Pahoran: Make your case for libel against DCP or shut up

[_Chap]

I'm pretty sure Thunderchops posted under a different handle at ZLMB.

Bump for Scratch. What was that handle?

Or don't you want anyone to be able to check up on the accusation?

Is that because you know it won't withstand scrutiny?

Regards,
Pahoran

Start another thread Pahoran, if you find that question so fascinating.

You are wildly off the topic of this thread, which is:

Pahoran: Make your case for libel against DCP or shut up.

[_Pahoran]

Bump for Pahoran.

What's your case for libel against DCP? (See the OP)

I'm not interested in that discussion. And in any ostensibly "free speech" forum, I am free to ignore it.

However, Scratch was the one who defamed me by repeating the false "Thunderchops" accusation. I'm entitled to run it to ground.

So I'm going to.

And if the worthless Scratch doesn't want to make it possible to check up on the source of the accusation, I know what conclusion to draw from that.

Regards,
Pahoran

[_sock puppet]

Bump for Pahoran.

What's your case for libel against DCP? (See the OP)

I'm not interested in that discussion. And in any ostensibly "free speech" forum, I am free to ignore it.

However, Scratch was the one who defamed me by repeating the false "Thunderchops" accusation. I'm entitled to run it to ground.

So I'm going to.

And if the worthless Scratch doesn't want to make it possible to check up on the source of the accusation, I know what conclusion to draw from that.

Regards,
Pahoran

Bump for Pahoran.

What's your case for libel against DCP? (See the OP)

[_Pahoran]

Start another thread Pahoran, if you find that question so fascinating.

The worthless Scratch, following his buddy the hateful Graham repeated that baseless accusation in this thread. Why is it that your fellow haters can introduce any accusations they like, but the thread is only derailed when I respond?

Could it be that double standards are what this place runs on?

Why yes; it could.

You are wildly off the topic of this thread, which is:

Pahoran: Make your case for libel against DCP or shut up.

I don't care.

And there's no need to shout, Chappie.

Regards,
Pahoran

[_Pahoran]

Bump for Pahoran.

What's your case for libel against DCP? (See the OP)

Clearly you want the worthless Scratch's defamatory bit of gossip to go unquestioned as well.

Tough luck.

I don't care about the arrogant Darth's pointless demand. And I'm going to keep on ignoring it.

You have your answer. Kindly cease and desist from harassing me.

Regards,
Pahoran

[_sock puppet]

Bump for Pahoran.

What's your case for libel against DCP? (See the OP)

I'm not interested in that discussion. And in any ostensibly "free speech" forum, I am free to ignore it.

However, Scratch was the one who defamed me by repeating the false "Thunderchops" accusation. I'm entitled to run it to ground.

So I'm going to.

And if the worthless Scratch doesn't want to make it possible to check up on the source of the accusation, I know what conclusion to draw from that.

Regards,
Pahoran

So you're admitting to hijacking this thread.

Rule #4 Do not "derail" threads or otherwise insert commentary that has nothing to do with a thread's opening post.

[_Pahoran]

So you're admitting to hijacking this thread.

Rule #4 Do not "derail" threads or otherwise insert commentary that has nothing to do with a thread's opening post.

No, I'm not.

As I said above: The worthless Scratch, following his buddy the hateful Graham, repeated that baseless accusation in this thread. Why is it that your fellow haters can introduce any accusations they like, but the thread is only derailed when I respond?

Could it be that double standards are what this place runs on?

Why yes; it could.

I'm not at all interested in Darth's harassment. If the fact that I'm not going to respond to the OP means that the thread is "hijacked," then the mods can close it.

Regards,
Pahoran

[_Chap]

...
I'm not at all interested in Darth's harassment. If the fact that I'm not going to respond to the OP means that the thread is "hijacked," then the mods can close it.

Regards,
Pahoran

Pahoran seems to think he is on a quite different board.

[_Pahoran]

...
I'm not at all interested in Darth's harassment. If the fact that I'm not going to respond to the OP means that the thread is "hijacked," then the mods can close it.

Regards,
Pahoran

Pahoran seems to think he is on a quite different board.

What, mods can't close threads here?

Regards,
Pahoran

[_Chap]

...

What, mods can't close threads here?

Regards,
Pahoran

I have never seen it done, though no doubt the software would allow them to do it. If it has happened, it is so rare an event that most posters would be as surprised as I would be to see it occur in the near future.

I have seen one post that was blocked from further posts, but that was an announcement about a former poster in deep personal trouble, put up by the board administrator, and was clearly a highly unusual case.

I am glad it does not happen here, unlike on the MADboard, where thread closures often seem to have no very obvious rational motive.

Oh yes, and:

10: PRINT "Pahoran: Make your case for libel against DCP or shut up."

20: GOTO 10