Gay Parents: 11 x more likely to molest and other "goodies"

[_LittleNipper]

It is most obvious that when a (Roman Catholic) priest molested children, he was molesting boys. When the Boy Scout leader molested children, he was molesting boys. It seems to me that homosexuality is very evil and those that are trying to make it acceptable are either very niave or want to cover up the evil by making male with male and female with female contact appear as normal. However, one doesn't treat a cancer by saying such an affliction is a healty process and lets just accept it as that. No, the cancer is treated so that the individual might lead a long normal life.

[_lulu]

It is most obvious that when a (Roman Catholic) priest molested children, he was molesting boys.

Its your position that no Roman Catholic priest has never molested a girl?

[_Darth J]

It is most obvious that when a (Roman Catholic) priest molested children, he was molesting boys.

Its your position that no Roman Catholic priest has never molested a girl?

http://www.snapnetwork.org/female_victi ... _index.htm

I think this is a valid argument against opposite-sex marriage, by the way. Some adults molest children of the opposite sex. Therefore, heterosexual couples should not be allowed to marry.

[_LittleNipper]

It is most obvious that when a (Roman Catholic) priest molested children, he was molesting boys.

Its your position that no Roman Catholic priest has never molested a girl?

No, It is my position that the vast majority of sexual contacts are between homosexual priests and boys.

[_LittleNipper]

[
Its your position that no Roman Catholic priest has never molested a girl?

http://www.snapnetwork.org/female_victi ... _index.htm

I think this is a valid argument against opposite-sex marriage, by the way. Some adults molest children of the opposite sex. Therefore, heterosexual couples should not be allowed to marry.

You're a sick minded person, but so are all sinners. The difference is that you think you are totally fine and dandy and anyone who disagrees with you is morally inferior to you. Marriage is for the primary purpose of raising a family. As homosexual unions have never produced a single child, to bless such a union is unthinkable if not totally without merit as is their coupling.

[_palerobber]

Its your position that no Roman Catholic priest has never molested a girl?

No, It is my position that the vast majority of sexual contacts are between homosexual priests and boys.

what do you imagine is the ratio of gay to straight among catholic priests in the western world?

[_Darth J]

http://www.snapnetwork.org/female_victi ... _index.htm

I think this is a valid argument against opposite-sex marriage, by the way. Some adults molest children of the opposite sex. Therefore, heterosexual couples should not be allowed to marry.

You're a sick minded person,

Clearly. A healthy individual would only object to same-sex child molestation, rather than objecting to child molestation in general.

but so are all sinners.

I had pulled pork for dinner tonight. And the other day I gave a hug to a female who was probably menstruating, and I also wore linen pants with a wool sweater. My sins are totally out of control.

The difference is that you think you are totally fine and dandy and anyone who disagrees with you is morally inferior to you.

No, I'm not being touchy-feely. I'm saying you make astoundingly bad arguments that tend to be based entirely on your interpretation of the tribal mythology of the ancient Hebrews.

Marriage is for the primary purpose of raising a family.

Good. I look forward to you showing me a jurisdiction in the United States where that is the case.

As homosexual unions have never produced a single child, to bless such a union is unthinkable if not totally without merit as is their coupling.

As are the legally valid marriages between infertile couples, marriages to women who are past menopause, marriages where the husband has had a vasectomy and/or the wife has had a tubal ligation, and marriages in which the spouses simply decide not to have any children.

[_lulu]

It is most obvious that when a (Roman Catholic) priest molested children, he was molesting boys.

Its your position that no Roman Catholic priest has never molested a girl?

No, It is my position that the vast majority of sexual contacts are between homosexual priests and boys.

But that isn't what you said.