The real Lucy. 3.2 million years old.
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 11784
- Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 1:11 am
The real Lucy. 3.2 million years old.
My wife and I spent a lovely afternoon at the Bowers Museum in Santa Anna, CA. The major exhibit was of the REAL fossils of "Lucy". Australopithecus afarensis, an upright walking ancestor that is 3.2 million years old.
I've been reading and seeing documentaries for many years about her. To actually see her up close was beyond amazing. For a medical illustrator, seeing the similarities to modern humans of her knee joints and pelvis, proximal femur, etc. was actually a little moving.
If anyone is in the area and has an interest, I would highly suggest you make an effort to go. The exhibit lasts until April 28th.
http://www.bowers.org/index.php/art/exhibitions_listing/current
A humorous aside. While I was there, a skeptical older lady seriously ask how they really knew her name was "Lucy" (I immediately thought of Tobin). The docent patiently explained that it was a nick name given by Donald Johanson (the paleontologist who found her) when he was examining the fossils at his base camp and the Beatles' song "Lucy in the sky with diamonds" was playing on a cassette tape.
I've been reading and seeing documentaries for many years about her. To actually see her up close was beyond amazing. For a medical illustrator, seeing the similarities to modern humans of her knee joints and pelvis, proximal femur, etc. was actually a little moving.
If anyone is in the area and has an interest, I would highly suggest you make an effort to go. The exhibit lasts until April 28th.
http://www.bowers.org/index.php/art/exhibitions_listing/current
A humorous aside. While I was there, a skeptical older lady seriously ask how they really knew her name was "Lucy" (I immediately thought of Tobin). The docent patiently explained that it was a nick name given by Donald Johanson (the paleontologist who found her) when he was examining the fossils at his base camp and the Beatles' song "Lucy in the sky with diamonds" was playing on a cassette tape.
This, or any other post that I have made or will make in the future, is strictly my own opinion and consequently of little or no value.
"Faith is believing something you know ain't true" Twain.
"Faith is believing something you know ain't true" Twain.
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 6914
- Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 2:56 am
Re: The real Lucy. 3.2 million years old.
I think it was shocking for the first Europeans to see apes and realize how similar they are to humans.
But yeah, Quasi I find evolution fascinating. I still struggle to slow it down and imagine how it might have looked at each stage. Perhaps developing nonopposable toes happened quickly since that DNA was already in our animal ancestry and just needed a few repressor genes to be turned off.
Imagine if the Neanderthals would have survived. How would we treat them now?
But yeah, Quasi I find evolution fascinating. I still struggle to slow it down and imagine how it might have looked at each stage. Perhaps developing nonopposable toes happened quickly since that DNA was already in our animal ancestry and just needed a few repressor genes to be turned off.
Imagine if the Neanderthals would have survived. How would we treat them now?
And when the confederates saw Jackson standing fearless as a stone wall the army of Northern Virginia took courage and drove the federal army off their land.
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 22508
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:42 pm
Re: The real Lucy. 3.2 million years old.
ajax18 wrote:
Imagine if the Neanderthals would have survived. How would we treat them now?
Most likely as fellow conservatives.
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 2555
- Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 1:18 pm
Re: The real Lucy. 3.2 million years old.
moksha wrote:ajax18 wrote:
Imagine if the Neanderthals would have survived. How would we treat them now?
Most likely as fellow conservatives.
OMG.
Please never leave us. You are a board treasure.
"The DNA of fictional populations appears to be the most susceptible to extinction." - Simon Southerton
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 6382
- Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 8:12 am
Re: The real Lucy. 3.2 million years old.
moksha wrote:ajax18 wrote:
Imagine if the Neanderthals would have survived. How would we treat them now?
Most likely as fellow conservatives.
What about the Liberals that are running California now?
"And I've said it before, you want to know what Joseph Smith looked like in Nauvoo, just look at Trump." - Fence Sitter
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 18534
- Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2006 6:48 pm
Re: The real Lucy. 3.2 million years old.
What about the Liberals that are running California now?
They are indeed regressive enough to qualify as Neanderthals.
Machina Sublime
Satan's Plan Deconstructed.
Your Best Resource On Joseph Smith's Polygamy.
Conservatism is the Gospel of Christ and the Plan of Salvation in Action.
The Degeneracy Of Progressivism.
Satan's Plan Deconstructed.
Your Best Resource On Joseph Smith's Polygamy.
Conservatism is the Gospel of Christ and the Plan of Salvation in Action.
The Degeneracy Of Progressivism.
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 9826
- Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 4:06 pm
Re: The real Lucy. 3.2 million years old.
bcspace wrote:What about the Liberals that are running California now?
They are indeed regressive enough to qualify as Neanderthals.
Yes, but a rather unlikeable subspecies:
Nothing is going to startle us more when we pass through the veil to the other side than to realize how well we know our Father [in Heaven] and how familiar his face is to us
- President Ezra Taft Benson
I am so old that I can remember when most of the people promoting race hate were white.
- Thomas Sowell
- President Ezra Taft Benson
I am so old that I can remember when most of the people promoting race hate were white.
- Thomas Sowell
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 11784
- Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 1:11 am
Re: The real Lucy. 3.2 million years old.
ajax18 wrote:I think it was shocking for the first Europeans to see apes and realize how similar they are to humans.
But yeah, Quasi I find evolution fascinating. I still struggle to slow it down and imagine how it might have looked at each stage. Perhaps developing nonopposable toes happened quickly since that DNA was already in our animal ancestry and just needed a few repressor genes to be turned off.
Imagine if the Neanderthals would have survived. How would we treat them now?
Hi ajax,
Apparently she had feet similar to ours:
http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2011/02/lucy-had-a-spring-in-her-step.html
That was a very good question.
There is a lot of contention at the moment, but some experts believe that we all have a little Neanderthal DNA in our genes (despite the later comments on this thread)

This, or any other post that I have made or will make in the future, is strictly my own opinion and consequently of little or no value.
"Faith is believing something you know ain't true" Twain.
"Faith is believing something you know ain't true" Twain.
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 7625
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2010 1:58 am
Re: The real Lucy. 3.2 million years old.
Hey quasi
Cool!
I bet she was just as moved to see you.
That's the story of how she was named Lucy? Way cool! Thanks for sharing that. (I think he should have named her Diamond)
Peace,
Ceeboo

Quasimodo wrote:My wife and I spent a lovely afternoon at the Bowers Museum in Santa Anna, CA. The major exhibit was of the REAL fossils of "Lucy". Australopithecus afarensis, an upright walking ancestor that is 3.2 million years old.
Cool!
I've been reading and seeing documentaries for many years about her. To actually see her up close was beyond amazing. For a medical illustrator, seeing the similarities to modern humans of her knee joints and pelvis, proximal femur, etc. was actually a little moving.
I bet she was just as moved to see you.

The docent patiently explained that it was a nick name given by Donald Johanson (the paleontologist who found her) when he was examining the fossils at his base camp and the Beatles' song "Lucy in the sky with diamonds" was playing on a cassette tape.
That's the story of how she was named Lucy? Way cool! Thanks for sharing that. (I think he should have named her Diamond)
Peace,
Ceeboo
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 11784
- Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 1:11 am
Re: The real Lucy. 3.2 million years old.
Ceeboo wrote:Hey quasi
Quasimodo wrote:My wife and I spent a lovely afternoon at the Bowers Museum in Santa Anna, CA. The major exhibit was of the REAL fossils of "Lucy". Australopithecus afarensis, an upright walking ancestor that is 3.2 million years old.
Cool!I've been reading and seeing documentaries for many years about her. To actually see her up close was beyond amazing. For a medical illustrator, seeing the similarities to modern humans of her knee joints and pelvis, proximal femur, etc. was actually a little moving.
I bet she was just as moved to see you.
The docent patiently explained that it was a nick name given by Donald Johanson (the paleontologist who found her) when he was examining the fossils at his base camp and the Beatles' song "Lucy in the sky with diamonds" was playing on a cassette tape.
That's the story of how she was named Lucy? Way cool! Thanks for sharing that. (I think he should have named her Diamond)
Peace,
Ceeboo
Hi Ceeboo!
It was a wonderful day. Lucy displayed no emotion when we met. I guess you get a little jaded after three million years.
They even had "Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds" playing quietly in the display room.
Good to see you!
This, or any other post that I have made or will make in the future, is strictly my own opinion and consequently of little or no value.
"Faith is believing something you know ain't true" Twain.
"Faith is believing something you know ain't true" Twain.