FHA Needs a Bailout

The Off-Topic forum for anything non-LDS related, such as sports or politics. Rated PG through PG-13.
Post Reply
_cinepro
_Emeritus
Posts: 4502
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 10:15 pm

FHA Needs a Bailout

Post by _cinepro »

Can someone explain to me how it's a good thing for the taxpayers to be on the hook for loans that are made to people who probably won't be able to repay them?

The FHA guarantees mortgages on loans made by FHA-approved lenders throughout the United States and insures mortgages on single-family homes. Traditionally, it has participated in a fairly small segment of the overall mortgage market. In 2006, the FHA’s market share was just 5 percent. But as credit availability tightened and underwriting standards became more exacting, the FHA’s share of the market exploded to 30 percent of all new mortgage loans. Why is this significant to taxpayers? Unlike the case with conventional loans, when an FHA borrower defaults on his mortgage, the American taxpayers have insured 100 percent of the value of the loan and will be forced to cover any losses on it.

The FHA’s increased market share has not been a good thing for taxpayers. One-sixth of all FHA loans were delinquent as of August 2012. This translates to over 1.2 million borrowers who have missed at least one payment. Even more ominously, 58 percent of the delinquent loans were “seriously delinquent,” which means that almost 10 percent of all FHA borrowers had missed three consecutive months of payments or are now in foreclosure.

http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/ ... dan-murphy


Yay for the government using taxpayer money to try and prop up the housing market!
_Eric

Re: FHA Needs a Bailout

Post by _Eric »

cinepro wrote:Can someone explain to me how it's a good thing for the taxpayers to be on the hook for loans that are made to people who probably won't be able to repay them?


It's simple: growth is better than value destruction.


Yay for the government using taxpayer money to try and prop up the housing market!


lol. You're losing it dude.

Image
_cinepro
_Emeritus
Posts: 4502
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 10:15 pm

Re: FHA Needs a Bailout

Post by _cinepro »

Eric wrote:It's simple: growth is better than value destruction.


So the government guarantees a loan to someone, and when they can't pay it back, the government then takes money from the taxpayers and reimburses the lender. And that's "growth".

The economy, like God, truly works in mysterious ways.

But I hope you're right, because if that truly is "growth", our economy is really going to take off in the next few years.
_subgenius
_Emeritus
Posts: 13326
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 12:50 pm

Re: FHA Needs a Bailout

Post by _subgenius »

Eric wrote:
cinepro wrote:Can someone explain to me how it's a good thing for the taxpayers to be on the hook for loans that are made to people who probably won't be able to repay them?


It's simple: growth is better than value destruction.

true, but "growth" is not what is resulting....typical lack of common sense from you guys
try again
Seek freedom and become captive of your desires...seek discipline and find your liberty
I can tell if a person is judgmental just by looking at them
what is chaos to the fly is normal to the spider - morticia addams
If you're not upsetting idiots, you might be an idiot. - Ted Nugent
Post Reply