion
_Emeritus
Posts: 18519
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 12:39 pm

Re: Hollywood cracks: Lindsay Lohan backs Romney

Post by _EAllusion »

Drifting wrote: Then he would have to deliver what he said he would deliver,


No he doesn't. That's not even remotely possible in the case of Romney. Welcome to America. Are you new here?
_krose
_Emeritus
Posts: 2555
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 1:18 pm

Re: Hollywood cracks: Lindsay Lohan backs Romney

Post by _krose »

EAllusion wrote:
krose wrote:Right. According to the 538 blog, he's gone from an underwhelming 80% chance of winning (post-convention bump) back down to a miserable 66% chance, while Romney has gone from a very competitive 15% to an astoundingly awesome 33%.

That's some serious trouble.
Mittmentum!

Obama is in trouble. He's gone from extremely likely to slightly better than a coin flip. That's not good if you are an Obama fan.

You must be reading different polls than I am. 70/30 seems like more than a coin flip. It was pretty much inevitable that the convention bump would dissipate.
"The DNA of fictional populations appears to be the most susceptible to extinction." - Simon Southerton
_EAllusion
_Emeritus
Posts: 18519
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 12:39 pm

Re: Hollywood cracks: Lindsay Lohan backs Romney

Post by _EAllusion »

krose wrote:You must be reading different polls than I am. 70/30 seems like more than a coin flip. It was pretty much inevitable that the convention bump would dissipate.


1) Romney is up in the polls.

2) Broad prediction modeling has cautious modeling assumptions that are banking on reversion to the mean, and in some cases index/market forecasting supplements. It's not an extrapolation of today's polling snapshot.

3) Silver has it at about 65/35. That's slightly better than a coin flip, and there's no way you'd feel comfortable about there being a 35% chance of a highly undesirable outcome in another context. That is reasonably well covered under the term "trouble" when you consider Obama was now-casting at 98% not that long ago. My money would still be on Obama, but you shouldn't understate what's happened here like some nervous sports fan watching his team give up a good lead.

4) Romney's gains aren't primarily a consequence of Obama's convention bounce dissipating. They are a consequence of a sustained, highly favorable media cycle regarding being painted as a huge victor in the first debate.
Post Reply