rcrocket wrote: Yes, calling you a coward is a slam. You're a coward. If I had your name, I'd report you to Ben & Jerry's.
Robert D. Crockett [in real life removed]
Has just been altered to read:
rcrocket wrote: Yes, calling you a coward is a slam. You're a coward. If I had your name, I'd report you to Ben & Jerry's.
Why did you do that? It's pretty scary to think that moderators can go back and change entire threads without a peep. With that in mind, knows what's actually been said on this board?
lance peters wrote:... but not nearly as concerned as the person who originally wrote to DCP is.
Please clarify this relationship between you and this original author.
Shade's, apparently we are back to the same old battle with a user putting another users work information in their posts. I edited this information out, as a moderator and with a note. the user has undone my moderation edit.
I'm calling for a ban of this new user for two reasons: 1. once again using information that lead to their leaving last time. 2. modifying a moderations edit.
I've noted this post in the moderator forum and will leave your report for Shade's to deal with.
I've followed your posts and find them extremely erudite and sophisticated. Please show me some patience as I try to determine exactly what Universal Board rule is being violated by quoting a poster's posts in their entirety and without alteration. Here is the thread and post in question:
rcrocket wrote: Yes, calling you a coward is a slam. You're a coward. If I had your name, I'd report you to Ben & Jerry's.
Robert D. Crockett [in real life removed]
rcrocket wrote:Is it in your English dictionary? You don't want to commit a faux pas, my good recchione, do you?
rcrocket
rcrocket wrote: I never once called you a faggot. That is not what I do, my good buzi.
RockSlider wrote:Shades's, apparently we are back to the same old battle with a user putting another users work information in their posts. I edited this information out, as a moderator and with a note. the user has undone my moderation edit.
I'm calling for a ban of this new user for two reasons: 1. once again using information that lead to their leaving last time. 2. modifying a moderations edit.
I've noted this post in the moderator forum and will leave your report for Shades's to deal with.
Rock, did you look at the original thread? Bob published his full name and employer in his own post, which is his right. There is nothing wrong with another poster quoting the information Bob first published.
dblagent007 wrote:Rock, did you look at the original thread? Bob published his full name and employer in his own post, which is his right. There is nothing wrong with another poster quoting the information Bob first published.
dblagent007, there is a bunch of back scenes that has already transpired on this issue, and the removal of Bot's employer from all posts here was done per Shades approval some time back.
Either we are against in real life attacks here or we are not. Starting this all over again is unacceptable to me.
dblagent007 wrote:Rock, did you look at the original thread? Bob published his full name and employer in his own post, which is his right. There is nothing wrong with another poster quoting the information Bob first published.
dblagent007, there is a bunch of back scenes that has already transpired on this issue, and the removal of Bot's employer from all posts here was done per Shades approval some time back.
Either we are against in real life attacks here or we are not. Starting this all over again is unacceptable to me.
Mr. Nemesis,
CFR that Dr. Shades refused to allow rcrocket to post this:
rcrocket wrote: Yes, calling you a coward is a slam. You're a coward. If I had your name, I'd report you to Ben & Jerry's.
Soso wrote:CFR that Dr. Shades refused to allow rcrocket to post this:
Bot has requested on multiple occasions, publically and to the mod’s to resend his indiscretion of posting his employer’s information four years ago. Noting that this was affecting his in real life world. He requested some safety from this site by granting him in real life protection from this.
Shades made the call to grant him his request and we removed all references of his employment from the board.
It seems only an asshole would continue on with attacking this individual in this way, let alone emailing his employer … all over a 10+ year old issue.
I'm truly saddened that a moderator of this message board thinks it's not only acceptable, but beyond reproach to call another person a "faggot" for simply expressing a different opinion on religious issues.
Shame on you, RockSlider, for that. It's not okay to disparage a segment of society to score rhetorical points.