Did Anyone Bother to Notice.....???

[_sock puppet]

Does Scratch's swipe break Universal Rule (number 7) or not?

No, it does not thanks to your quote above.

Well played.

H.

Touché, H., you played Pahoran well.

[_Quasimodo]

Quasi! (Long time no type! Good to her from you, friend)

Peace,
Ceeboo

I always enjoy chatting with you too, my friend! I've been too busy lately. I'm finding it hard to keep up with the board. It's easing off a little right now. Expect more of me than you would like.

[_Ceeboo]

Quasi! (Long time no type! Good to her from you, friend)

Peace,
Ceeboo

I always enjoy chatting with you, too, my friend! I've been too busy lately. I'm finding it hard to keep up with the board. It's easing off a little right now. Expect more of me than you would like.

Huh?
In my above quote, I said "good to her from you, friend."

I guess I oughta thank you for sending me this female, yes?

Well, I thank you, Quasi. (Much appreciated)

Peace,
Ceeboo

[_Pahoran]

You forgot one:

Is Pahoran an ass who castigates others for their anonymity?

H.

PS. Why, yes, Pahoran IS an ass who castigates others for their anonymity.

CFR, please. Where and when have I castigated anyone for their anonymity?

Regards,
Pahoran

[_Quasimodo]

Huh?
In my above quote, I said "good to her from you, friend."

I guess I oughta thank you for sending me this female, yes?

Well, I thank you, Quasi. (Much appreciated)

Peace,
Ceeboo

No worries, Ceeboo. What's a typo between friends? Besides, I'm too hairy to be confused with a 'her'.

[_Kishkumen]

I think you screwed up, Liz, but I have some sympathy for your reasoning.

Scratch pulls no punches. It is sorely tempting to cross the line when you tangle with him.

I am tired of this whole lotta nothing, though. I say we all just move on.

[_Pahoran]

Is Pahoran a registered poster here?

Yes.

Is Pahoran's divorce in real life information about Pahoran?

Yes.

Did Pahoran publicise his divorce here?

Yes. In the above quoted statement, you have acknowledged your divorce, publicly, on this board.

Either you are lying, as you habitually do, or you do not understand plain English. Which is it?

Referring to a subject someone else has raised, without affirming or denying it, makes no "acknowledgement" of its verity.

It is now fair game, and is retroactively fair game as per the 'stemelbow' ruling of a few months ago.

Even if we take the utterly amoral view that you rely upon to justify the institutional hypocrisy of this sty, the fact is that I had not said anything about any divorce, if indeed I ever had one, before the worthless Scratch tried to taunt me with it. Thus, if that "Universal Rule" means anything at all, he broke it.

Does Scratch's swipe break Universal Rule (number 7) or not?

No, it does not thanks to your quote above.

I suggest you take another look at my quote above.

So you are saying that if the worthless Scratch ever decides to stop using his anonymity as a shield for his ongoing vendetta against Dan Peterson, and come clean about his identity, Liz's post will retroactively be hunky-dory?

Well played.

Regards,
Pahoran

[_Ceeboo]

Besides, I'm too hairy to be confused with a 'her'.

CFR

Peace,
Ceeboo

[_Morley]

You forgot one:

Is Pahoran an ass who castigates others for their anonymity?

H.

PS. Why, yes, Pahoran IS an ass who castigates others for their anonymity.

CFR, please. Where and when have I castigated anyone for their anonymity?

Regards,
Pahoran

http://mormondiscussions.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?p=641121#p641121

[_Quasimodo]

Besides, I'm too hairy to be confused with a 'her'.

CFR

Peace,
Ceeboo

A temporary change in avatars. That should convince you!