Another Perspective

The Off-Topic forum for anything non-LDS related, such as sports or politics. Rated PG through PG-13.
_Molok
_Emeritus
Posts: 1832
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2010 4:31 am

Re: Another Perspective

Post by _Molok »

In the seventies, screaming hard rock was in fashion among young whites, while sweet, sinuous funk and soul ruled the black airwaves—a difference I was proud of. But in the eighties, rock quieted down, and black music became the assault on the ears and soul.


Rock quieted down in the eighties?
_zeezrom
_Emeritus
Posts: 11938
Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2009 8:57 pm

Re: Another Perspective

Post by _zeezrom »

Molok wrote:
Rock quieted down in the eighties?

I'm only coming in here to say to Molok - I was talking about all these damn political threads in the Off-topic. I wasn't directing any criticism at you. I can't keep them at bay with my threads. They are too overwhelming. :(
Oh for shame, how the mortals put the blame on us gods, for they say evils come from us, but it is they, rather, who by their own recklessness win sorrow beyond what is given... Zeus (1178 BC)

The Holy Sacrament.
_Molok
_Emeritus
Posts: 1832
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2010 4:31 am

Re: Another Perspective

Post by _Molok »

zeezrom wrote:I'm only coming in here to say to Molok - I was talking about all these damn political threads in the Off-topic. I wasn't directing any criticism at you. I can't keep them at bay with my threads. They are too overwhelming. :(

Hey Zee,

I actually read your response on the other thread, I thought I had responded to you there, but apparently I'm up in the night on that one. Thanks for taking the effort of hunting me down, though, you're one of the good ones ;)
_Droopy
_Emeritus
Posts: 9826
Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 4:06 pm

Re: Another Perspective

Post by _Droopy »

quote="Droopy" First, according to EA and Beastie (and most on the Left), its poverty that produces gangsta rap, Hip-Hop culture, and underclass values, Hip-Hop being the authentic voice and expression of that experience. Next, its rampant materialism and capitalist "lust." Why then, I wonder, doesn't Bill Gates dress like Tupac Shakur?)


I said no such thing. Feel free to quote otherwise.

I did say, "Country music is similar to hip hop in that it is heavily influenced and consumed by people touched by poverty."


Here's the entire quote:

Country music is similar to hip hop in that it is heavily influenced and consumed by people touched by poverty. That's why those themes come up a lot.



You responded with, "Its also heavily influenced and consumed by people touched by vast wealth and fame, and is consumed heavily by both white and black middle class youth."

Then you point out:


... those musical culture's relationship with poverty helps explain the content. People write what they know."


Why did no antinomian, anti-civilizational thug culture glorifying criminality, drug use, macho posing, misogyny, predatory, adventuristic male sexuality, and gang membership originate among the Oakies or among the vast numbers of unemployed blue collar workers of the Depression era?

Why did the underclass thug culture only appear among blacks themselves during the 70s and 80s, and why was it overwhelmingly absent among American blacks from the early 60s and back to the early part of the 20th century, when blacks were, as a group, not only much poorer but legitimately oppressed as a racial minority?

Meanwhile, while attempting to pillory me for saying that the content of hip-hop is influenced by the experience of poverty, you go on to approvingly quote an essay written by a black cultural critic that says, "Hip-hop is not just a style of music. It is a culture borne of poor, inner-city life in America that has evolved into the rallying cry of those unable to negotiate the nuances of the mainstream."


And that' s the key difference. Hip-Hop was born in the inner city, to be sure (I never claimed that it wasn't). But what you and the cultural Left do not (actually, truth be told, will not) understand is Precisely what McWhorter points out here; that it became an iconic musical form of a sub-cultural element within the inner city black community that has, for all intents, opted out of participating in the project of civilization. They have become barbarians who's entire stance toward civil society is one of opposition and antagonism. And this is the key: it was not poverty qua poverty that appears to have generated this dynamic, otherwise, it would have generated that dynamic long ago and across racial and ethnic lines (blacks were moving into the middle class in substantial numbers throughout the fifties and into the sixties, and their overall economic position in society was moving forward on a consistent basis, when the Great Society was created, unlike in the pre-WWII world, and during the Great Depression, when vast numbers of Americans, black and white, underwent a long season of intransigent economic collapse and the relative term "poverty" had a number of different connotations, as far as actual living standards go, than it does now). The key here is the rise of the welfare state, the mentality of entitlement and permanent grievance; the concept of welfare as a "right," and the use of racial balkanization and a cult of victimology the flames of which were fanned by supportive ideologies and programs (Affirmative Action, black cultural nationalism, doctrines culled from critical race theory, Afrocentrism etc.) that was targeted, since the inauguration of the Great Society, most aggressively at Black Americans.


You even italicize the line for emphasis. That's more strident that my mere claim to influence, and yet you approve. You're all over the map. You seem satisfied to cut and paste any writing, of which you've done several, if it is 1) critical of hip hop and 2) written by a black guy.


There are quite a number of (very educated and intelligent) "black guys" out there who do not accept the views of white liberals and leftists in this area, and who, indeed, deplore them, just as I and many of the best minds in American political philosophy also do.

The message, beyond your own confusion over what is you actually think, is simply, "how can you criticize my attitudes when black people also also complain about hip-hop's status among blacks?!" The thought that there are distinct points being made, not all the same as yours, doesn't enter your mind.


You have yet to field a single argument that demonstrates that Mr. McWhorter made a single claim in his piece that I would not, on the merits of the case, agree with, for the most part.

Really, the attitude here is more racist than your unthinking repetition of racist dog whistling of hip-hop that you mistakenly believe to be the same thing John McWhoter is saying.


More of the typical left-wing emotional venting that passes, in most cases, for "argument" among the Anointed. Please proceed, E.

I don't think that hip-hop is the only authentic expression of the experience of inner-city poverty among blacks. I agree with McWhorter on this point, which I referenced to Dr. Scratch, and would criticize anyone who held that attitude.


That's good, but, unfortunately, the vast majority of the academic world, the mainstream pop news and entertainment media, and K-12 public ed and the teachers colleges, do not make that distinction, nor have both the black and white pop news media and entertainment industry refrained, for the last 25 years or so, from bloating and extolling gangsta rap and Hip-Hop into a symbolic representation of authentic "blackness," and implied, either implicitly or explicitly, that blacks who do not conform to this ideologically interested stereotype are, in some sense, less that truly black.

Modern academia has been especially complicit, over the last three decades, in fomenting and popularizing these attitudes and beliefs.

I think it is an authentic expression, however - one we don't have to always agree with to find artistic merit in. Moreover, it's a pretty diverse genre, much more so than when this essay was written.


Irrelevant, however. "Gangsta" and underclass values-dominated Hip-Hop, while a sub-genre of rap and Hip-Hop respectively, during and after the 80s came to dominate these genres and, more importantly, came to dominate almost the entire black and white entertainment pop cultural presentation of black culture and that which determines its "authenticity." (whatever that actually means). Its intellectual justifications derive from the academy and its various sectarian ideological cults that have wrapped themselves within the folds of academia and ensconced themselves in higher education as "black studies," "Afrocentrism, "diversity," and multiculturalism, broadly speaking.

Finally, since you mention it, not all displays of lavish wealth look the same. Bill Gates is a particularly poor example because he's quite Aspergery and from a geek subculture that doesn't care for ostentatious displays of wealth. But, at the end of the day, a platinum chain and a incredibly expensive suit aren't all that different in what they represent. That one is more "thuggish" and crude to you over the other represents some cultural prejudices you harbor.


More emotion-based baiting and spleen venting. Do you think you could actually concentrate on fielding a reasoned body of logically connected arguments, just for once, E? You might actually find it more stimulating than acting like Chris Matthews (your continual snide little smears about things like my alleged "cultural prejudices" are nothing more that indications of your own prejudicial bigotries against people who disagree with your own ideological framework. All of a piece, really).

Anyway, I see little connection between George Benson walking around in a suit that costs several thousand dollars (I saw a short documentary on him once in which he was shown picking one out that I recall, in that particular instance, ran about $8,000) and this:

Image

[img]
http://cdnl.complex.com/mp/620/400/80/0 ... -blaze.jpg[/img]


Image


Image


Image

Here's yet another one of EAs, Beastie's, Scratch's, Cam's etc. mascots, and an "authentic" voice of the "authentic" "African" American "experience":

Image
Nothing is going to startle us more when we pass through the veil to the other side than to realize how well we know our Father [in Heaven] and how familiar his face is to us

- President Ezra Taft Benson


I am so old that I can remember when most of the people promoting race hate were white.

- Thomas Sowell
_Droopy
_Emeritus
Posts: 9826
Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 4:06 pm

Re: Another Perspective

Post by _Droopy »

Gadianton wrote:Oh I see the problem, P. Diddy (if that's how you write it) has adorned himself in Droopy's picture with not one, but two crosses. That's worse than wearing two earrings. The true Church of Jesus Christ has banished the cross, and here is this punk promoting serious theological falsehoods. No wonder the inner cities of this country have come under such troubles.


Your excessive fixations (you know, the one's that you bring here in lieu of having a stimulating, serious discussion of anything) have become more than a bit of a bore, Gad.

Anyway, can someone explain to me Droopy's agenda? I get that he thinks liberals have glorified hip hop music.


They have done far more than that; they have glorified, excused, and romanticized the very life of crime, adversary culture threat, anti-intellectualism, sexual predation, unwed motherhood, single-parent child rearing, and racial separatism that lies at the base of this kind of music, the same music that has come to dominate and marginalize literally all other forms of uniquely black cultural production, and they have been doing this since the late sixties (the early "radical chic" of the white, upscale leftist intelligentsia's vetting, romanticizing, and pouring of sycophantic adulation upon the Black Panthers was just the earliest manifestation of this phenomena (which has been extended since then to "indigenous people" of the Third World, American Indians, and "the poor" generally).

I do need to point out that promoting images and fashions has at least as much to do with profiteering as it does with making a serious political alignments.


Profiteering from what?

Having said that, what is the right course of action for liberals. Let's say I'm a liberal, which I'm not, and I want to change myself and the world for the better. What would I do? Write essays condemning hip hop? Would any hip hop aritsts read them? Do we need to call for a ban? As a supposed white liberal, what is the best course of action for me to take in relation to "black culture" in order to repent? And how will this lead to resolving racial tensions, violence, etc.?


Would you actually like any of these questions addressed, or is this scattergun intended to put sand in the gears?
Nothing is going to startle us more when we pass through the veil to the other side than to realize how well we know our Father [in Heaven] and how familiar his face is to us

- President Ezra Taft Benson


I am so old that I can remember when most of the people promoting race hate were white.

- Thomas Sowell
_beastie
_Emeritus
Posts: 14216
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 2:26 am

Re: Another Perspective

Post by _beastie »

Droopy lives in a world of strawmen, against which he is a valiant warrior.
We hate to seem like we don’t trust every nut with a story, but there’s evidence we can point to, and dance while shouting taunting phrases.

Penn & Teller

http://www.mormonmesoamerica.com
_EAllusion
_Emeritus
Posts: 18519
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 12:39 pm

Re: Another Perspective

Post by _EAllusion »

Droopy wrote:Here's the entire quote:

Country music is similar to hip hop in that it is heavily influenced and consumed by people touched by poverty. That's why those themes come up a lot.


Heh. I guess you could quote the entire post if you want. Adding the extra line that falls in line with what I already quoted doesn't do much.

Why did no antinomian, anti-civilizational thug culture glorifying criminality, drug use, macho posing, misogyny, predatory, adventuristic male sexuality, and gang membership originate among the Oakies or among the vast numbers of unemployed blue collar workers of the Depression era?


Country music did in significant part come out of that particular time period and class. So, case in point? Even if it didn't, no one is arguing that it is inevitable that hip-hop develops out of poverty, but rather that poverty helps explain the content of hip-hop. WW I helps explain the writings of Hemingway, but that doesn't mean every war produces Hemingway's themes and style.

McWhorter points out here; that it became an iconic musical form of a sub-cultural element within the inner city black community that has, for all intents, opted out of participating in the project of civilization. They have become barbarians who's entire stance toward civil society is one of opposition and antagonism.


McWhorter doesn't think that, and I'm pretty sure he'd be offended at the characterization. How far gone do you have to be to think McWhorter is pointing out that inner city blacks into hip-hop are uncivilized barbarians? I mean, holy Christ. I guess this is why it would help if, instead of cutting and pasting the essay and demanding comment, you took your own advice and expressed what you think.

That's good, but, unfortunately, the vast majority of the academic world, the mainstream pop news and entertainment media, and K-12 public ed and the teachers colleges, do not make that distinction,


Perhaps in your fantasy world you spend your days arguing with, but I'm pretty sure academics understand that (some) hip-hop music isn't the only authentic expression of what it's like to be a black person in America. Feel free to share actual evidence rather that brute assertions.
Anyway, I see little connection between George Benson walking around in a suit that costs several thousand dollars (I saw a short documentary on him once in which he was shown picking one out that I recall, in that particular instance, ran about $8,000) and this:


They're both aimed at looking good and do so in part by displaying raw wealth. The only difference is the cultural standards of dress to look good. It's not different than a an LDS general authority wearing a snazzy suit in the vein of Mormon dress norms. The fact that you look at those pictures and think "uncivilized barbarians!" is where the racism charges are getting, quite accurately thrown at. By the way, McWhorter, while fairly conservative as far as linguists go, writes a fair amount against arbitrary cultural prejudices against various dialects being less civilized ("ebonics", etc.) and would find your prejudices on the the similar point of dress quite distasteful. Most of us can recognize that different subcultures have different ideas of what swag is. Jeeze.
_EAllusion
_Emeritus
Posts: 18519
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 12:39 pm

Re: Another Perspective

Post by _EAllusion »

Come to think of it, I recall reading McWhorter being abhorred by the way the right was using Trayvon Martin's manner of speaking, dress, the fact that he smoked weed, was into hip-hop posturing etc. as a way of demeaning who he was and justifying his shooting. I'm pretty sure he flat called that racist, part of the subliminal discrimination that led to his death, and described those social cues as normal behavior for an American teenager. He absolutely would call what Droopy's "uncivilized barbarians" comments on the same behaviors racist.

I'll see if I can't find that a little later on. I think it may have been in The New Republic. Once Droopy realizes that he's a writer for The New REpublic, that'll send his "Leftist! Dismiss! Dismiss! Dismiss!" alarm bells ringing, but it's kinda too late to write everything he says off.
_EAllusion
_Emeritus
Posts: 18519
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 12:39 pm

Re: Another Perspective

Post by _EAllusion »

http://www.tnr.com/article/politics/102 ... ord-police

It turns out that Martin had smoked pot, and was fond of profanity. Predictably, and sickeningly, the right is exploiting the less-than-sterling aspects of his life to suggest they should have some bearing on how we judge George Zimmerman’s having shot him dead. In point of fact, all they prove is that he was an ordinary American teenager. The weed and the salty language are par for the course among more than a few of my favorite undergrads I teach at Columbia. Yes, Martin jauntily labeled himself with the N-word, but as endless threnodies over the past 20 years have stressed, absolutely nothing could be more typical of someone of his age and demographic.


It goes on along the lines I described.

As a bonus,

The very nature of being black in the United States is now marked insidiously and essentially by the perceived reality of constantly being forced to deal with malevolent police forces. Indeed, a representative example of the black condition is what black journalist Deborah Mathis, in her syndicated column in 1997, called “Blackmotheritis”: “a nervous disorder afflicting millions of black women with adolescent or teenaged children, particularly the mothers of boys.” Mathis explains how she told her son:

Keep your hands out of your pockets. Don’t reach under your shirt. If there’s an itch, just live with it. In winter, keep your jacket open.
Mathis wasn’t kidding:

The other day, on a brief shopping foray, Joseph popped his hand beneath his shirt to rub a mosquito bite. “Joseph!” I shouted. My son’s name fell hard from my mouth as if it were a pain to say it. “Get your hand …” “Okay, Ma,” he said impatiently, then muttered something that seemed, at once, mad and sad. “I just don’t want …” I began, ruefully. “I know, Ma, I know. I’m sorry.”
Certainly Mathis was laying it on a bit. However, at The Washington Post, Jonathan Capeheart, a black journalist more temperate and influential than Mathis, recounts similar advice given to him in the 1980s and says that he followed it; Charles Blow has recounted a kind of “Blackfatheritis” as well.

“Oh, come on,” many of us think—including me, usually. Even outdoors, I scratch when I have an itch and do not consider myself lucky to have avoided arrest for it. But then along comes an episode like what happened to Martin. Suddenly, the narrative that the cops are anti-black, and that consequently, on a certain level being black is a battle against the cops, seems much more compelling. The feeling of resentment and persecution percolates. Gangsta rap ends up making a kind of sense, as does the title that Ishmael Reed gave his report on the black condition: Another Day at the Front.


http://www.tnr.com/article/101840/trayv ... -injustice.

Compare that with your views Droopy. If you are up to it, feel free to reread posts of mine where I said things like, "People write what they know. We can understand that without agreeing with the message..." in light of what McWhorter is saying here. We can understand and appreciate the sentiments of a song like "“F” the Police" rising from a poorer community that, due to the drug war and more subtle discriminatory attitudes, is living under incredibly oppressive policing other segments of society are not. We can not turn into would-be cop-killers while appreciating the art and understanding its influences.
_Droopy
_Emeritus
Posts: 9826
Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 4:06 pm

Re: Another Perspective

Post by _Droopy »

beastie wrote:Droopy lives in a world of strawmen, against which he is a valiant warrior.



Substanceless, as is 99% of your posting history.
Nothing is going to startle us more when we pass through the veil to the other side than to realize how well we know our Father [in Heaven] and how familiar his face is to us

- President Ezra Taft Benson


I am so old that I can remember when most of the people promoting race hate were white.

- Thomas Sowell
Post Reply