Regarding moderation and censorship

[_LDSToronto]

Dear Shades,
What about male nipples?
Need clarification.

All I know is if those fighting for ludwigm's freedom have hindered zeezrom's super fine art posting past ... and that he will now be censored based on their need to set that law, that they might push it's boundaries, they have done MDB a disservice.

I agree. The mods have done MDB a great disservice. Shame on all of you.

H.

[_LDSToronto]

Dear Shades,
What about male nipples?
Need clarification.

All I know is if those fighting for ludwigm's freedom have hindered zeezrom's super fine art posting past ... and that he will now be censored based on their need to set that law, that they might push it's boundaries, they have done MDB a disservice.

It's wonderful to see the mods punishing the innocent. Ludwig, zeezrom. Hey, why don't you guys line up and kick Ceeboo in the nuts while you are at it?

H.

[_Chap]

What about a female penis? Or a man with only one penis?

These are topics that, if I wished to discuss them, would be better pursued on boards devoted to other topics.

I am frankly bored nigh to death will all this stuff. I suppose it just shows that the Mormon front is pretty quiet at the moment, and that there is not a lot else to talk about.

And, by the way, I really do find it very hard indeed to think of a topic to do with Mormonism that could only properly be discussed in the context of the kind of illustration that people are so busy tormenting Shades about.

[_LDSToronto]

What about a female penis? Or a man with only one penis?

These are topics that, if I wished to discuss them, would be better pursued on boards devoted to other topics.

I am frankly bored nigh to death will all this stuff. I suppose it just shows that the Mormon front is pretty quiet at the moment, and that there is not a lot else to talk about.

And, by the way, I really do find it very hard indeed to think of a topic to do with Mormonism that could only properly be discussed in the context of the kind of illustration that people are so busy tormenting Shades about.

Are hermaphrodites God's children? Can a hermaphrodite hold the priesthood? That took me two seconds. I could think of a whole bunch of other topics if I put my mind to it.

[_MCB]

that could only properly be discussed in the context of the kind of illustration that people are so busy tormenting Shades about.

Lets see if my attempt flies.

[_Tarski]

Are hermaphrodites God's children? Can a hermaphrodite hold the priesthood? That took me two seconds. I could think of a whole bunch of other topics if I put my mind to it.

and I am sure you will need some pictures to discuss that right?


Of course it has already been discussed.


Let me know when you plan to post pics of microbikinis and shaved mons pubis so I can arrange for the dean of the college to tell me if she thinks it workplace safe. lol

[_LDSToronto]

Are hermaphrodites God's children? Can a hermaphrodite hold the priesthood? That took me two seconds. I could think of a whole bunch of other topics if I put my mind to it.

and I am sure you will need some pictures to discuss that right?

Perhaps. I don't really plan these things, but it's good to know what the law is before I post.

Let me know when you plan to post pics of microbikinis and shaved mons pubis so I can arrange for the dean of the college to tell me if she thinks it workplace safe. lol

Smart people would normally check their workplace IT policy to determine what is safe viewing. Does your college dean approve of everything *written* in the Terrestrial, or might she take pause?

H.

[_RockSlider]

It's wonderful to see the mods punishing the innocent. Ludwig, zeezrom. Hey, why don't you guys line up and kick Ceeboo in the nuts while you are at it?

I've followed this free Ludwigm ordeal for long before I was a mod. It's my observation that NO moderator intervention has taken place until Stormy has tried to deal with your recent push the limits thread.

This has been on ongoing battle between a few and the administrator of this board. Its also my observation that the administrator of this board has had a very long history of privately dealing with Ludwigm.

Shades had effectively dealt with Ludwigm, a singular poster for a long time before the "free Ludwigm" campaign began.

No it was not the moderators that have led to this need for the law. Its a few that disrespected the administrators previous actions against Ludwigm and would not let up on their attack against shades.

[_ludwigm]

Isaiah 28:16.Therefore thus saith the Lord GOD, Behold, I lay in Zion for a foundation a stone, a tried stone, a precious corner stone, a sure foundation: he that believeth shall not make haste.

Zechariah 10:4. Out of him came forth the corner, out of him the nail, out of him the battle bow, out of him every oppressor together.

Matthew 21:42.Jesus saith unto them, Did ye never read in the scriptures, The stone which the builders rejected, the same is become the head of the corner: this is the Lord's doing, and it is marvellous in our eyes?

Mark 12:10. And have ye not read this scripture; The stone which the builders rejected is become the head of the corner

[_Tarski]

Smart people would normally check their workplace IT policy to determine what is safe viewing. Does your college dean approve of everything *written* in the Terrestrial, or might she take pause?

H.

I don't visit the terrestrial while at work. That's the whole point of the separation isn't it?

added: OK I checked the IT policy. No mention of microbikinis.