America Doesn?????t Have a Gun Problem, It Has a Gang Problem

The Off-Topic forum for anything non-LDS related, such as sports or politics. Rated PG through PG-13.
_krose
_Emeritus
Posts: 2555
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 1:18 pm

Re: America Doesn’t Have a Gun Problem, It Has a Gang Proble

Post by _krose »

Droopy wrote:But, quite clearly, he was not, in point of fact, a "devout Christian" at all. Take a run, Ludwigm, through the Ten Commandments or the Articles of Faith and see if you can find anything that supports, or does not unambiguously condemn mass murder.

Mass murder, as all murder or unlawful use of violence, is not the province of morally healthy, balanced, ethically mature, law-abiding human beings, which this individual, by definition, was not.

Thank you for that nice example of the No True Scotsman fallacious argument.


Of course, as Ludwig pointed out, you conveniently ignore your god commanding Joshua and his marauders to commit mass murder, even being so kind as to extend the daylight to accommodate the deed.
"The DNA of fictional populations appears to be the most susceptible to extinction." - Simon Southerton
_krose
_Emeritus
Posts: 2555
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 1:18 pm

Re: America Doesn’t Have a Gun Problem, It Has a Gang Proble

Post by _krose »

As I said earlier, the second amendment is equally as valid today as the third amendment.
"The DNA of fictional populations appears to be the most susceptible to extinction." - Simon Southerton
_Brackite
_Emeritus
Posts: 6382
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 8:12 am

Re: America Doesn’t Have a Gun Problem, It Has a Gang Proble

Post by _Brackite »

.
Last edited by MSNbot Media on Fri Feb 28, 2014 7:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"And I've said it before, you want to know what Joseph Smith looked like in Nauvoo, just look at Trump." - Fence Sitter
_Darth J
_Emeritus
Posts: 13392
Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 12:16 am

Re: America Doesn’t Have a Gun Problem, It Has a Gang Proble

Post by _Darth J »

krose wrote:As I said earlier, the second amendment is equally as valid today as the third amendment.


Because in modern times, the government would never force a private property owner to house soldiers on his property without his consent. Right? http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case? ... i=scholarr
Post Reply