Obama's Election Seals Our Fate

[_Droopy]

Obama's Election Seals Our Fate
By Monty Pelerin

The Obama re-election dooms the country. It ensures that his philosophy will be imposed for another four years.

His election ensures the continuing shift away from the Rule of Law, property rights, free men, and free markets. Obama's vision of how the world works ensures a dire economy until an economic collapse resets everything. The rest of the world, apparently bigger Obama supporters than U.S. voters, will not be immune from the consequences.

The Fundamentals of Progress

Peace and progress are the children of freedom. The wealth of nations was explained more than two hundred years ago by Adam Smith. Property rights and markets coordinate behavior in a manner that all are made better off by the pursuit of self-interest.

President Obama's view of the world is in contradiction to anything that has ever succeeded. He believes that elites should manage and direct people's lives. This fatal conceit, as Friedrich Hayek referred to it, produces failure and misery wherever it is tried.

Ludwig von Mises pointed out that the progress of the West was achieved on a simple idea:

The essential characteristic of Western civilization that distinguishes it from the arrested and petrified civilizations of the East was and is its concern for freedom from the state.

Civilization advanced and prospered on a foundation of private property, defined rights, free men, free markets, and the Rule of Law. Obama's view is hostile to these pillars of progress despite the lack of evidence of progress for any country that has not adhered to these principles.

There is no evidence of any country which has abandoned these principles ever being able to return to them without major upheaval. Mises observed:

Political ideas that have dominated the public mind for decades cannot be refuted through rational arguments. They must run their course in life and cannot collapse otherwise than in great catastrophe...

The recent election was a prime example of how ratiocination cannot combat ideology. The masses are unable or unwilling to process complex argument in logical fashion. As a result, we reelected a man who does not believe in American values or the principles necessary for progress and well-being. His re-election occurred despite the worst record of domestic and foreign policy outcomes of anyone in the last seven decades.

Where We Are Headed

The United States and Europe have abandoned the fundamentals necessary for progress. Both are hopelessly committed to the failed ideas of Socialism. Both are headed for great catastrophe. The catastrophe extends beyond economic well-being and touches the foundations of society and civilization itself.

We are headed into an economic dark age, where standards of living will continue to decline and may collapse. Societies and civilizations will also regress.

Voluntary cooperation is being replaced by coercion and division. Segments of society are set off against each other. Civilization is regressing toward a Hobbesian outcome:

Whatsoever therefore is consequent to a time of Warre, where every man is Enemy to every man; the same is consequent to the time, wherein men live without other security, than what their own strength, and their own invention shall furnish them withall. In such condition, there is no place for Industry; because the fruit thereof is uncertain; and consequently no Culture of the Earth; no Navigation, nor use of the commodities that may be imported by Sea; no commodious Building; no Instruments of moving, and removing such things as require much force; no Knowledge of the face of the Earth; no account of Time; no Arts; no Letters; no Society; and which is worst of all, continuall feare, and danger of violent death; And the life of man, solitary, poore, nasty, brutish, and short.

Western civilization, once the shining city on the hill, has been tarnished. Western countries have abandoned the principles that made them great and have lost much of their luster. The world may soon be without this beacon of freedom and success.

The Meaning of Obama's Election

Regarding the specifics of Obama's reelection, these comments from a perceptive reader, Syrin, are reasonable:

Here's what this means in my opinion:

1) Obamacare will be fully implemented
2) Biggest tax increase in the history of the world will come January
3) Supreme Court will now be fully liberal
4) We will surrender more of our rights to the UN - guns will be removed
5) The end of the US as we ever knew it
That last one is not hyperbole. I still think the election was stolen as I predicted a 5-10 voter fraud margin, and this is indeed the difference, but why would I make that last point? Here's why. The gov't will increase IMMENSELY the next four years. Gov't employees, union members and welfare dependents will be the BIGGEST VOTING FACTION from now until the end of the US society. We turned into England over night and we will never be able to go back. Exit polls showed overwhelming displeasure with Obamacare and they voted for him anyway. We cannot recover from this.

CONSERVATISM AS AN IDEOLOGY IS OVER IN AMERICA ! We are now officially the land of the dependent, jealous and greedy. Punishing success will be codified. No one will go into medicine or any field that takes a lot of time, money sweat and effort to achieve because work and success will no longer be rewarded.
I am serious when I say I will be stunned if the economic collapse doesn't happen in under two years. This isn't just an emotional reaction to a loss. These were my thoughts before we knew the results.
Make your peace with your family and prepare.

Where Does This Go?

The mathematics of the debt situation were intractable before the election. Someone truly committed to solving this problem would likely fail because the debt burden has become so large. That assumption will not be tested, because the man elected has no intention of dealing with the issue.

A collapse is now inevitable. Spending will not shrink. Deficits will rise. Taxes will rise. Economic activity will fall. The debt death spiral will strangle economic activity, and ultimately the economy will implode. Societies themselves will likely be sucked into the abyss.

Obama had no viable economic plan for the last four years, and he is still without one. There has been no progress economically. Instead, we are $5 trillion worse off, with nothing to show for it. His spending will continue for the next four years. It is all that he knows.

This election accelerated our spiral toward collapse. Higher spending and more Federal Reserve money-creation will not alter the destination. We are now on the superhighway to ruin. The destination is known; only the estimated time of arrival is not.

Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/11/ ... z2BgYpIfny


http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/11/ ... _fate.html

[_Jason Bourne]

Really? Seals our fate? This is as much BS as Beastie's thread that the Republicans ran a race baiting campaign.

Extremists are really getting tiresome.

[_krose]

"American Thinker."

Judging by its content, this may well be the most amusing name for a site ever.

[_EAllusion]

Really? Seals our fate? This is as much BS as Beastie's thread that the Republicans ran a race baiting campaign.

Extremists are really getting tiresome.

Republicans did run a race baiting campaign. If you don't understand why harping on "Food Stamp president" is meant to carry a racially charged undertone, you are being obtuse. You should read more ajax posts to understand why that is a racial dog whistle. To compare that to Droopy saying Obama's reelection means we'll have to surrender our guns and rights to the UN is absurd.

[_EAllusion]

The bizarre thing about this kind of conservative chicken littlism is that Obama is a moderate politician who is center-right on a boatload of issues they care about. He's closest presidential analogs are Nixon and GWB, not FDR or LBJ.

[_cinepro]

I know I'm pretty bummed about how Tuesday went (more for California than for Obama), but I know I can't be more bummed than Democrats were in 2004, 1984 and 1972, and Republicans were in 1996 and 1964.

And there is probably nothing that can compare to how Democrats felt in 2000. I can't imagine how traumatizing that must have been! (Honestly, I didn't like Bush and voted third party, so I didn't even really care how the recount worked out.)

So set aside all this doomsday talk. The Republicans will learn their lesson and adapt, they'll eventually find the right candidates and things will cycle back and it will be the Democrats feeling angst about the end of the world. Hopefully quickly.

[_bcspace]

Watching Obama's victory speech, I was reminded of this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V1FFVWEQnSM

While I agree with the article in the OP, one always has to look on the bright side. Since Obama's numbers are down from 2008, the electorate is still up for grabs. If John Boehner gets some balls (or someone else is chosen to lead who already has some) and we maintain a steady drumbeat of our own in the culture war, we can hold the line in 2014 and pull ourselves up by the bootstraps in 2016.

It's time to reload. This time with better ammo.

[_beastie]

Really? Seals our fate? This is as much BS as Beastie's thread that the Republicans ran a race baiting campaign.

Extremists are really getting tiresome.

Republicans did run a race baiting campaign. If you don't understand why harping on "Food Stamp president" is meant to carry a racially charged undertone, you are being obtuse. You should read more ajax posts to understand why that is a racial dog whistle. To compare that to Droopy saying Obama's reelection means we'll have to surrender our guns and rights to the UN is absurd.

Thank you!

[_Brackite]

Really? Seals our fate? This is as much BS as Beastie's thread that the Republicans ran a race baiting campaign.

Extremists are really getting tiresome.

Republicans did run a race baiting campaign. If you don't understand why harping on "Food Stamp president" is meant to carry a racially charged undertone, you are being obtuse. You should read more ajax posts to understand why that is a racial dog whistle. To compare that to Droopy saying Obama's reelection means we'll have to surrender our guns and rights to the UN is absurd.

It was Newt Gingrich who called Obama the "Food Stamp president", Not Mitt Romney.

[_beastie]

It was Newt Gingrich who called Obama the "Food Stamp president", Not Mitt Romney.

Romney used Gingrich as a surrogate. If Romney had wanted Gingrich to avoid race-baiting, he would have conveyed that to him.