Book review: The Book of Mormon

The Off-Topic forum for anything non-LDS related, such as sports or politics. Rated PG through PG-13.
Post Reply
_Darth J
_Emeritus
Posts: 13392
Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 12:16 am

Book review: The Book of Mormon

Post by _Darth J »

I have been looking for a book that explains the basic teachings of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. A friend recommended that I start with The Book of Mormon, which was published by Joseph Smith in 1830.

Unfortunately, this book did not serve my purpose at all, as it has no discernible relationship with the teachings of the modern Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Although I did recognize a few quotes here and there that are occasionally seen in LDS teaching curricula or heard in General Conference talks, it turns out that when these quotes are seen in their original context, they have little to nothing to do with the points the LDS Church and its leaders are attempting to make when cherry-picking such quotes.

In summary, if you are in the market for literature about modern Mormonism, I cannot recommend The Book of Mormon.
_krose
_Emeritus
Posts: 2555
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 1:18 pm

Re: Book review: The Book of Mormon

Post by _krose »

Well, it does provide an impressive justification for murder.

So at least there's that.
"The DNA of fictional populations appears to be the most susceptible to extinction." - Simon Southerton
_Quasimodo
_Emeritus
Posts: 11784
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 1:11 am

Re: Book review: The Book of Mormon

Post by _Quasimodo »

The best book review I've seen on the Book of Mormon (no doubt all of you have seen it before). Still, worth reading again.

Mark Twain wrote:"All men have heard of the Mormon Bible, but few except the "elect" have seen it, or, at least, taken the trouble to read it. I brought away a copy from Salt Lake. The book is a curiosity to me, it is such a pretentious affair, and yet so "slow," so sleepy; such an insipid mess of inspiration. It is chloroform in print. If Joseph Smith composed this book, the act was a miracle--keeping awake while he did it was, at any rate. If he, according to tradition, merely translated it from certain ancient and mysteriously-engraved plates of copper, which he declares he found under a stone, in an out-of-the-way locality, the work of translating was equally a miracle, for the same reason.

The book seems to be merely a prosy detail of imaginary history, with the Old Testament for a model; followed by a tedious plagiarism of the New Testament. The author labored to give his words and phrases the quaint, old-fashioned sound and structure of our King James's translation of the Scriptures; and the result is a mongrel--half modern glibness, and half ancient simplicity and gravity. The latter is awkward and constrained; the former natural, but grotesque by the contrast. Whenever he found his speech growing too modern--which was about every sentence or two--he
ladled in a few such Scriptural phrases as "exceeding sore," "and it came to pass," etc., and made things satisfactory again. "And it came to pass" was his pet. If he had left that out, his Bible would have been only a pamphlet…
This, or any other post that I have made or will make in the future, is strictly my own opinion and consequently of little or no value.

"Faith is believing something you know ain't true" Twain.
_Gadianton
_Emeritus
Posts: 9947
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 5:12 am

Re: Book review: The Book of Mormon

Post by _Gadianton »

I have also read The Book of Mormon. Here are the official ratings:

Entertainment: 2
Quality of information: 9
Command of the Efficient Market Hypothesis: 8.2

As Quasimodo pointed out, the book is not an adrenaline rush. The quality of information is high, however, as a proprietary story about a lost civilization, it's the official source to learn about the people and events it describes.

The author has a reasonably good understanding of market efficiency and emphatically rejects the idea as not only false, but demonic, and as is the cases of much other material i've read recently, the belief in market efficiency often contributes to widespread crisis in society. The author sees market failure in terms of informational efficiency as two-fold. Information is wildly assymetric, and market participants are on the average irrational.

Key characters like Lehi and Nephi continually receive inside information on market events and follow these hot tips to outperform the market. Nephi, for instance, uses the strategy of prayer to find "loose change on the ground" in the form of supernatural bows and magical compasses. Using these items, he is able to bring home more game than those who do not pray. Lehi is told by the greatest insider of them all to flee Jerusalem because it will be destroyed and does so, soaring high above the crisis. While information assymetry is rife, the author makes it a point to show that information assymetry is an incurable situation that does not self-correct due to agent rationality. No matter how many times hot tips and secret formulas are revealed to society as a whole, the information is ignored. Time and time again, the prophets beat the market using simple strategies that anyone can replicate and time and time again, their advice is ignored and scorned.

Key players who contribute to the problem of informational friction and systemic irrationality are students of the Chicago-School theory, such as Laman and Lemuel. There's an old story many of us have heard where Laman and Lemuel are walking in the wilderness and Laman spots a Senum of silver on the ground and points it out to Lemuel who simply responds, "it must be fake," and the two walk on. Lamen and Lemuel are blinded by the myth of a rational market and fail ad nauseum to take advantage of the secret formulas Nephi offers them time and time again. Even when angels appear to them personally to give them a tip, they reject the information as useless, confirming their belief in the strong form of market efficiency that not even inside information can be used to achieve better returns than the market average.

A great example of an academic who lured a civilization into complacency and ruin is Korihor, who approached Alma and his brethren to argue that the "fund" they were running ate up capital in terms of management fees and that the people would do just as well in a passive strategy. Alma is a proud chartist who can read the motions of the heavens and guide the allocation of resources in his society better than the market can do on its own. Korihor convinces many people that Alma cannot predict the future and has no information advantage above the collective wisdom of men, many believe him, and go their own way to their own peril, bringing about widespread unemployment and crimes, as irrationality drives the children of men into unconstrained whoredoms and debauchary.

The author of the book understands the value for those who read it. Those who learn simple strategies such as prayer and trend-watching (prosperity cycle etc) can "time the market" and beat the competition. Of course, while the author understands his message well, we are left with some inconsistencies. What if everyone prayed and found Liahona, then how can prayer work when there are only so many animals in the forest to hunt? There are implications that God can simply remove the resource constraint such that everyone bags their game. But this has limited application to today's world where men have contrived their own zero-sum institutions that are difficult even for God to get around. Consider BYU students who all pray to do well on tests but the advantage of prayer on average is nullified by the fact that teachers grade on a curve.

One is also amazed at the disconnect between the Book of Mormon's message about market failures and the demand by Mormons to live under a free-market regime. However, there are also intuitions that this is just rhetoric used to justify poverity and that Mormons would elect an official who combines Book of Mormon strategies such as prayer with a successful career in asset pricing to create a production powerhouse for America that is broadly market socialist; so in this way, there is consistency between faith and scripture.
Last edited by Guest on Sun Feb 17, 2013 8:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Lou Midgley 08/20/2020: "...meat wad," and "cockroach" are pithy descriptions of human beings used by gemli? They were not fashioned by Professor Peterson.

LM 11/23/2018: one can explain away the soul of human beings...as...a Meat Unit, to use Professor Peterson's clever derogatory description of gemli's ideology.
_honorentheos
_Emeritus
Posts: 11104
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 5:17 am

Re: Book review: The Book of Mormon

Post by _honorentheos »

Gad, that may be the post of the year. At least for originality and wit it gets my vote.
The world is always full of the sound of waves..but who knows the heart of the sea, a hundred feet down? Who knows it's depth?
~ Eiji Yoshikawa
_Kittens_and_Jesus
_Emeritus
Posts: 1233
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 9:41 pm

Re: Book review: The Book of Mormon

Post by _Kittens_and_Jesus »

Quasimodo wrote:The best book review I've seen on the Book of Mormon (no doubt all of you have seen it before). Still, worth reading again.

Mark Twain wrote:"All men have heard of the Mormon Bible, but few except the "elect" have seen it, or, at least, taken the trouble to read it. I brought away a copy from Salt Lake. The book is a curiosity to me, it is such a pretentious affair, and yet so "slow," so sleepy; such an insipid mess of inspiration. It is chloroform in print. If Joseph Smith composed this book, the act was a miracle--keeping awake while he did it was, at any rate. If he, according to tradition, merely translated it from certain ancient and mysteriously-engraved plates of copper, which he declares he found under a stone, in an out-of-the-way locality, the work of translating was equally a miracle, for the same reason.

The book seems to be merely a prosy detail of imaginary history, with the Old Testament for a model; followed by a tedious plagiarism of the New Testament. The author labored to give his words and phrases the quaint, old-fashioned sound and structure of our King James's translation of the Scriptures; and the result is a mongrel--half modern glibness, and half ancient simplicity and gravity. The latter is awkward and constrained; the former natural, but grotesque by the contrast. Whenever he found his speech growing too modern--which was about every sentence or two--he
ladled in a few such Scriptural phrases as "exceeding sore," "and it came to pass," etc., and made things satisfactory again. "And it came to pass" was his pet. If he had left that out, his Bible would have been only a pamphlet…


It never gets old to me.
As soon as you concern yourself with the 'good' and 'bad' of your fellows, you create an opening in your heart for maliciousness to enter. Testing, competing with, and criticizing others weaken and defeat you. - O'Sensei
_Fence Sitter
_Emeritus
Posts: 8862
Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2010 3:49 pm

Re: Book review: The Book of Mormon

Post by _Fence Sitter »

Well maybe they can improve it a bit by making a musical out of it. If you add some catchy songs and snappy costumes people may overlook the storyline, just look at how long CATS lasted on Broadway. :lol:
"Any over-ritualized religion since the dawn of time can make its priests say yes, we know, it is rotten, and hard luck, but just do as we say, keep at the ritual, stick it out, give us your money and you'll end up with the angels in heaven for evermore."
Post Reply