Did Anyone Bother to Notice.....???

[_sock puppet]

You see, I keep coming back to this question: if indeed my information about the worthless Scratch is so far out in left field,

'so far out in left field'? No. Just wrong, baseless and misleading--misleading to liz, who trusted you, and you were using her, knowing you could push her disdain-for-Scratch button.

then why is he, and why are all his most loyal enablers, so mad about it?

Regards,
Pahoran

That you would attempt to violate a board rule that you yourself had invoked whenever anyone used your in real life name, that was already broadly known? Yes, calling you on your hypocrisy certainly renders us 'so mad'.

That you were wrong only makes your predicament humorous to onlookers. That you thought you had the 'goods' on Scratch and started, for all you knew, violating a rule--a rule you yourself had sought refuge under--demonstrates how hollow your Mormon morality is.

[_sock puppet]

Don't you feel any compunction for having betrayed the trust that liz placed in you?

And how do you think I "betrayed" her, Charlie Horse?

Oh, this is going to be fun.

Regards,
Pahoran

You led liz to believe you knew the in real life identity of Dr Scratch, when you hadn't done the due diligence to vet your hunch before passing it off onto liz.

Do you ever do your homework first, or do you always go off half-cocked?

[_sock puppet]

@Pahoran

And it takes someone as foul as you to have entangled liz in the web of your lies.

You see lamb chop, this is where you demonstrate just how enraged you are that I dared to defy your buddy. You have no valid reason to even imagine that I told anyone any lies, but you are lashing out in anger.

Just like your putzi did on another thread.

Funny, that.

Regards,
Pahoran

'Valid reasons'? From you, P? Have you no ability to sense when you are stepping into a pile of your own feces?

[_Pahoran]

You see, I keep coming back to this question: if indeed my information about the worthless Scratch is so far out in left field,

'so far out in left field'? No. Just wrong, baseless and misleading--misleading to liz, who trusted you, and you were using her, knowing you could push her disdain-for-Scratch button.

I regret that you have no good faith basis on which to claim to believe what you assert.

then why is he, and why are all his most loyal enablers, so mad about it?

Regards,
Pahoran

That you would attempt to violate a board rule that you yourself had invoked whenever anyone used your in real life name, that was already broadly known? Yes, calling you on your hypocrisy certainly renders us 'so mad'.

There are a number of behaviours that demonstrate how mad you all are. Shall I enumerate them?

That you were wrong only makes your predicament humorous to onlookers. That you thought you had the 'goods' on Scratch and started, for all you knew, violating a rule--a rule you yourself had sought refuge under--demonstrates how hollow your Mormon morality is.

But here's the thing, Charlie Horse: it only violated a rule if other people knew what I was talking about. That's how those kinds of hints work, you see -- only those privy to the information would get them.

Scratch got the very first one -- the most obscure of the lot.

Funny, that.

Regards,
Pahoran

[_Pahoran]

You led liz to believe you knew the in real life identity of Dr Scratch, when you hadn't done the due diligence to vet your hunch before passing it off onto liz.

Are you claiming to be privy to the correspondence between myself and Liz?

Or are you just making stuff up out of whole cloth, as you usually do?

Do you ever do your homework first, or do you always go off half-cocked?

Hey, at least I don't just confidently assert stuff I have absolutely no reason to believe.

Regards,
Pahoran

[_Kishkumen]

Hey, at least I don't just confidently assert stuff I have absolutely no reason to believe.

Regards,
Pahoran

No, you just arrogantly assert things that you have supremely crappy reasons to believe. And you know it, because you refuse to share them out of sheer embarrassment that you will look as stupid as you acted.

[_Pahoran]

Hey, at least I don't just confidently assert stuff I have absolutely no reason to believe.

Regards,
Pahoran

No, you just arrogantly assert things that you have supremely crappy reasons to believe. And you know it, because you refuse to share them out of sheer embarrassment that you will look as stupid as you acted.

Ah. Another failed mind-reader.

I don't disclose my sources because my sources asked me not to. Simple as that.

It's called "keeping a promise." You might like to try it sometime.

Regards,
Pahoran

[_sock puppet]

You led liz to believe you knew the in real life identity of Dr Scratch, when you hadn't done the due diligence to vet your hunch before passing it off onto liz.

Are you claiming to be privy to the correspondence between myself and Liz?

Or are you just making stuff up out of whole cloth, as you usually do?

Do you ever do your homework first, or do you always go off half-cocked?

Hey, at least I don't just confidently assert stuff I have absolutely no reason to believe.

Regards,
Pahoran

Did you do your due diligence, P?

Prove to us that you did?

[_sock puppet]

Hey, at least I don't just confidently assert stuff I have absolutely no reason to believe.

Regards,
Pahoran

No, you just arrogantly assert things that you have supremely crappy reasons to believe. And you know it, because you refuse to share them out of sheer embarrassment that you will look as stupid as you acted.

Ah. Another failed mind-reader.

I don't disclose my sources because my sources asked me not to. Simple as that.

It's called "keeping a promise." You might like to try it sometime.

Regards,
Pahoran

Whoa! there big boy. You think you need to keep confidential the identity of your source of information, information that was itself to be used to 'out' the identity of someone else? Does your hypocrisy have no end?

[_Kishkumen]

Ah. Another failed mind-reader.

I don't disclose my sources because my sources asked me not to. Simple as that.

The voices in your head don't count. And, frankly, I don't give a crap who your source was. Your source blew it. And you were all stupid to buy into such obviously bogus nonsense without checking the validity of the information more carefully.

The dumbest decision of all was Daniel leveling the accusation in public.

It's called "keeping a promise." You might like to try it sometime.

Regards,
Pahoran

I keep the promises that are worth keeping, not the ones that require me to turn a blind eye to thugs like you.